Home Blog Page 209

PBI-Guatemala accompanies Peaceful Resistance of La Puya at day of socialization in El Carrizal about consultation process

On September 18, PBI-Guatemala posted:

“PBI accompanies the Peaceful Resistance of La Puya and the Human Rights Law Firm at the day of socialization in the El Carrizal community about the consultation process that the resistance has been demanding for years and will finally be carried out.”

In June 2022, Factor Cuatro reported:

“in June 2020, the Constitutional Court notified the Ministry of Energy and Mines of the ruling ordering this body to execute it, which gives rise to the process of consultation with indigenous peoples, based on ILO Convention 169.

The consultation process is because the Ministry of Energy and Mines did not consult the communities before granting the exploitation license.

The process of consultation with the peoples must be within the framework of their forms, customs and cultures of the communities, therefore, the violation of their rights and their ways of life undermines peace in their families and their form of organization.

Respect for the communities is the fundamental basis for the process to take place, within the framework of what is dictated by the sentence granted by the Constitutional Court. The general population must be vigilant to the process and that the bad practices that took place in the process in the territory of the Q’eqchi’ comrades are not repeated. Peoples deserve to live in peace, their forms, their customs, their cultures, are their heart.”

Key dates

On March 2, 2012, residents from San José del Golfo and San Pedro Ayampuc – an area known as La Puya, just north of Guatemala City – set up a 24-hour a day blockade at the entrance of the Vancouver-based Radius Gold Inc. El Tambor mine also known as the Progreso VII Derivada mine.

By August 2012, the Canadian company sold El Tambor to US-based Kappes, Cassiday & Associates, but retained an economic interest in the mine (including quarterly royalty payments on the gold production from the mine).

In December 2018, Kappes, Cassiday & Associates filed a $300 million claim with the International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes (ICSID), a World Bank arbitration mechanism, claiming its investor rights under the Dominican Republic–Central America Free Trade Agreement (CAFTA-DR) had been violated.

On May 21, 2021, the court suspension on the mine imposed in 2016 was lifted, but authorization for the mine to begin operation has not been granted.

We continue to follow the consultation process.

The Peace Brigades International-Guatemala Project has accompanied the Peaceful Resistance of La Puya since November 2012.

PBI highlights Guatemala, Colombia and Honduras at Interactive Dialogue with Special Rapporteur on non-recurrence

Video of presentation (starting at 1:42:57).

On September 16, Kim-Mai Vu of Peace Brigades International presented a statement at the United Nations Human Rights Council in Geneva during the interactive dialogue with Fabián Salvioli, the Special Rapporteur on the promotion of truth, justice, reparation and guarantees of non-recurrence.

The full statement is as follows:

“Thank you Mr President,

We welcome the Rapporteur’s report.

In Guatemala, the advances of previous years in transitional justice have not yet reached non-state actors and parallel powers with responsibility for crimes during the internal armed conflict. Today these actors are linked for example to the “Foundation against Terrorism” or to private associations of farmers, who publicly promote the dismantling of all advances in administration of justice for war crimes and attack, defame and call for attacks on human rights defenders, operators of justice and victims’ organizations that demand justice and rights.

In Colombia, we welcome the new macro case of the JEP [Special Jurisdiction for Peace] on Crimes committed by the public force, other State agents, in association with paramilitary groups or civilian third parties, essential for the non-repetition. Likewise, we underline the importance of the recent opening of the macro case on violence sexual and gender-based. We urge the JEP to move forward as quickly as possible in the cases, ensuring the genuine centrality of the victims, their protection, and fully respecting their rights to own sanctions that they consider restorative. We encourage implementation of the report’s recommendations of the Truth Commission, as well as its dissemination and pedagogy. We trust in a quick convocation of the Committee for the Selection of the new address of the Search Unit for Disappeared Persons, to advance their work.

In Honduras, the 2009 coup led to an increase in human rights violations and serious attacks against defenders. We consider four key moments for the promotion and guarantees of transitional justice: the selection of the Supreme Court of Justice, the installation of a Commission against Impunity; the issuance of the resolution on “Fraud on the Gualcarque” where the term stipulated by law has expired, and the guarantee of progress in the agreement signed this February between organizations Peasant Women and the State in the Resolution of the Bajo Aguan Conflict.

Thank you very much.”

