Home Blog Page 177

PBI-Guatemala accompanies CCR water protectors at Court of Peace and in communities with women-led programs

On February 15, PBI-Guatemala posted:

“PBI accompanies the 4 criminalized defenders of the Council of Communities of Retalhuleu (CCR) to the signing of the book in the Court of Peace, Champerico. This coercive measure is part of the judicial process they face for defending the right to water and a dignified life for more than 70 communities in Champerico and Retalhuleu.”

PBI-Guatemala also posted:

“PBI accompanies the Council of Communities of Retalhuleu (CCR) in the framework of visits to the communities of El Rosario and October 20 with the aim of talking about their entrepreneurship programs led by women, as well as concerns regarding territory and access to water.”

PBI-Guatemala has explained: “The Council of Communities of Retalhuleu (CCR) consists of more than 18 communities in the department of Retalhuleu (mainly in the municipality of Champerico). They began to organize in 2015 because of the adverse effects caused by the expansion of the monoculture of sugar and the use of large-scale agrochemicals and pesticides used by the mills in the region.”

In November 2019, Panorama Noticias reported: “Allegations of violations of the right to water, food and environmental pollution by the communities of the South Coast led to four defenders being criminalized by the mills of El Pilar and Magdalena. The Court of First Instance of Retalhuleu terminated a case in which they were accused, however, the case was appealed by sugar mills and the defenders were linked to the process.”

They are charged with illegal detention, coercion and threats. The accusations come from El Pilar and Magdalena, but Magdalena subsequently withdrew from the case.

Abelino Mejía Cancino, a member of the CCR’s Board of Directors and one of those criminalized, has commented that the purpose of this criminalization is to wear people down physically and psychologically, so that they abandon their demands.

Sugar exports to Canada

As seen in the chart below, Canada is one of the largest importers of sugar grown in Guatemala.

Chart by UN Comtrade Database.

In 2016, Simon Fraser University post-graduate student Reuben Jentink wrote: “The sugar is loaded onto ships at the Expogranel sugar loading terminal, responsible for the reception, storage, and loading of all sugar product exported from Guatemala’s Pacific coast at Puerto Quetzal. The sugar then travels 3662 nautical miles to the Rogers [Lantic] Refinery’s deep-sea wharf located at the Port of Metro Vancouver.”

And in 2019, PortsToronto reported that the MV Cape brought more than 18,920 metric tonnes of sugar from Guatemala to Redpath Sugar in Toronto.

CCR water defender Mejia Cancino has commented: “We need people to realize that when they consume sugar, it has an impact on the life of the communities and on the right to water for all. We call for the consumption of what is healthy and good produced by the campesinos and not products made by the big companies.”

PBI webinar with CCR water defender

On March 13, 2022, Mejia Cancino joined a PBI-Canada organized webinar on Defending the right to water from harm by the sugar industry in Guatemala.

The webinar was hosted by Toronto-based PBI-Canada Board member Marianna Tzabiras and also featured Brussels-based Kerstin Reemtsma from PBI-Guatemala.

You can watch the Facebook video of that webinar by clicking here.

Mejia Cancino spoke about the ways in which accompaniment and solidarity can help in the struggle to uphold the right to water:

– “We ask that the international community watch very closely what happens. You can send diplomatic support for the hearings so that they see we do have support.”

– “There is a year-by-year certification process for the sugar mills. They need to visit not just the sugar mills, but the communities, that they come to see the rivers, they need to see the reality of the poverty the sugar cane industry is leaving here in our country.”

– “An international commission needs to come to verify the damage that has taken place. And to say if you aren’t going to protect the environment, we can’t buy your sugar.”

Reemtsma added: “For people listening today, you can ask Canadian companies or the Ministry of Foreign Affairs how they guarantee in the supply chain respect for human rights because as I understand it this commitment does exist.”

The Peace Brigades International-Guatemala began accompanying the Council of Communities of Retalhuleu (CCR) in April 2020.

RCMP maintains presence on Wet’suwet’en territory as Coastal GasLink continues to install its fracked gas pipeline

Photo by Dogwood. 

