Home Blog

Activity Update: The first-year of the Peace Brigades International-Canada Research Unit (PBI-CRU)

Photo: PBI-Canada and PBI-Honduras meet with the CNTC union in Tegucigalpa to discuss research topics of interest to them, March 2026.

The Peace Brigades International-Canada Research Unit (PBI-CRU) was launched in June 2025 as part of our longstanding commitment to the holistic protective accompaniment of human rights defenders.

The intent of this research unit is to generate information to connect the corporations, banks and pension funds located in the Global North with the companies involved/complicit in the attacks on the organizations, defenders and communities we accompany in Colombia, Guatemala, Honduras and Mexico, in order to strengthen our advocacy efforts and overall protection strategies.

Context

We work within the context that:

-There were 790 business-related attacks against human rights defenders in 2025 (Business and Human Rights Centre/BHRC).

-53 human rights defenders who spoke out about business-related harms were killed in 2025 (BHRC).

-The Americas remain the most dangerous region for human rights defenders in 2025: 165 human rights defenders were killed in Colombia, 43 in Mexico, 13 in Honduras, and 10 in Guatemala (Front Line Defenders).

-The perpetrators of the killings of the 358 human rights defenders in 2025 are largely unknown; 159 of the killings were committed by unknown actors; 196 were allegedly committed by state and non-state actors (Front Line Defenders).

-There were 5 extra-judicial killings of workers and their representatives in the Americas, with 3 killings documented in Mexico, 2 killings in Colombia, and 1 forced disappearance in Mexico (International Trade Union Confederation).

Research articles

We have published: Network Against Anti-Trade Union Violence remembers the trade union commitment of Juan López in Honduras (April 2026). Prior to that, we posted (and have reposted within other articles): Research on the ownership structure of the Los Pinares megaproject in Honduras (June 2025).

We have published: PBI-Canada congratulates the Peaceful Resistance of La Puya as ICSID arbitration panel rejects claim by US mining company (January 2026). Prior to that, we had posted (and reposted in multiple articles) the links between this struggle and a Canadian mining corporation: Research on the involvement of Vancouver-based Radius Gold in the La Puya mine in Guatemala (September 2025).

We have published: Colombian environmental defender Jani Silva continues to face threats, highlights need to improve Protection Mechanism (December 2025). We have a research paper ready for publication that links the risk of environmental harm in the Amazon region to a Vancouver-based mining company and the upcoming PDAC mining convention in Toronto in March 2027.

We have published: Despite documented rights violations, Mexican military to attend the CANSEC arms show in Ottawa (May 2026). Prior to this, we had posted: Research on the links between Canadian companies and the Interoceanic Corridor of the Isthmus of Tehuantepec in Mexico (September 2025). The Mexican military, including the Army, Navy and National Guard, has been implicated in multiple incidents of attacks against human rights defenders opposed to this megaproject.

We have also developed research to strengthen various articles and build collaboration with accompanied organizations, including: Initial research survey on the inclusion of union activists in Protection Mechanisms for human rights defenders and journalists (January 2026); PBI-Guatemala accompanies REDSAG and the Pajales Sis community council on tour; observes damage by local sugar mill to river (May 2026); PBI-Canada notes CESPAD report that cites use of military equipment in eviction of CNTC union members in Honduras (May 2026); and PBI-Colombia accompanies Nomadesc at ceremony in Yumbo for those killed in the National Strike, including Kevin Anthony Agudelo (May 2026).

Amplification

We have also sought to amplify research produced by other organizations, including: International Trade Union Confederation: “Northrop is a serial violator of consumer and labour protections” (April 2026).

Collaboration

And for the first time ever, we wrote a chapter in the Annual Federal Budget (AFB) 2026 published by the Canadian Centre for Policy Alternatives (CCPA). The soon-to-be published AFB Defence chapter includes analysis and a series of recommendations based on a human rights and peace-building perspective.

Next steps

In the coming year we hope to continue to collaborate with other Peace Brigades International entities in the identification of priority research areas, the publication and amplification of that research, and to integrate that research more fully into advocacy and accompaniment strategies.

We acknowledge the support of the Unifor Social Justice Fund in enabling the formation, continuation and further development/strengthening of the Peace Brigades International-Canada Research Unit (PBI-CRU).

Impact assessment: PBI-Canada compiles PBI accompanied movement advances and wins in 2025/26

Photo: Fedepesan president Yuli Velásquez comments on landmark court ruling in Colombia, May 2026.

2026

Human rights lawyer long-accompanied by PBI-Colombia welcomes confirmation of ruling against Santiago Uribe (June 2026)

Three alleged perpetrators arrested in the murder of human rights defender Juan López in Honduras (May 2026)

PBI-Canada congratulates Fedepesan and Credhos on landmark court ruling in fight to protect the San Silvestre wetlands (May 2026)

UN High Commissioner Volker Türk affirms need to strengthen Protection Mechanism after meeting with Espacio OSC and PBI-Mexico (April 2026)

PBI-Mexico shares news of win by Peoples’ Front in Defence of Land and Water in struggle against landfill in San Pedro Cholula, Puebla (March 2026)

PBI-Canada congratulates the Nydia Erika Bautista Foundation on the presidential signing of Law 2364, the Women Searchers Law (January 2026)

2025

PBI-Canada congratulates the Peaceful Resistance of La Puya as ICSID arbitration panel rejects claim by US mining company (December 2025)