To watch the video of the presentation (at 1:42:57) click here.

Gidimt’en land defenders: “We will never stop defending our yintah.”

Photo by Gidimt’en Checkpoint (September 18, 2022).

On September 18, Gidimt’en Checkpoint tweeted:

“URGENT UPDATE: The drill they will use to destroy Wedzin Kwa is now in place. We will never stop defending our yintah the way our ancestors have done for thousands of years. We need all your support now to ensure it will never be functional.”

Then on September 19, journalist Brandi Morin tweeted: “Wet’suwet’en Hereditary Chief Namoks & Jocey Alec of Gidimt’en Clan accessed the CGL drill pad site w CGL security watching every move on their own sovereign land. The drill is in place ready to hammer under Wet’suwet’en sacred Wedzin Kwa. Drone footage courtesy @Gidimten.”

This follows Houston Today, on September 14, reporting:

“The company would not release details other than to say two “trenchless watercourse crossings” are underway underneath the Morice River [Wedzin Kwa] south of Houston and at Crocker Creek in northeastern B.C. …Once preparations have been completed, the actual tunnelling time is expected to take two and half to three months.”

The Wet’suwet’en Hereditary Chiefs, the governance body for the 22,000 square kilometres of Wet’suwet’en territory in northern British Columbia, have not given their free, prior and informed consent for this pipeline to be built.

Since January 2019, 74 land defenders, legal observers and members of the media have been arrested in three militarized Royal Canadian Mounted Police (RCMP) actions on the territory.

Gidimt’en Checkpoint photo (November 19, 2021).

And over the three-month period of March to May 2022, the RCMP have attended the Gidimt’en village near the drill pad site 269 times.

In letters dated December 13, 2019, November 24, 2020, and April 29, 2022, the United Nations Committee on the Elimination of Racial Discrimination has called on Canada to withdraw the RCMP and stop the construction of this pipeline on Wet’suwet’en territory.

Watch Brandi Morin interview with land defender Molly Wickham here.

We continue to follow this situation.

Photo of the Coastal GasLink drill pad site situated by Wedzin Kwa. Photo by Gidimt’en Checkpoint (June 21, 2022).

Map by Canadian Press.

Tolima departmental assembly rejects contract awarded to Parex Resources over concerns about Ibagué aquifer

Photo: Departmental Assembly session in Tolima. Photo by Suministrada.

Ecos del Combeima reports that the Departmental Assembly in Tolima has rejected a contract awarded to Calgary-based Parex Resources.

The article highlights:

“Deputy Renzo García said that environmental damage would be caused to the Ibagué aquifer and that surface and groundwater would be contaminated. Similarly, the leader of the Green Alliance drew attention to the absence of citizen participation and the lack of attention to the declaration of climate emergency approved by the Departmental Assembly.”

Still from video by Renzo Garcia.

It also notes: “[The Departmental Assembly] rejects the contract for the award of the VSM25 block to the multinational PAREX Resources Inc, with an area of approximately 27,600 hectares, in the municipalities of Alvarado, Coello, Ibagué, Piedras and San Luis.”

The article further suggests that the Departmental Assembly will request the National Hydrocarbons Agency (ANH) to reverse the contract awarded Parex.

Photo from Ecos del Combeima.

VSM 25 in the Upper Magdalena Valley

In July 2013, the residents of the municipality of Piedras in the department of Tolima voted in a popular consultation against large-scale mining activities on their territory.

Americas Quarterly has explained that while Colombian law (Law 134 of 1994, Article 8) says it is obligatory for national authorities to respect the results of popular consultations, the Colombian government dismissed the results of the consultation, saying municipalities do not have the right to determine subsoil use.

Despite that popular consultation result, RCN Radio reported that in July 2019: “The National Hydrocarbons Agency (ANH) signed two new contracts with the Canadian multinational Parex Resources Colombia Ltd, with the purpose of carrying out exploration and exploitation activities in the departments of Tolima and Meta.”

At that time, the Mayor of Ibagué, Guillermo Alfonso Jaramillo, commented: “The Ibagué plateau has the fourth most important aquifer in the country, it is clean and necessary water for the future of a city since surface water is scarce. What would happen if there is an oil exploitation that contaminates those aquifers for us?”