In early-November 2022, Matt Simmons of the Narwhal reported that Wet’suwet’en Hereditary Chief Na’moks was told by a pipeline security guard: “If you pass this gate, sir, my understanding is that you will be arrested by the RCMP.” He was two kilometres away from where Coastal GasLink is drilling under Wedzin Kwa. 

To hear from Chief Na’moks about this, join our webinar on February 21.

On September 14, 2022, Houston Today reported: “Coastal GasLink has resumed work to run its natural gas pipeline through a tunnel underneath the Morice River.”

The article continues: “The company would not release details other than to say two ‘trenchless watercourse crossings’ are underway underneath the Morice River south of Houston and at Crocker Creek in northeastern B.C.”

By the time of its Monthly Construction Update released on December 26, 2022, Coastal GasLink said that in Section 7, which includes the crossing of Wedzin Kwa, “32.4% of pipe installed, includes activities from stringing through to backfilling.”

And now in the latest Monthly Construction Update released on January 26, 2023, the company says: “40.2% of pipe installed.”

While it has been previously reported that “the active tunneling work is expected to take two and half to three months”, this latest monthly construction update suggests the drilling is not yet complete after five months.

Yesterday, the Prince George Post reported: “The company says it will have a better idea by the summer whether it will need to push construction into 2024. While 84 per cent of construction is complete, there are some remaining challenging areas such as river crossings that can only be undertaken during the winter months, Bevin Wirzba, TC Energy’s  executive vice-president of strategy and corporate development, said [February 14].”

C-IRG on the yintah

Meanwhile, the RCMP has not left Wet’suwet’en territory.

Photo: Kris Statnyk, Na’moks’ legal counsel, asked to talk with the RCMP. Sergeant Jason Charney approached the gate but did not speak (early-November 2022).

This despite the call from the United Nations Committee on the Elimination of Racial Discrimination on December 13, 2019 – now more than 3 years ago – for the RCMP and associated private security to be withdrawn from their traditional lands.

On April 29, 2022, the UN Committee issued its third rebuke calling for the RCMP and notably “the Community-Industry Response Group (C-IRG)” to leave the territory.

Webinar, February 21

Please join us on Tuesday February 21 at 1 pm PT/4 pm ET to hear Wet’suwet’en Hereditary Chief Na’moks provide an update on the RCMP presence on his territory and to hear his comments on the growing calls for the C-IRG to be dismantled.

To register for this, click here.

Webinar speakers: Chief Na’moks, human rights lawyer Shivangi Misra, academic-activist Keith Cherry, moderator Seb Bonet.

Webinar: Dismantle C-IRG, Tuesday February 21

We hope you will be able to join us on Tuesday February 21 at 1 pm PT/4 pm ET for a webinar on the role of the RCMP’s Community-Industry Response Group (C-IRG) in the repression of Indigenous land defence struggles in Canada.

To register for this, please click here.

The C-IRG has been deployed against land defenders opposing the Coastal GasLink fracked gas pipeline on Wet’suwet’en territory, the TransCanada tar sands pipeline on Secwepemc territory, and Teal Jones logging on Pacheedaht and Dididaht territories.

There are questions about its tactics, use of force and exclusion zones, arrests of journalists, relationship with corporations and private security, understanding of Indigenous rights, and budget ($50 million since 2017).

The webinar will highlight the growing movement for the C-IRG to be dismantled.

Speakers:

– Wet’suwet’en Hereditary Chief Na’moks

– Keith Cherry, who has submitted a complaint about the C-IRG to the Civilian Review and Complaints Commission for the RCMP

– Shivangi Misra, Feminist Alliance for International Action (FAFIA) and co-author of ‘The Toxic Culture of the RCMP: Misogyny, Racism, and Violence against Women in Canada’s National Police Force’

– Seb Bonet (PBI-Canada Board member and moderator of this webinar)

To join this discussion, please register here.

Photojournalist Amber Bracken and The Narwhal file lawsuit against the RCMP after arrest on Wet’suwet’en territory in 2021

Video still (at 12:12): Photojournalist Amber Bracken was arrested by the RCMP on November 19, 2021, as she covered the Wet’suwet’en resistance to the Coastal GasLink fracked gas pipeline being built on their territory without consent.