The Corporation for Judicial Freedom celebrates win against the AngloGold Ashanti Québradona project in Colombia (December 2025)

The PBI-Colombia accompaniment of lawyer Daniel Prado and the sentencing of Santiago Uribe in the 12 Apostles trial (November 2025)

PBI-Guatemala accompanies court hearing in which officials sentenced to prison for the Hogar Seguro fire (August 2025)

PBI-Guatemala notes cancellation of environmental licences for Canadian mining company on Q’eqchi’ lands (July 2025)

PBI-Kenya accompanied Phyllis Omido and CJGEA cautiously celebrate halt to proposed nuclear power plant (February 2025)

PBI-Colombia accompanied CREDHOS founding member David Rabelo Crespo acquitted after 15 years (February 2025)

COPINH celebrates “popular victory” as DESA manager sentenced as “instigator” in the murder of Berta Caceres (February 2025)

PBI-UK notes win by farmers against LSE listed mining company in Mexico, the environmental defenders killed after denouncing abuses (January 2025)

Peace Brigades International-Canada extends its solidarity, support and congratulations on these wins accomplished by organizations, defenders and communities.

Additional reading:

Four Big Wins for Human Rights Defenders in 2025 (PBI-UK article): “With thanks to PBI’s Canada Office for the additional reporting and case compilation.”

Confirmación de la sentencia contra Santiago Uribe – gracias al abogado de las víctimas, acompañado de PBI Colombia (PBI-Colombia article): “We would like to thank PBI Canada and Brent Patterson for publishing this article, which we are reproducing here in Spanish translation.”

PBI-Canada participates in APG-organized call with Global Affairs Canada on the Mexico-Canada Human Rights Dialogue

PBI-Canada has been following with interest the Mexico-Canada Dialogue on Human Rights and Multilateral Issues that took place in Ottawa on May 20, 2026. We have highlighted the need to strengthen the Protection Mechanism for Human Rights Defenders and Journalists in Mexico, both in a preparatory call with Global Affairs Canada on March 27 and in a follow-up meeting with them held on June 15.

Both calls were organized by the Americas Police Group (APG).

In this follow-up meeting, we learned:

1-a topic of discussion at the Dialogue was freedom of expression and the protection of human rights defenders (about 30-40 minutes on the agenda)

2-the discussion acknowledged the growing threat to human rights defenders and journalists, including the context of disinformation

3-a “substantive discussion” on the Protection Mechanism took place during the Dialogue; this involved highlighting Canada’s “Voices at Risk” guidelines, and asking Mexican officials their understanding of how the Mechanism is working

4-the recommendations – developed by Espacio OSC and forwarded to Global Affairs Canada by PBI-Canada – to strengthen the Protection Mechanism had been shared with Mexican officials

5-the preferred method for Global Affairs Canada when it wants to financially support an issue of concern in Mexico is through a United Nations agency (e.g., $9.9 million in funding for United Nations-led projects to support migrant integration initiatives in Mexico and combat the illicit production and trafficking of fentanyl).

In this call, PBI-Canada noted that several reports on the situation in Mexico in 2025 had been released after the Dialogue that point to an ongoing and concerning situation: 43 human rights defenders killed (Front Line Defenders); 3 union activists killed, 1 disappeared (International Trade Union Confederation); 41 business-related attacks against defenders, with 30 of those attacks in the mining sector.

Global Affairs Canada noted that these reports are concerning, that they take them seriously, and that their role is to encourage Canadian companies follow the guidelines and standards for responsible business conduct. Their interest is for Canadian companies to be seen as good investors.

We will continue to follow the issue of the Protection Mechanism, the Canadian government’s elimination of the Canadian Office for Responsible Enterprise (CORE), and the process to update the “Voices at Risk” guidelines.

The next Mexico-Canada Dialogue on Human Rights and Multilateral Issues is scheduled to take place in Mexico City in 2027.

Additional reading

PBI-Canada following the Mexico-Canada Dialogue on Human Rights and Multilateral Issues in Ottawa (May 20, 2026)

PBI-Canada highlights the need to strengthen the Protection Mechanism in Mexico at APG-organized call with Global Affairs Canada (March 27, 2026)

Mexican trade delegation to visit Canada on May 7-9; the call to strengthen the Protection Mechanism continues (March 13, 2026)

PBI-Canada and PBI-Mexico meet with the Embassy of Canada in Mexico to highlight the need to strengthen the Protection Mechanism (February 27, 2026).

Gitxsan, Kitigan Zibi Anishinabeg and Wolastoq land defenders oppose mines linked to U.S. weapons production

Photo: Gitxsan land defender Kolin Sutherland-Wilson speaks at ILPS conference in Ottawa; May 26, 2026. Photo by Radyo Migrante TO.

The Canadian Association of Defence and Security Industries (CADSI) has posted on LinkedIn: “CADSI’s VP of Communications & Government Relations, Nicolas Todd attended the Critical Minerals for Defence this week in Toronto. We shared insight into how Canada’s critical mineral industry plays a role within this new defence ecosystem, notably its effect on industrial capacity and supply chains.”

Speakers at that June 9-19, 2026, conference also included representatives from the Marten Falls First Nation, Lockheed Martin, Natural Resources Canada, Export Development Canada, the Department of National Defence, the United States Air Force, UK Export Finance, the European Union Delegation to the United States, the Government of Ontario, the Canada Infrastructure Bank, and Lomiko Metals.