Parex and “Water for All”

In its most recent Sustainability Report (on page 36), Parex highlighted: “During 2021, the Agua para Todos (“Water for All”) program continued to expand its reach to families from neighbouring communities, helping to improve their health and well-being.”

And yet this charity isn’t always welcome.

In 2020, El Nuevo Dia reported: “The contribution of markets and hydraulic pipe by the multinational was seen as a way to ‘buy’ wills, a fact that was emphatically rejected by a large part of the community of Doima.”

That article further noted: “In early July, the oil company … installed 230 metres of pipe for the community aqueduct of Doima [in Piedras, Tolima], without consulting the aqueduct board or the users…”

PBI visits Parex operations in Bajo Simacota, Santander

On June 29 of this year, Peace Brigades International accompanied the Regional Corporation for the Defence of Human Rights (CREDHOS) on a visit to the Parex Aguas Blancas gas/oil field in Bajo Simacota, Santander.

There we heard community concerns about how Parex operations had contaminated local water supplies.

Parex and fracking

In March 2019, Reuters reported: “At least five companies are interested in six fracking blocs in Colombia…” In that article, Maria Fernanda Suarez, who was the Colombian Mines and Energy Minister at that time, named Parex Resources as one of the companies interested in the fracking blocs.

Additionally, on July 9, 2022, Infobae reported that the new government’s intention to ban fracking could be an issue “for the four oil multinationals that signed the contracts with the Colombian State, for the commercial and experimental development of crude oil and gas in unconventional fields in Colombia” including “Parex Resources (with one contract)…”

That exploration and production (E&P) contract was signed on September 18, 2014, for Block VMM-9 but has been suspended, according to Parex in this December 2021 report, “due the lack of regulations to explore and exploit unconventional hydrocarbons.”

Chart from La Republica (September 2022). NOTE: Calgary-based Canacol Energy Ltd. holds a 20 per cent stake in the VMM-2/Plata and VMM-3/Piranga projects with ConocoPhillips. Toronto-based Sintana owns a 30 per cent non-operated participation interest in the VMM-37/Platero project operated by Ecopetrol.

26 new blocks for Parex

On January 6, 2022, the Colombian newspaper Portafolio reported that of the 69 blocks auctioned between 2019 and 2021, 26 blocks went to Parex Resources. Eighteen of the 26 bids by Parex were made in December 2021.

Chart from La Republica (January 2022).

We continue to follow this situation.

CEO of Canadian company Frontera Energy comments on Colombia’s oil tax and energy transition plans

Photo: Frontera Energy CEO Orlando Cabrales. Photo by Alexandra Ruiz/ Semana.

Orlando Cabrales Segovia, the Chief Executive Officer of the Canadian oil company Frontera Energy, has now publicly commented on the oil export tax, energy transition plans and fracking ban proposed by the Colombian government under newly-elected President Gustavo Petro and Vice-President Francia Márquez.

In August, The Guardian explained the government’s plan:

“If passed, the plan would raise taxes on the country’s highest earners – approximately 2% of Colombia’s population – cut tax benefits for the richest and fight tax evasion. The tax hikes would progressively increase as income increases. It would add an annual wealth tax on savings and property above $630,000, and would add a 10% tax on some of Colombia’s biggest exports – oil, coal and gold – after prices rise above a certain threshold.”

Reuters further notes:

“The reform would levy a 10% tax on oil exports once the price exceeds $48 per barrel. Oil prices are expected to average $104 per barrel this year, according to the Colombian Petroleum Association (ACP), which represents private producers, providing the state with an extra 24 trillion pesos [about USD $5.4 billion] in 2022.”

In another article, Reuters has also reported:

“Petro aims to reduce Colombia’s reliance on oil and coal exports through a gradual transition to solar and wind energy, while promoting agriculture, food production and tourism to boost the economy. …Petro has [also] pledged to stop all new oil exploration and construction of new large-scale open-pit mines, and to halt fracking pilot studies and the development of offshore oil and gas projects, saying it’s what ‘science tells us.'”

Cabrales comments on Petro’s policies

On oil policy, Cabrales has told El Colombiano: “We are convinced, after the dialogue that has been had with the Government, through the unions that represent us, of the strategic importance of this industry for the national economy.”