This media release highlights: “The Narwhal and award-winning photojournalist Amber Bracken have filed a lawsuit in British Columbia’s Supreme Court today against the Royal Canadian Mounted Police (RCMP) for the violation of their Charter rights after Bracken was wrongfully arrested and detained while covering the enforcement of an injunction in Wet’suwet’en territory as a journalist in late 2021.”

It adds: “The Narwhal and Bracken are suing for damages related to the RCMP’s arbitrary arrest and detention. The lawsuit is also seeking acknowledgment that The Narwhal and Bracken’s press freedom rights, pursuant to Section 2(b) of the Charter, were breached.”

Bracken has told The Guardian about the experience of her arrest: “A police dog barked and whined as officers broke in the door with an axe and then a chainsaw to arrest the people inside. In that moment, I was both trembling and absolutely rooted in place. I was determined not to let this moment go unreported. I felt kidnapped. I have never been arrested before. And it’s the best word I can think of to describe being taken so abruptly from my life and from my work and in violation of my Charter rights.”

In this Democracy Now! transcript of Bracken’s arrest, she can be heard saying: “For the record, I’m a member of the media. You’ve been notified that I’m here. I’m an observer.”

The Canadian Association of Journalists

Brent Jolly, the president of the Canadian Association of Journalists, says: “I don’t know if it’s blissful ignorance, or just a blatant disregard for the law. But we want to make sure law enforcement understands this is the role of journalists: they’re not there as sort of an inconvenient troublemaker. They’re there to document events and to support the public’s right to know and to bear witness. Despite all the efforts of law enforcement to criminalize journalism over the past several years, journalism isn’t a crime.”

The CBC adds: “RCMP have acknowledged both Bracken and Toledano identified themselves at the scene as independent journalists.”

Peace Brigades International-Canada was in nearby Smithers on November 19, 2021, the day that Bracken was arrested. We were at the court house and the RCMP detachment as land defenders arrested on November 18 had a hearing, were processed and released.

At that time, we posted: CPJ and CAJ call for the release of two Canadian journalists arrested covering Wet’suwet’en land defence struggle.

Webinar on the RCMP C-IRG, February 21

The “community-industry response group” (C-IRG) is the RCMP unit that has been present on Wet’suwet’en territory for three militarized raids against the Wet’suwet’en, including the one in which Bracken was arrested.

On Tuesday February 21, we will be hosting a webinar – highlighting the demand that the C-IRG be abolished – with Wet’suwet’en Hereditary Chief Na’moks, international human rights lawyer Shivangi Misra, and academic Keith Cherry (who has filed a formal complaint against the RCMP through the Civilian Complaints Review Commission for police actions at the Ada’itsx/Fairy Creek blockade). The webinar will be moderated by Seb Bonet of the University of Victoria and member of the PBI-Canada Board of Directors.

To register for this, please click here.

National Defence to spend $6.3 billion on air-to-air missiles for F-35 warplanes

The Canadian government plans to spend more than $6 billion on missiles and bombs for its newly-ordered Lockheed Martin F-35 warplanes.

David Pugliese of the Ottawa Citizen reports: “The $6.3 billion will be for new advanced air-to-air missiles that would cover short, medium and long-ranges, according to National Defence. In addition, some of the money will be earmarked for new still-to-be-determined weapons projects for the stealth fighters. The budget also covers maintenance of the weapons stockpiles.”

Pugliese also notes: “The U.S. and Canada are now in negotiations for a separate delivery of weapons that will be included with the first F-35s. That will involve short and medium-range missiles as well as smart bombs to be used against ground targets.”

Air-to-air missiles and “smart bombs”

AMRAAMS missile

Although the Ottawa Citizen article does not specify, the air-to-air missiles likely include the AIM-120 Advanced Medium-Range Air-to-Air Missiles or AMRAAMs.

The EurAsian Times has reported: “The F-35 can carry four AIM-120 AAMRAMs in its internal carriage, a new generation all-weather weapon manufactured by Raytheon. The AIM-120 is a beyond-visual-range, all-weather air-to-air missile with active radar and an inertial reference unit.”

The US Air Force adds: “Range: 20+ miles (17.38+ nautical miles); Speed: Supersonic; Warhead: Blast fragmentation; Unit Cost: $386,000.”

AIM 9X Sidewinder missile

Raytheon also says the F-35 can carry the AIM 9X Sidewinder short-range air-to-air missile.