Gitxsan land defender Kolin Sutherland-Wilson has highlighted the connection between corporate mining on Indigenous lands in Canada and weapons production. At a Palestine solidarity rally in Victoria, British Columbia in February 2026, Sutherland-Wilson expressed his opposition to “mines to fuel their need for the rare earth elements and critical minerals to build their weapons that they employ against peoples all around the world.” He concluded with “Free Palestine!”

The Tyee has reported that Vancouver-based Defense Metals is proposing the Wicheeda project, located 80 kilometres north of Prince George, that contains neodymium and praseodymium, rare earth elements that can be used in the manufacturing of military equipment. The Tyee notes: “In 2020, [Defense Metals] brought in two strategic advisers [one from Lockheed Martin, the other who had been with the CIA] to help with business development and securing purchase agreements.”

Last month, Shiri Pasternak and Nessie Nankivell wrote: “Even as Prime Minister Mark Carney touts his plans to protect Canada’s economic sovereignty, the country’s critical minerals are making their way into U.S. weapons.”

The article explains: “Nickel, copper, graphite, cobalt, tungsten, chromium, and rare earth elements are not just inputs for batteries and wind turbines. They are also needed to build fighter jets, drones, missiles, radar systems, submarines, armour, and ammunition. …Starting in 2022, the U.S. Department of War began pouring millions of dollars into Canadian mining companies extracting critical minerals. …Over just two years in 2024 and 2025, the Pentagon invested over $78 million USD in companies operating mining projects in Canada: Fortune Minerals, Lomiko Metals, Fireweed Metals, Northcliff Resources, Nano One Materials, and Electra Battery Materials.”

Pasternak and Nankivell cite the example of the Lomiko Metals La Loutre graphite mine near Duhamel, Quebec, about 120 kilometres north of Ottawa. They note: “It secured an $8.4 million USD grant from the Pentagon, matched by a further $4.9 million CAD grant from Natural Resources Canada. …Canada’s environmental assessment processes do not ask where minerals will ultimately go once they leave the mine site. They do not ask whether extracted materials will power batteries or weapons.”

They add: “The La Loutre graphite mine has faced strong opposition from the Kitigan Zibi Anishinabeg First Nation.”

And Pasternak and Nankivell have also noted: “In New Brunswick, the proposed Sisson tungsten project, owned by Northcliff Resources, received $15 million USD in Pentagon funding. Tungsten carbide, an exceptionally hard metal, is used in armour-piercing ammunition. Wolastoqey leaders have opposed the project for years.”

The NB Media Co-op has further reported: “[Elder Alma Brooks has] pointed to Israel’s prolonged and devastating U.S.-backed assault on the Gaza Strip, ‘a genocide that’s happening right under the nose of the world’”.

That article further notes: “[Wolastoq Grand Chief Ron] Tremblay said the Wolastoq Grand Council rejects activities contributing to war and what he called the ‘continuum of genocide’ in places such as the Gaza Strip and the West Bank.”

The risk of attacks against defenders

In their Global Analysis 2025/26 report issued today, Front Line Defenders documents that the “most targeted areas of human rights defence” worldwide are “land, environmental and peasant communities’ rights” (23.46% of the human rights defenders killed in 2025) and “Indigenous peoples’ rights” (17.03% of those killed).

And in their September 2025 report, Global Witness noted: “Once again, mining emerged as the deadliest sector, with at least 29 related cases in 2024. Next came logging with eight cases and agribusiness with four. Road-building and infrastructure projects, poaching and hydropower have also driven deadly attacks in 2024.”

We continue to follow this with concern.

Additional reading: ‘Our minerals could be used to annex us’: why Canada doesn’t want US mining (Sara Hashemi, The Guardian, January 5, 2026); Elbows up? Canada is letting Pentagon take ‘unprecedented’ stakes in Canadian mines (Shiri Pasternak and Nessie Nankivell, The Breach, May 22, 2026); Wolastoqey land defenders reject the proposed Sisson open-pit tungsten mine and weapons production (PBI-Canada article, December 2, 2025) and Why Is the US War Department Buying into a BC Mining Company? (Amanda Follett Hosgood, The Tyee, October 16, 2025).

Human rights defenders block access to Eurosatory arms fair near Paris to protest Israeli weapons companies

Photo by Association France Palestine Solidarité.

This morning, the Dublin, Ireland-based Front Line Defenders and HRD Memorial released their Global Analysis 2025/26 report that documents that Palestine was the second most deadly country for human rights defenders in 2025 (160 HRDs were killed in Colombia, 43 in Palestine, 43 in Mexico, that along with other killings total at least 358 human rights defenders from 28 different countries).

Guerre à la guerre (War on War) has been organizing against the Eurosatory arms show, the world’s largest land and air defence trade show, that is taking place this week in Villepinte situated north-east of Paris.

Their listed activities include: “Monday, June 15, in Villepinte to protest the opening of the trade show!”

Anadolu Français now reports: “Pro-Palestinian activists on Monday blocked the road leading to the Eurosatory international arms fair, held in Villepinte, near Paris, to protest against the participation of Israeli companies in the event.”

That article continues: “Gathered near the exhibition center, the demonstrators waved Palestinian and Lebanese flags as well as placards bearing the slogan ‘Stop the war profiteers.’ …The demonstrators also staged a sit-in on a roundabout near the exhibition centre. …The mobilization took place to the sound of several songs and music, including the Italian song ‘Bella Ciao’.”