As for the energy transition to renewables, Cabrales adds: “It must be gradual and compatible with energy security, and with the country’s competitiveness. What is happening to Europe cannot happen to Colombia, which, due to having managed a disorderly and accelerated transition, today puts its energy security and economic competitiveness at risk. In addition, this must go hand in hand with a fiscal transition and an export transition.”

On the oil tax, he notes: “The sector has expressed its concern about the impact it would have on the level of future investments, to maintain the hydrocarbon production category that the country currently has.”

Cabrales also says: “This proposal as it is conceived would affect the level of investment for the sector. There is a direct relationship between what the tax reform proposes in this sense and the level of resources allocated by companies in the industry to maintain or grow their operations. This is fundamental to the Medium-Term Fiscal Framework. Regarding the issue of the tax on high prices, this already exists in the contracts, both with the National Hydrocarbons Agency and with Ecopetrol. Important resources are already entering the country for that income derived from the high prices in a barrel of crude oil.”

Cabrales has also spoken to Semana about fracking.

He tells Semana: “I think the Duque Government’s approach with scientific pilots to obtain supported information is the right one. One should not refuse this scientific approach, all the more so when the Council of State recently validated the legality of the 2014 technical standards that allow the activity of hydraulic fracturing. I don’t think it’s convenient to deny us that opportunity.”

Conflict in Casanare

Cabrales has been the CEO of Frontera since March 15, 2021.

On November 16 and 19, 2018, Frontera signed two agreements with the Ministry of Defence for USD $1.34 million to secure army protection for its Cubiro block operations in San Luis de Palenque, Casanare. Just days later, on November 27, 2018, a militarized operation involving a Black Hawk helicopter was launched that arrested the eight social leaders.

Video: A Black Hawk helicopter was used in the arrest of the social leaders.

A still from this video of the social leaders being taken into custody after their arrest.

Photo: PBI-Colombia accompanies a protest in San Luis de Palenque on December 14, 2018, demanding the release of the social leaders.

The eight social leaders had been protesting the impacts of Frontera on their community, roads and environment.

The UN Special Rapporteur on the situation of human rights defenders has raised concerns about “the apparent connection between Frontera Energy, the army’s 16th brigade and the Attorney General’s Support Office in this criminalization.”

The leaders were held in either prison or house arrest until 2020. On September 16, 2020, El Nuevo Oriente reported that a judge ordered their release, but that “the release decision was appealed by the Prosecutor’s Office and by the lawyers of Frontera Energy.”

On July 1 of this year, PBI-Canada and PBI-Colombia, along with the Committee of Solidarity with Political Prisoners (CSPP) and the Social Corporation for Community Advice and Training (COSPACC), travelled to the San Luis de Palenque to meet with the social leaders and take part in a community meeting at La Venturosa.

It is expected that they will be back in court this coming October 3-6.

We continue to follow this situation.

Photo: PBI visits San Luis de Palenque, July 1, 2022.

Two years ago a Colombian judge ordered the release of social leaders criminalized by Canada’s Frontera Energy

Community meeting at La Venturosa, July 1, 2022.

On September 16, 2020, El Nuevo Oriente reported that a judge had ordered the release of social leaders criminalized for protesting the Canadian oil company Frontera Energy’s Cubiro Block operations in San Luis de Palenque, Colombia.

The article further notes: “The release decision was appealed by the Prosecutor’s Office and by the lawyers of Frontera Energy.”

A few days later, El Nuevo Oriente also reported: “[Ferney Salcedo] never imagined that because of this social struggle, he would end up imprisoned, 500 days, without conviction, sent to one of the most fearsome prisons in the country (La Picota) and even affected by the fearsome Covid-19.”

“While he was in prison, his wife, Yulivel Leal, a companion of struggles and vigilance, lived her own ordeal: for the same cause, for being part of a terrorist group and promoting strikes and excesses against the oil company, she was imposed a measure of ‘home’ imprisonment that confined her to a house in Yopal, with her children, where she was also for the last two years.”

That article adds: “Ferney, Yulivel and six other friends and neighbors of the so-called Cubiro Oil Block, which extends through several villages of the border sector of Trinidad and San Luis de Palenque, were captured in November 2018 by an elite unit of military, police and prosecutors who deployed helicopters to remove him and 6 other peasants and businessmen from their farms, in the middle of a lawsuit filed by an employee of the oil company.”