GBU-53/B StormBreaker bomb

The “smart bomb” noted in the Ottawa Citizen article likely refers to the GBU-53/B StormBreaker smart bomb produced by Raytheon Technologies.

Defense News explains: “The 204-pound StormBreaker is a relatively small weapon measuring 69 inches long and about 7 inches in diameter. The weapon has a 105-pound warhead. It can strike stationary targets up to 69 miles away and moving targets up to 45 miles away using a combination of millimeter wave active radar homing, semi-active laser guidance, infrared homing, GPS-coupled inertial guidance and data link technology.”

JASSM and LRASM missiles

And Lockheed Martin says: “The F-35 carries weapons internally in stealth configuration, or externally in permissive environments. All variants of the F-35 will carry JASSM or LRASM, providing increased reach, lethality and survivability against heavily-protected, strategic targets and increasing the ability to deter near-peer adversaries.”

Joint Air-to-Surface Standoff Missile (JASSM): “a long-range, conventional, air-to-ground precision standoff missile”

Long Range Anti-Ship Missile (LRASM): “long-range anti-surface cruise missile”

Raytheon describes in more detail the types of bombs and missiles the F-35 can carry here.

Retired Air Force Colonel on the F-35

In this recent webinar organized by World Beyond War, the Canadian Voice of Women for Peace, and the No Fighter Jet Coalition, Paul Maillet highlighted:

“The F-35 is not a peacekeeping aircraft. It is an aircraft that is designed to drop bombs and kill people. If all we wanted to do was control our airspace, you know, somebody shows up in the airspace and be able to go out there and say hello, which is what we did in NORAD a lot and monitor that, the F-35 is not suitable for that. There are very inexpensive ways that we can do that, similar to the way Coast Guards patrol the oceans.”

Maillet has also previously told Defence Minister Anita Anand:

“I am sure you understand that this aircraft has only one purpose and that is to kill or destroy infrastructure. It is, or will be, a nuclear weapon capable, air-to-air and air- to-ground attack aircraft optimized to war fighting. This contributes solely to war.”

We continue to follow this with concern.

Further reading: How much will Canada spend on bombs, missiles and bullets for its new F-35 warplanes? (January 24, 2023)

“The F-35 is an aircraft that is designed to drop bombs and kill people” – Retired Canadian air force colonel Paul Maillet

Paul Maillet is a retired Royal Canadian Air Force Colonel and a former manager of Canada’s fleet of CF-18 fighter jets.

In this recent webinar (starting at 8:32), Maillet highlights:

“The F-35 is not a peacekeeping aircraft. It is an aircraft that is designed to drop bombs and kill people. If all we wanted to do was control our airspace, you know, somebody shows up in the airspace and be able to go out there and say hello, which is what we did in NORAD a lot and monitor that, the F-35 is not suitable for that. There are very inexpensive ways that we can do that, similar to the way Coast Guards patrol the oceans.”

In April 2022, just after Defence Minister Anita Anand announced that negotiations would begin with Lockheed Martin on the purchase of the F-35, Maillet also wrote Anand to say:

“As a former air force colonel and former CF18 engineering fleet manager, I am writing to express my deep disappointment for the recent F35 announcement to select the F35 as the next fighter for the Air Force.

I am sure you understand that this aircraft has only one purpose and that is to kill or destroy infrastructure. It is, or will be, a nuclear weapon capable, air-to-air and air- to-ground attack aircraft optimized to war fighting. This contributes solely to war.

Canadian defence requirements for an aircraft capable of policing Canadian airspace and national sovereignty can be easily met by a far less expensive and less complex aircraft.

The F35 requires a very complex and unaffordable military battle management infrastructure reaching into space, to realize its capabilities, and we will be wholly dependent on US military infrastructure for this. We will be just another squadron or two of the US Air Force and as such dependent on its foreign policy and military predispositions to conflict responses.

The F35 has massively excessive capabilities to our needs. It is like buying a high end Ferrari just to go for groceries.”

And just after Anand announced the decision to purchase the F-35 last month, Maillet wrote her again and stated:

“What you have bought is the most expensive squadron of the USAF in history. It can only be effective as part of a US war.