The Activestills Collective has also posted on Instagram: “TODAY. Protesters block the entrance at the opening of Eurosatory, Europe’s largest defence show, to demonstrate against the participation of Israeli firms, in Villepinte, north of Paris. The protesters were held for three hours by police at the site and several were taken into the police stations. Although Israel will not have a national pavilion at Eurosatory, Israeli companies will still present their products. The French Minister for Foreign Affairs claims he informed the organisers that only defensive equipment could be displayed. The demonstration was co-organised by the Stop Arming Israel France group and the collective ‘guerre à la guerre’, which have organised many demonstrations and actions in front of French companies selling weapons to Israel, or components to be used in Israeli ammunition or military equipment. Sales to a state committing genocide, as Israel is doing in Gaza, could amount to war crimes and is in violation of both EU and domestic French laws.”

Photos from the protest can be found at Anadolu English, plus from the Activestills Collective, along with video from Alma Plus TV, additional videos from Sputnik Nusantara, and photos from BDS France. Video still below from Sputnik Africa.

Agence France-Presse additionally reports: “Israeli private companies are allowed this year to display ‘defensive’ weapons, while in 2024 France had initially decreed a ‘total’ ban on Israeli participation, due to the war in Gaza. With their high-performance ‘Iron Dome’ missile defence system, the Israelis will be able to promote capabilities ‘that have never been so needed’, according to the show’s curator. He warned against ‘ambiguous stands’ also displaying offensive weapons, which are banned, implying that such participants would be banned from the show.”

Haaretz also reported: “Among the exhibitors were dozens of small and medium-sized Israeli companies. But on the eve of the opening, several discovered that their stands had been sealed off behind gray plywood panels.” And The Jerusalem Post noted: “Rafael Advanced Defense Systems, IAI-Israel Aerospace Industries, and Elbit Systems were allowed to display their platforms.”

BHRC report

In their report Navigating a global crossroads: Human rights defenders and business in 2025, the London, United Kingdom-based Business and Human Rights Centre (BHRC) documented: “Protesters at arms fairs targeting companies selling weapons to Israel were detained in the United States, Turkey, Switzerland and France, whilst activists in New Zealand faced violence for protesting the militarisation of aerospace technology and its uses against civilian populations.”

Overall, the Business and Human Rights Centre documented 46 attacks against human rights defenders raising concerns about arms and weapons companies and their complicity in conflict and genocide.

The Ottawa-based Canadian Association of Defence and Security Industries (CADSI), whose members include the world’s largest weapons companies, has posted on social media that it will be at Eurosatory this week.

Movement building

On May 7, 2026, PBI-Canada participated in the “Shut It Down: Global Actions Disrupting the Arms Trade” webinar featuring movement activists from Stop Arming Israel-France, Desarma Madrid, Campaign Against Arms Trade (CAAT-United Kingdom), alongside Labour Against the Arms Trade and the Shut Down CANSEC campaign in Canada. The webinar was organized jointly by the Shut Down CANSEC campaign and the International League of Peoples’ Struggle (ILPS).

PBI-Canada also participated in two other webinars this year focused on the implications and consequences of the arms trade organized by the Canadian Friends Service Committee (CFSC-Quakers) that featured speakers from Project Ploughshares (based in Waterloo, Ontario) and the Quaker Peace Hub (based in Birmingham, England).

We will continue to look for updates and analysis posted on Instagram by Guerre à la guerre here.

For more about the Shut Down CANSEC campaign, click here.

As part of its commitment to the holistic accompaniment of human rights defenders and journalists, Peace Brigades International-Canada is observing the intersection between the export of weapons, the implications of those weapons on organizations, defenders and communities around the world, and the increasing criminalization of those who are challenging the arms trade.

More than 358 human rights defenders were killed around the world in 2025: Front Line Defenders and HRD Memorial report

The Global Analysis 2025/26 report produced by Front Line Defenders and HRD Memorial has found: “At least 358 human rights defenders from 28 different countries were killed in 2025 in an attempt to silence them and put an end to their work.”

The data on the number of human rights defenders killed in 2025 includes: Colombia – 165; Mexico – 43; Palestine – 43; Brazil – 22; Honduras – 13; Guatemala – 10; Philippines – 4; Nicaragua – 3; Kenya – 3; Indonesia – 1.

The report adds: “At the time of publication, the HRD Memorial continued to research and conduct verifications on the additional killings of 119 individuals perpetrated in Bangladesh, Chile, Côte d’Ivoire, Cuba, Ecuador, Gaza (Palestine), Iran, Kenya, Mozambique, Myanmar, Nicaragua, Philippines, Sudan, Syria, Tanzania, Uzbekistan, Venezuela and Yemen.”

Canada

There are two references to Canada in the report:

CRIMINALISATION OF SOLIDARITY: “In Canada, such patterns were mirrored through courtordered precautionary measures restricting proPalestinian demonstrations in university spaces, as well as police raids and criminalisation campaigns against defenders linked to organisations stigmatised as ‘terrorist’ for their criticism of Israel. These practices contributed to a chilling effect on proPalestinian human rights work, discouraging defenders from engaging in legitimate advocacy.”