On November 16 and 19, 2018, Frontera Energy signed two agreements with the Ministry of Defence for USD $1.34 million to secure army protection. Just days later, on November 27, 2018, the operation was launched that arrested the eight social leaders.

They are now expected to be back in court on October 3-6 of this year as the criminalization/judicialization process against them continues.

PBI meets with the community

On July 1, 2022, PBI-Canada and PBI-Colombia, along with the Committee of Solidarity with Political Prisoners (CSPP) and the Social Corporation for Community Advice and Training (COSPACC), travelled to the San Luis de Palenque to meet with the social leaders and take part in a community meeting at La Venturosa.

We note that the Cubiro block produced, according to the company, 2,410 barrels per day of light and medium crude oil in 2021. The company has reportedly “installed some 20 platforms in the six districts of the municipality” and that the royalties for the company “have totaled some $30 million USD since 2015.”

We further note that in 2021, Canada imported 10,872 barrels of oil per day from Colombia (for a total of about 3.19 million barrels of oil that year). It’s possible that some of the oil being exported to Canada (specifically New Brunswick) comes from the San Luis de Palenque, Casanare operations.

We continue to follow this struggle and hope to be able to hold a webinar featuring some of the social leaders in mid-October, shortly after their upcoming court appearance.

Environmental defenders present 174,314 signatures in support of Bill 114 banning fracking in Colombia

Video: Box representing signatures is handed to Environment Minister Susana Muhamad.

On September 15 a public hearing was held in Bogota on Bill 114, legislation that would prohibit fracking in Colombia.

Senator Esmeralda Hernández, who supports Bill 114, says: “For five hours we listened to communities in territories where ‘fracking’ would be carried out, we explained our reasons why this harmful practice should be banned. We trust in the support of the Congress of the Republic to take care of life above private businesses.”

Infobae reports: “On August 10, the Minister of Environment and Sustainable Development, Susana Muhamad, filed the bill that seeks to close the door to ‘fracking’ in Colombia.”

The article highlights: “At the hearing, the head of the environmental portfolio received 174,314 signatures collected by a group of young environmentalists and that according to them, ‘represent the will of civil society with which they request the national government not to allow fracking and reformulate the policy of just energy transition in the country’.”

Photo by Boyaca le Informa.

El Espectador further explains that Bill 114 calls for “the prohibition of implementing fracking as a technique for obtaining resources such as fossil fuels in unconventional deposits; a ban on the exploration and production of hydrocarbons in unconventional fields; the prohibition on the issuance of environmental licenses for the exploitation of hydrocarbons in unconventional deposits; considers a term for concluding the contracts signed prior to this initiative, as well as a term for establishing a just transition policy and the substitution of fossil fuels.”

That article also notes: “Currently in Colombia fracking has a presence with 2 projects: Kalé and Platero in Puerto Wilches. The first is questioned for not having carried out a prior consultation with the community; the second does not have an environmental license.”

On June 28 this year, Peace Brigades International, along with the Regional Corporation for the Defence of Human Rights (CREDHOS), visited Puerto Wilches to hear from community members opposed to fracking.

We heard from them about threats and attacks against environmental defenders who have been vocal about the need to stop fracking.

Ecopetrol/Scotiabank

On August 31, three weeks after the Petro government was sworn into office, Semana reported: “Ecopetrol said in May that it expected to carry out the first drilling in Kalé in October of this year, while in Platero it would do so in the first quarter of 2023.”

On September 13, Cuarto de Hora reported: “Ecopetrol informed the National Hydrocarbons Agency and the National Environmental Licensing Agency that it will suspend for a period of 90 days the fracking contracts.”

We note that Toronto-based Scotiabank provided to Ecopetrol, the operator of both fracking pilot projects, USD $665 million in 2018, another $666.67 million in 2020, and $1.7 billion in 2021 for a total of $3.0 billion in financing.

Al Jazeera has reported: “Local environmental defenders [opposed to fracking] and a representative of the JEP [the Special Jurisdiction for Peace] told Al Jazeera that they suspected a connection between the paramilitary groups intimidating them and the state-owned Ecopetrol, which is behind the fracking project.”

Sintana Energy

We also note that Toronto-based Sintana Energy Inc. has highlighted that it “holds an undivided 30% non-operated participation interest in a Contract for Exploration and Production for Block VMM-37” where the Platero project would be conducted.