This aircraft is designed only to kill people and destroy infrastructure. What did we learn from our participation in Libya and Iraq? We have killed civilians, which although we claimed was unintentional, but it was 100% foreseeable.”

#DropTheF35Deal

Maillet has also highlighted that major military contracts do get cancelled.

He says: “It may well be that the deal may die or that the deal is shut down. We have shut down massive programs before. It is not impossible that this deal may suffer some hiccups or be extended way out.”

He cites the example of EH101 helicopter. Prime Minister Jean Chrétien labelled the high performance helicopter a “Cadillac” and cancelled the $3.5 billion contract on taking office in 1993, incurring $478-million in penalties.

Timeline

With respect to this, our understanding is:

-Canada signed a contract in January 2023 with the U.S. Air Force/Lockheed Martin for the purchase of 88 F-35s

-the Parliamentary Budget Officer has requested to receive by February 13 “a copy of the agreement signed with the U.S. government to provide the F-35”

-the first four F-35s are expected to be delivered to the Royal Canadian Air Force in 2026, the next six in 2027, another six in 2028, the first Canadian F-35 squadrons operational in 2029, and all 88 F-35s in place by 2032.

Canada’s air force in 2035 will “look completely different”

On February 13, the Canadian Press reported:

“A model F-35 sits in a place of prominence on the corner of Lt.-Gen. Eric Kenny’s desk. The miniature grey aircraft is propped in the air by a plastic stand as if it is flying, and Royal Canadian Air Force markings are visible on its wings.

“It’s an exciting time,” [Kenny, who is Canada’s air force commander,] said in an interview. “The F-35 is going to not only bring us into being a fifth-generation Air Force, it’s really going to change how the Department of Defence looks at security and data and information, and what we do with that data.”

Between plans to buy armed drones, launch satellites and upgrade North America’s early warning system, the F-35 is just one of several high-tech additions that Kenny suggests will firmly entrench the Air Force in the 21st century over the next decade.

“The Air Force of 2035 is going to look completely different than the Air Force in 2023,” he said. “The amount of projects that are going through right now is similar to what we saw in the late ’70s and early ’80s.””

We continue to follow Canada’s purchase of F-35 warplanes with concern.

The No Fighter Jets Coalition on Parliament Hill on January 7, two days before Defence Minister Anand announced her decision to buy F-35 warplanes.

CCAJAR calls for the elimination of investor-state dispute settlement mechanisms in “free trade” agreements

CCAJAR has signed a statement demanding the elimination of the ISDS mechanism in “free trade” agreements. The call-out for more signatures is here.

Colombia is now facing thirteen investor-state dispute settlement (ISDS) claims in process and eight more in initial stages that total an estimated USD $2 billion. These claims have been brought by transnational corporations from five countries: the United States, Canada, the United Kingdom, Switzerland and Spain.

The PBI-Colombia accompanied José Alvear Restrepo Lawyers’ Collective (CCAJAR) has signed this declaration along with numerous other organizations that is calling on the Colombian government to withdraw from international investment agreements that allow transnational corporations to sue governments with ISDS challenges.

They have also tweeted:

“#TheLatest We launched a petition so that @petrogustavo and @FranceMarquezM withdraw Colombia from #CourtsOfTransnationalAbuse! Sign the request for the Government to withdraw from treaties that allow millionaire lawsuits against the State.”

Specifically, CCAJAR demands of the Colombian government: “Initiate a comprehensive review of the Investment and Free Trade Agreements that contain Investor-State Dispute Settlement, in order to urgently denounce, renegotiate or terminate all existing International Investment Agreements with the aim of eliminating the ISDS mechanism.”

This would include the Canada-Colombia Free Trade Agreement.

The Canadian companies mentioned in this declaration as having sued Colombia through ISDS are the Vancouver-based Eco Oro Minerals Corp. (for USD $696 million in 2016), Toronto-based Galway Gold Inc. (for USD $196 million in 2018), and Vancouver-based Red Eagle Mining (for USD $118 million in 2018).

(In April 2017, the Financial Post also reported: “Canadian miner Gran Colombia Gold [now Aris Mining] has filed a US$700 million lawsuit against Colombia under the Colombian-Canadian free trade agreement after the government ordered the company to cease operations at the El Burro site in Marmato until it has further consulted with local residents.”)