RESTRICTIVE LEGISLATION: “In June, Bill 5 (Protect Ontario by Unleashing our Economy Act) was approved by the Ontario Government despite widespread condemnation by environmental, indigenous and labour rights defenders. Bill 5 could open the door to the designation of the Ring of Fire, a mineral-rich region in Northern Ontario, as a ‘special economic zone’, ignoring environmental regulations, bypassing First Nations and increasing the presence of extractive projects.”

Partners

The report also notes: “For 2025, the HRD Memorial has counted on the invaluable support of the following organisations and individuals to verify cases of killings of HRDs [including] Peace Brigades International (Nicaragua).”

To read the 84-page report, click here.

PBI-Mexico accompanies National March in Mexico City against the forced disappearance of persons in lead-up to FIFA World Cup

Photo by Cerezo Committee.

On May 30, the Cerezo Committee posted on social media: “We wrapped up the march and activities for International Week of the Detained and Disappeared; the Zócalo had more police than dignity—long live FIFA!”

During the march, Hector Cerezo posted on social media: “We remain surrounded by Mexico City government police. We are next to the Supreme Court of Justice of the Nation. We are not allowed to enter the Zócalo; we are confined to the protest site in front of the Supreme Court of Justice of the Nation. We hold the head of government responsible for the increased repression.”

Video still by Cerezo Committee.

Less than two weeks later, on June 10, the Cerezo Committee also posted on social media: “A government blockade in Mexico City to prevent the march of families of people who have been forcibly disappeared or abducted by private individuals from reaching the soccer stadium.”

This again was in the context of the FIFA World Cup that began the following day, June 11, and will continue to July 19, 2026.

The German news service Deutsche Welle also reports: “Contingents of teachers, relatives of the disappeared and students converged early this Thursday [June 11] in the vicinity of the stadium, but they were met with a heavy police deployment. …’Mexico champion in disappearance!’ was one of the most repeated chants by the demonstrators, from different groups that share a rejection of Mexico hosting another World Cup while facing the violence of organized crime.”

This huge strike and day of mobilization was reportedly organized by the National Coordinator of Education Workers (CNTE) and the mobilizations of collectives of relatives and mothers searching for disappeared persons.

Ahead of this, Amnesty International Amnesty announced that it would act as an observer during the protest and reiterated its concern about the risks faced by women human rights defenders in Mexico.

#FútbolConMemoria

PBI-Mexico also accompanies Espacio OSC.

On June 9, Espacio OSC posted: “Within the framework of the 2026 FIFA World Cup Mexico-United States-Canada, the Space of Civil Society Organizations for the Protection of Human Rights Defenders and Journalists (Espacio OSC) launched the #FútbolConMemoria [Soccer With Memory] campaign, an initiative that seeks to vindicate the memory of those who have been victims of violence for exercising their rights to defend rights and freedom of expression.”

According to official figures, more than 130,000 missing people are registered in Mexico. Demographics of this number are not available, so it is not presently known how many of the forcibly disappeared are union members or organized workers, though they are at risk in this context.

We continue to follow this.

PBI-Canada attentive to UN Human Rights Council session on digital surveillance, notes RCMP surveillance of Indigenous land defenders

Image from cover of “Pushed into the Shadows” report.

PBI-Canada is attentive to the upcoming session on June 23, 2026, at the United Nations Human Rights Council in Geneva, Switzerland on the erosion of the rights to assembly and association due to digital surveillance.

The United Nations Special Rapporteur on the rights to freedom of peaceful assembly and of association, Gina Romero, has issued a new report on the threat to these rights posed by digital surveillance.

The 78-page report co-authored by Romero can be found at “Pushed into the Shadows”: Evidencing digital surveillance chilling effects and the erosion of the rights to freedom of assembly and of association.

Online monitoring and drones

The “Pushed into the Shadows” report states: “Authorities employ a blend of covert, hidden and online monitoring (including data scraping) strategies with more overt visible forms (such as surveillance drones).”

“Open-source intelligence monitoring”

In April 2026, The Tyee reported that a freedom of information request found that “CRU-BC Intel” is “actively monitoring opposition” to the Prince Rupert Gas Transmission line, as well as “anticipated protest activity” that an RCMP spokesperson says “has come to our attention through open source intelligence monitoring” that, according to the RCMP in an internal document, includes “online activity”.

Journalist Amanda Follett Hosgood explains in her article: “The Critical Incident Secretariat [has] a biweekly meeting that brings together several provincial ministries, resource sector regulators and a controversial RCMP protest-policing unit called the Critical Response Unit — British Columbia, also known as CRU-BC.”

Surveillance by drones

The Guardian has also reported: “Documents show that ahead of the [January 7, 2019] raid, the RCMP deployed an array of surveillance, including heavily armed police patrols, a jet boat, helicopter, drone technology, heat-sensing cameras and close monitoring of key land defenders’ movements and social media postings.”

More on this at: RCMP use helicopters, airplanes and drones to surveil and arrest Wet’suwet’en land defenders (PBI-Canada article, May 21, 2023).

Surveillance of political activism

The “Pushed into the Shadows” report also notes: “Civic and political activism is increasingly used as opportunities for surveillance.”

The Ottawa-based Civilian Review and Complaints Commission (CRCC) has previously urged, in the context of National Energy Board hearings on the proposed Northern Gateway pipeline project, that the RCMP “exercise restraint in its surveillance and intelligence-gathering activities concerning events where there is little if any indication that violence or other criminal acts are likely to occur.”