In April 2021, the company stated: “Sintana is encouraged by the ANH’s [National Hydrocarbons Agency] acceptance of ExxonMobil’s bid for Project Platero and its award of a CEPI [Special Research Project Contract/pilot project] contract. The Company’s support for Project Platero is made even though the Government’s process excluded an important segment of the petroleum industry by not allowing smaller companies, such as companies the size of Sintana, to participate in CEPI bids.”

Parex Resources

In March 2019, Reuters reported: “At least five companies are interested in six fracking blocs in Colombia…” In that article, Maria Fernanda Suarez, who was the Colombian Mines and Energy Minister at that time, named Calgary-based Parex Resources as one of the companies interested in the fracking blocs.

Then on July 9, 2022, Infobae reported that the new government’s intention to ban fracking could be an issue “for the four oil multinationals that signed the contracts with the Colombian State, for the commercial and experimental development of crude oil and gas in unconventional fields in Colombia” including “Parex Resources (with one contract)…”

That exploration and production (E&P) contract was signed on September 18, 2014, for Block VMM-9 but has been suspended, according to Parex in this December 2021 report, “due the lack of regulations to explore and exploit unconventional hydrocarbons.”

Canacol Energy

Argus Media has reported that Calgary-based Canacol Energy had also been expected to apply for a fracking pilot project.

Furthermore, Valora Analitik reported in April 2021 that Canacol Energy CEO Charle Gamba saw the approval of the Platero and Kale fracking pilot projects as “positive steps towards realizing the commercial potential of the unconventional shale oil field in Colombia and specifically for the resources prospects that we [Canacol] have through our position in the Middle Magdalena Valley basin.”

Gamba said this despite previously acknowledging there are: “communities who remain heavily opposed to fracking from an environmental perspective.”

We continue to follow this situation.

PBI highlights the right to water in Honduras, Mexico, Colombia and Guatemala at Interactive Dialogue with Special Rapporteur

Kim-Mai Vu

On September 14, Kim-Mai Vu of Peace Brigades International presented at the United Nations in Geneva during the Interactive Dialogue with Pedro Arrojo, the Special Rapporteur on the human rights to safe drinking water and sanitation.

In this presentation, she stated:

“Thank you, Mr. President,

We welcome the report of the Rapporteur on the human rights of indigenous peoples to water and sanitation.

In Honduras, we are concerned about the complaints about the privatization of drinking water, contamination and depletion of water sources as a result of extractive projects in Tolupan territory, such as Las Vegas de Tepemechín and Locomapa, and in protected areas, such as Guapinol and Sierra de Agalta. It is urgent to guarantee the protection of communities and organizations that defend the right to water.

In Mexico, Ejidos de Ayala (Morelos), denounce that the Federal Electricity Commission occupies daily 21 million liters of water for operation tests of the thermoelectric plant in Huexca, without its consent. After judicial appeals, CONAGUA recognized that the diversion of water affects its rights of access to water, and demands a prompt resolution of the amparo lawsuits.

In Colombia, territorial communities have historically suffered persecution and forced displacement: it is the case of Putumayo, Magdalena Medio and Chocó, and of organizations such as Adispa, Justice and Peace Commission, Aguawil, Fedepesan and Credhos, who denounce corruption and contamination of rivers and swamps by companies national and transnational. To date there has been no progress in the investigations of the Prosecutor’s Office.

In Guatemala, for many communities, access to water is increasingly at risk, especially due to large extensions of sugar, palm oil and other monocultures. These have led to the deforestation and greater drought, in addition to consuming a very high percentage of water. They are particularly concerned sugar mills on the south coast.

It is necessary that these four countries invite the Special Rapporteur for an official visit.”

The video of Vu’s presentation can be viewed here (at 1:18:39 to 1:20:16).

Franciscans International

PBI was also part of a joint statement with Dominicans for justice and peace and Franciscans International (at 1:21:49) that concluded:

“We urge the Council to urge Guatemala to adopt a law that recognizes the human right to water, to respect the free, prior and informed consent of indigenous peoples and to cease and investigate cases of intimidation and criminalization of defenders of water and the environment.”

Pedro Arrojo

In his comments, the Special Rapporteur stated (at 1:31:01):

“To the indigenous peoples and social movements, like Peace Brigades International – so dear to me from the past, and so many other movements, let’s prepare the Social Water Forum, let’s prepare the Water conference in New York. This time it is not a question of organizing alternative forums, dear friends, but of developing this historic opportunity for dialogue with the United Nations to its full potential.”