The CRCC also recommended that “the RCMP develop appropriate policies and/or guidance to govern its collection and retention of information, and that the RCMP not retain personal information where it its established that there is no criminal nexus and the events for which it has been collected have concluded.”

Predictive, algorithmic surveillance

The “Pushed into the Shadows” report comments: “The discriminatory potential of AI surveillance tools, including facial recognition and predictive algorithms, are well documented.”

In September 2020, the Ottawa-based International Civil Liberties Monitoring Group (ICLMG) noted its concern that the RCMP had contracted firms, including US-based Babel Street, “that uses algorithms to track, analyze and translate online communications … to engage in widespread online surveillance and so-called ‘proactive’ identification of threats.”

At that time, Cynthia Khoo, a Citizen Lab research fellow and human rights lawyer who recently co-authored a report ‘To Surveil and Protect’ on algorithmic policing, told The Tyee: “Given the track record of Canadian law enforcement using social media surveillance to target civil rights movements and Indigenous and racial justice activists, the RCMP should not be further expanding these kinds of capabilities without wide public consultation and an independent inquiry into this technology’s impact on human rights and historically marginalized groups, such as Black and Indigenous communities.”

The psychological stress of surveillance

The “Pushed into the Shadows” report also highlights: “Surveillance-induced chilling effects assert profound impacts on the individual. These manifest in several, critical, ways, affecting the intimate spheres of life. Beyond economic, cultural and social consequences, they impact people’s ability to function in society and access vital services. The belief of being under surveillance cripples interpersonal trust and social relation ships. Participants highlighted the deep psychological stress arising from mistrust, isolation and fractured social relations affecting ‘every aspect of an activist’s life’.”

This echoes with the “Criminalization, Intimidation and Harassment of Wet’suwet’en Land Defenders” report produced by Amnesty International that documents surveillance by the RCMP of land defenders on their territories in Canada.

This Amnesty International report notes: “Wet’suwet’en land defenders interviewed by Amnesty International shared that the intimidation, harassment, unlawful surveillance and criminalization that they have experienced has negatively impacted their land defence activities. While they used to feel happy and at home on their territory, it is now in some ways associated with feelings of anxiety and stress.”

Bill C-2

In September 2025, Greenpeace Canada expressed their concern that the Canadian government’s Bill C-2, the Strong Borders Act, would “endow the federal government with extraordinary new surveillance powers” and that “the history of RCMP surveillance and repression of land defenders (particularly but not exclusively Indigenous) suggest that these powers will be misused.”

In November 2025, CBC News reported: “Last month, the Liberals made the move to split the bill in hopes of getting some of the border protection-specific measures through Parliament and into law more quickly, with a promise to return to the more contentious issues down the road.”

In their critique of the new Bill C-12, the Canadian Civil Liberties Association (CCLA) notes the findings of a UN committee in their decennial human rights check-up on Canada a concern about “an assault on the right to peaceful protest, including through expanded surveillance of dissenting voices…”

The call for a national inquiry

In March 2026, the Assembly of First Nations (AFN) and the Assembly of Manitoba Chiefs (AMC) called for a national inquiry into the surveillance of Indigenous peoples both historically and with concern about proposed megaprojects.

We continue to follow this issue and will be monitoring the debate on freedom of assembly and digital surveillance at the UN on June 23, 2026.

How a submarine purchase and arms fairs are worsening security risks for Indigenous land defenders and human rights activists

Photo: The police response to the protest organized by the Shut Down CANSEC campaign in Ottawa, May 28, 2026.

As part of our commitment at Peace Brigades International-Canada to the holistic protective accompaniment of human rights defenders, journalists and Indigenous land and environmental defenders, we are researching the links between increasing military budgets, documented attacks against defenders opposing weapons companies and arms fairs, and the implications for land defenders.

The imminent decision on submarines

On July 10, 2024, the Government of Canada announced its intention to acquire up to 12 new submarines for the Royal Canadian Navy.

On October 27, 2025, the Ottawa Citizen further reported: “The Liberal government will spend tens of billions of dollars — with some estimates of up to $100 billion — on a new fleet of submarines.”

More recently, on May 23, 2026, CBC News reported: “Prime Minister Mark Carney’s government is expected to make a decision within weeks [also reported as by late-June 2026] on whether to go with the Hanwha Ocean bid or one by German rival TKMS (ThyssenKrupp Marine Systems).”

It has also been reported by Politico that the decision will be made “within 30 days” from June 13, 2026, meaning by mid-July.

Hanwha and TKMS

The companies bidding for Canada’s submarine contract have been criticized by human rights advocates.

We are now following the work of Abandon Hanwha, an “international campaign pressuring Hanwha to cut ties with Israeli genocide.”

We also recall that the American Friends Service Committee has included TKMS on their list of Companies Profiting from the Gaza Genocide.

Implications for Indigenous land defenders

PBI-Canada has been following the opposition of Gitanyow and Gitxsan land and environmental defenders to the construction of the proposed Prince Rupert Gas Transmission (PRGT) pipeline on their territories in northern British Columbia, Canada. We are also following Wet’suwet’en and Gitxsan opposition to LNG Canada Phase II that would include compressor stations on Wet’suwet’en territory to increase the flow of the Coastal GasLink fracked gas pipeline built without consent.

iPolitics now reports in the context of this submarine purchase: “The Republic of Korea has so far invested $1.6 billion in LNG Canada and will be expanding that to $3.2 billion in the future. The country is also committing to importing 3.4 million tonnes of LNG annually from Canada, more than five times the current amount.”