The Social Forum will take place both in Geneva and online on November 3-4 of this year, while the UN 2023 Water Conference will be in New York on March 22-24, 2023.

For more, please see the Human Rights Council press release: Special Rapporteur on the Negative Impact of Unilateral Coercive Measures Says Guiding Principles Need to Be Drafted to Protect the Rights and Lives of People.

Please also see the PBI-Switzerland article HRC51: PBI au Conseil des droits de l’homme.

PBI-Colombia accompanies CREDHOS at meeting with Director of Human Rights of the Ministry of the Interior

On September 14, CREDHOS tweeted:

“CREDHOS [Regional Corporation for the Defence of Human Rights], FAPUMUCAN, FEDEPESAN [Federation of Santander Fishers for Tourism and Environment], and ASOVIMAG [Organization of Victims of Magdalena Medio] talk with the Director of Human Rights of the Ministry of the Interior [Franklin Castañeda] about the situation of Human Rights and the risks that communities and social leaders are experiencing today.

The organizations request the urgent installation of the territorial table of guarantees and the installation of the PMUV [Puestos de Mando Unificado por la Vida/Command Posts Unified for Life] in the Magdalena Medio region.”

Infobae has explained: “PMUVs are installed as a tool so that mayors and local governments can respond with humanitarian and non-military actions. …This is the strategy that the National Government has implemented in 65 municipalities of the country through the external circular of September 3, 2022, where powers are given to local leaders to request, if necessary, help from the Public Force or government and State institutions in order to preserve security [including the safety of human rights defenders] and public order.”

Two weeks ago, El Colombiano reported:

“As part of President Gustavo Petro’s visit to the municipality of Ituango, north of Antioquia, a new name was announced that will make up his cabinet.

This is Franklin Castañeda, who will assume the Human Rights Directorate of the Ministry of the Interior.

Castañeda had been serving as president of the Committee of Solidarity with Political Prisoners (CSPP) and was the winner of the 2020 National Human Rights Award.

The CSPP, it is worth mentioning, was founded in 1973, being the first human rights organization in the country.”

PBI-Colombia has accompanied the CSPP since 1998 and CREDHOS since 1994.

PBI-Honduras accompanies ARCAH at mobilization against water privatization at World Bank in Tegucigalpa

On September 14, PBI-Honduras tweeted:

“In the National Coalition of Organizations in Defense of Water in Honduras, they deliver a document expressing concern about ‘the World Bank’s participation in the water decentralization-privatization process.’”

On Facebook, PBI-Honduras also noted:

“Yesterday we accompanied ARCAH [the Alternative for Community and Environmental Reclamation of Honduras] and other organizations that look after the defense of the right to water, to a mobilization outside the offices of the World Bank in Tegucigalpa.

The organizations, united in the National Coalition of Water Defense Organizations in Honduras, delivered a document in which they express concern over “the participation of the World Bank in the process of decentralization of water, i.e., its privatization, which implies the violation of the right to water.

In the points mentioned in the letter, there is a request for meeting so that organizations can present to the World Bank the various concerns and delve into the issue of the right to water in Honduras.”

On September 8, Criterio.hn reported:

“At least 92 of Honduras’ 298 municipalities have reportedly privatized drinking water services through a scheme in which banks in the national financial system and transnational corporations have become the main administrative managers.

This was denounced by the Alternative of Community and Environmental Claim (ARCAH), an environmental platform opposed to the expansion of the extractive model of natural resources in Honduras.”

They have stated: “ARCAH denounces again the process of privatization of water in Honduras, we strongly emphasize that water is a sacred element that, putting its future in the hands of the private sector, is nothing more than a hard blow to the peoples, which perpetuates the extractivist, mercantile and capital-accumulating gaze with which Banco Ficohsa and other financial institutions involved see the common goods of nature.”

Peace Brigades International has also highlighted complaints about the privatization of drinking water, contamination and depletion of water sources as a result of extractive projects in Tolupán territory, such as Las Vegas de Tepemechín and Locomapa, and in protected areas, such as Guapinol and Sierra de Agalta. It is urgent to guarantee the protection of communities and organizations that defend the right to water.