Dogwood has made this link with the submarine purchase too further highlighting, as CBC News reports, that the German government-owned company Securing Energy for Europe (SEFE) has now signed an agreement to buy one million tonnes of liquefied natural gas per year from Ksi Lisims over an up to 20-year span, while the Duesseldorf-based Uniper has signed a letter of interest to purchase liquefied natural gas from the Ksi Lisims LNG terminal linked to the PRGT fracked gas pipeline.

$4 billion+ in Canadian arms exports in 2025

Along with buying “military goods”, Canada is committed to exporting more weapons, military components and technology.

A recently released report from Global Affairs Canada documents that Canada exported $2.045 billion of “military goods” to non-US markets in 2025.

In March 2026, Project Ploughshares reported that the value of contracts concluded between the Canadian Commercial Corporation and the U.S. Depart of War in fiscal year 2025 totaled $2.07 billion.

Persistent human rights concerns about arms exports

The Global Affairs Canada report on the export of military goods notes: “Saudi Arabia was the largest non-U.S. export destination by value [in 2025], receiving approximately $404 million in Canadian military exports…”

Following a public outcry, Global Affairs Canada conducted a risk assessment that in September 2019 concluded: “Officials found no credible evidence linking Canadian exports of military equipment or other controlled items to any human rights or humanitarian law violations committed by the Saudi government.”

In August 2021, Amnesty International and Project Ploughshares countered with the 50-page report: “NO CREDIBLE EVIDENCE” CANADA’S FLAWED ANALYSIS OF ARMS EXPORTS TO SAUDI ARABIA.

Canada seeks to boost arms exports

The Government of Canada’s “Canada’s Defence Industrial Strategy” (February 2026) has now also pledged to “Substantially increase financial support for export promotion efforts, and add new Trade Commissioners in the UK and key EU markets and ramp up Canada’s presence at major global defence and aerospace trade shows.”

That Strategy promises: “Enhanced support to Canadian firms selling abroad: When it comes to selling Canadian capabilities, the country needs more boots on the ground. This means more Trade Commissioners championing industry’s products, particularly in Europe and the United Kingdom. It means directing Canadian Defence Attachés and other Defence officials to more effectively support trade-promotion initiatives. It means a stronger and more visible Canadian presence at major international defence and aerospace trade shows. Better support for export opportunities also means stronger efforts to receive foreign buyers in Canada.”

Canada at arms fairs, increased attacks against HRDs

The Government of Canada’s pledge to be at arms fairs coincides with the UK-based Business and Human Rights Centre (BHRC) documenting an increase in “attacks” against human rights defenders opposing arms companies and arms fairs.

This past May 2026, the BHRC also documented 46 attacks against human rights defenders (HRDs) in 2025 for “raising concerns about arms and weapons companies and their complicity in conflict and genocide – a significant increase from only two attacks recorded per year in 2023 and in 2024.”

The BHRC further noted: “Protesters at arms fairs targeting companies selling weapons to Israel were detained in the United States, Turkey, Switzerland and France, whilst activists in New Zealand faced violence for protesting the militarisation of aerospace technology and its uses against civilian populations.”

Eurosatory in Paris, June 2026

The Eurosatory arms fair in Paris is taking place in the coming days, June 15-19, 2026.The Canadian Defence and Security Industries (CADSI) is highlighting that there will be a “Canada Pavillon” at Eurosatory.

Stop Arming Israel-France has noted: “From June 12 to 15, 2026, the War on War coalition is calling for a weekend of mobilization against the holding of the Eurosatory exhibition, the global supermarket of war and control.” Their four-days of activities will include: “Monday, June 15 in Villepinte to oppose the opening of the show!”

DX KOREA in 2026 Seoul ADEX in 2027

Additionally, South Korea has at least two upcoming major arms fairs.

DX KOREA is more formally called Defense Expo Korea. The next DX KOREA weapons fair will take place on September 16-19, 2026, at the Korea International Exhibition Center (KINTEX) in Goyang, north-west of Seoul.

The next Seoul ADEX, the Seoul International Aerospace & Defense Exhibition, will take place on October 19–24, 2027, also at KINTEX.

There will be a “Canada Partnership Pavillion” at DX Korea in September 2026 and Canada will likely also be at Seoul ADEX in October 2027.

Protest at DX KOREA 2022

The South Korean daily newspaper The Hankyoreh has reported: “In September 2022, eight peace activists were prosecuted for obstruction of business by climbing onto armored vehicles and tanks displayed at the ‘DX KOREA 2022’ arms exhibition … playing violins and guitars, holding banners warning about the injustices in the arms industry, and shouting slogans ‘Stop profiting from war’.”

“The court sentenced each activist to a fine of 500,000 won [about CAD $460.00] and sentenced the two minors at the time to a one-year suspended sentence.”

After that: “On April 15, 2025, the Supreme Court’s Second Division … stated, ‘Matters related to the national defense industry, such as weapons production and export, have public and social significance and thus constitute matters of public interest,’ and added, ‘Restrictions on freedom of expression on public interest must be made with greater caution than in matters belonging to the private domain’…”

The case was remanded with a not guilty verdict.

Canada at DSEI in Germany and the UK, 2027

There will also be the first ever Defence & Security Equipment International (DSEI) arms show in Hanover, Germany this coming March 9-12, 2027. This has been presented as a “spin-off” of the DSEI arms fair held in London. The next DSEI UK will take place on September 7-10, 2027.

CADSI is planning a “Canada Pavillion” at both DSEI Germany in March 2027 and at DSEI UK in September 2027.

PBI-Canada was present in London, UK to observe the Quaker and wider-community protests against DSEI in September 2025.

CANSEC 2027

PBI-Canada is also following the community organizing related to the annual CANSEC arms show expected to take place on May 26-27, 2027, at the Cohere Centre in Ottawa, Canada.

For updates from the Shut Down CANSEC campaign, click here.

We continue to follow all of this with concern.

Additional reading: “Elbows up? Canada is letting Pentagon take ‘unprecedented’ stakes in Canadian mines: By fast-tracking critical minerals, Canada is not simply building a green economy. It is being further integrated into the U.S. war industry” (by Shiri Pasternak & Nessie Nankivell, The Breach, May 22, 2026).

PBI-Canada notes while the UN has called for strengthening the CORE, the Canadian government has “eliminated” the position

Photo: On September 29, 2025, PBI-Canada and PBI-Mexico accompanied two representatives from Espacio OSC at a meeting in Ottawa with Terrence Cowl, the Deputy Canadian Ombudsperson for Responsible Enterprise (CORE).

CBC News reports: “Prime Minister Mark Carney says his government is eliminating a watchdog position responsible for investigating allegations of human rights violations committed by Canadian companies operating abroad.”

This article adds: “The Canadian Ombudsperson for Responsible Enterprise (CORE) was introduced under former prime minister Justin Trudeau in 2019 to investigate potential abuses, including the use of forced labour. But Carney said on Thursday [June 11] that the role would be ‘eliminated,’ suggesting that the office hadn’t been effective. …Carney said the decision to cut the role was taken ‘a few months ago’ but it doesn’t appear that a government official had yet announced it.”

It further notes: “The CORE had been criticized for lacking the powers to fulfil its mandate. Advocates have said the office needed the ability to compel documents and testimony from companies, for example.”

UN Committee on Human Rights

On March 24, 2026, The Globe and Mail reported: “The United Nations Committee on Human Rights, which includes representatives from the United States, France and Spain, criticized Ottawa for failing to fill the post of a watchdog whose job was to investigate human rights abuses by Canadian companies operating abroad.”

The newspaper noted: “’The Committee recommended that Canada urgently appoint a new Ombudsperson for Responsible Enterprise and ensure the office’s independence and adequate resources,’ the panel said in its report.”

It adds: “The panel [also] called on Canada to ‘strengthen mechanisms to ensure that business enterprises under its jurisdiction respect human rights standards, including when operating abroad.’”

UN Special Rapporteur for human rights defenders

On April 11, 2025, Mary Lawlor, who was at that time the United Nations Special Rapporteur on the situation of human rights defenders, posted on social media: “At #HRC58 [the 58th session of the UN Human Rights Council] I welcomed #Canada’s support for human rights defenders abroad. But I had to say it: Canadian extractive mining companies are putting defenders at risk all over the world. We need binding due diligence obligations, a stronger @CORE_Ombuds [Canadian Ombudsperson for Responsible Enterprise/CORE], and real accountability.”

In November 2024, Lawlor also called for a “significant strengthening of the CORE.”

At that time, Lawlor commented: “I have long-standing concerns as to the adequacy of the CORE, in its current form, to provide any adequate form of redress for human rights defenders and the communities they represent when their rights have been violated or been put at risk by Canadian companies operating abroad. This has been reflected in conversations I have had with human rights defenders since taking up my mandate, who, where aware of the CORE, have repeatedly told me they have no confidence in its effectiveness.”

Specifically, Lawlor called on the Government of Canada to: “Provide the CORE with legally enforceable powers to compel evidence and testimony from companies, in line with international standards and best practice on ombudspersons’ offices, to enable effective investigations of all cases and overcome the barriers presented when companies refuse to meaningfully engage with the CORE.”

Canadian Network for Corporate Accountability

In their response to the elimination of the CORE, the Canadian Network for Corporate Responsibility commented: “In our view, this represents an abandonment of basic human rights principles, leaving communities and workers who allege serious human rights abuse by Canadian companies at significant risk of further harm.”

They further stated: “To our knowledge, this decision was never communicated to the scores of communities and workers who assumed great personal risk to trust the CORE with allegations of human rights abuse linked to Canadian companies, sometimes at the direct encouragement of Canadian government officials. The government’s failure to notify directly-impacted people represents a callous disregard for human life and basic transparency, and is a betrayal of the government’s stated commitment to ‘Canadian values’. We condemn this in the strongest possible terms.”

PBI-Canada monitors attacks against HRDs

Peace Brigades International-Canada continues to document violations by Canadian companies within Canada as well as in the countries where PBI physically accompanies land and environmental defenders, including Colombia, Guatemala, Honduras, Mexico, and now Southeast Asia (the Philippines, Cambodia, Malaysia, Myanmar, and Thailand).

Our initial research in July 2024, utilizing the Business and Human Rights Resource Centre (BHRRC) database, found that 21 Canadian companies have been implicated in 88 attacks against human rights defenders over the past nine years.

We have also expressed concern that Lawlor’s office had registered 15 cases between June 2019 and March 2022 of retaliation against human rights defenders that she alleged can be linked to the activities of Canadian mining companies.

We continue to follow this.