The list could also eventually include Calgary-based Parex Resources Inc.

If fracking is banned in Colombia, as the Gustavo Petro government has pledged to do, Parex Resources Inc. could sue Colombia given it signed an exploration and production (E&P) contract with the National Hydrocarbons Agency (ANH) on September 18, 2014, for Block VMM-9 in the Magdalena Medio region.

Infobae has reported that the government’s intention to ban fracking could be an issue “for the four oil multinationals that signed the contracts with the Colombian State, for the commercial and experimental development of crude oil and gas in unconventional fields in Colombia” including “Parex Resources (with one contract)…”

(That said, Earthworks analyst Patricia Rodríguez has also commented: “In Colombia, the law [to ban fracking] would entail negotiating an end to already signed fracking contracts in order to avoid protracted disputes in international courts.”)

PBI-Colombia has accompanied CCAJAR since 1995.

In August 2002, Canada announced that preliminary talks “on a possible free trade agreement” would begin with Andean countries (including Colombia). By June 2007, that was narrowed down to Colombia and Peru. On June 6, 2008, after five rounds of negotiations, Canada and Colombia concluded negotiations on the agreement.

When Yessika Hoyos Morales of CCAJAR visited Ottawa in May 2009 to speak against the agreement, she told Members of Parliament: “Extrajudicial executions by the national army have grown a lot, achieved through what is called ‘false positives’. The office of the public prosecutor reported that as of September 2009, they had been investigating 2,077 such executions. People were killed by the national army, by people who were supposed to protect them.”

At that time, she stated: “If Canada ratifies the free trade agreement it will give a message to Colombians and to the whole international community that Canada supports a government that violates human rights.”

Despite her pleas, Prime Minister Stephen Harper’s minority Conservative government passed the implementation act for the Canada-Colombia Free Trade Agreement with the support of the opposition Liberals on June 14, 2010.

The call-out for signatures and an initial list of endorsers of the declaration/letter in opposition to the ISDS mechanism, can be read here.

“I never thought taking care of a park would be a dangerous thing” – Belkis Terán

Video: “We are horrified by all that has happened to Manuel. I never thought taking care of a park would be a dangerous thing.” – Belkis Terán speaking about the police killing of her child Manuel in the Weelaunee forest.

CBS News reports: “The family of Manuel Esteban Paez Teran joined attorneys and advocates at a press conference on Monday, February 6, demanding the Georgia Bureau of Investigation release details on its investigation into the officer-involved shooting death of Teran.”

The video of the full press conference can be seen here.

Teran, also known as Tortuguita, was killed by Atlanta police on January 18 while occupying the Weelaunee forest in opposition to Cop City. They were 26 years old.

The article adds: “The family’s attorneys said Teran, who was also known as Tortuguita and went by the pronouns they and them, was shot about 13 times with different guns, based on an independent autopsy.”

The Guardian further explains: “The activist, who went by the name Tortuguita, was one of dozens trying to protect the South River Forest from a $90m (£75m), 85-acre (34-hectare) police and fire department training center planned for the site and, separately, a private developer’s land swap. The project is known as Cop City. Officials said Tortuguita fired at a Georgia state patrol trooper first, wounding the officer.”

Many do not accept this narrative of Manuel firing on the police.

Manuel’s mother Belkis Terán has stated: “He was a pacifist. They say he shot a police officer. I do not believe it.”

David Peisner has also written in The Bitter Southerner that Manuel had said to him: “The right kind of resistance is peaceful, because that’s where we win. We’re not going to beat them at violence. They’re very, very good at violence. We’re not. We win through nonviolence. That’s really the only way we can win. We don’t want more people to die. We don’t want Atlanta to turn into a war zone.”

On February 8, the Atlanta Police Department released video footage of the aftermath of the shooting. Some of that footage can be seen here.

The Intercept reports that in that footage, an Atlanta Police Department officer can be heard saying: “You fucked your own officer up.” He later remarks: “They shoot their own man?” There is also a reference to “suppressed gunfire”, which implies the use of a police weapon.

But the Georgia Bureau of Investigation says: “Speculation is not evidence. Our investigation does not support that statement.”

PBS affiliate GPB adds: “[The Georgia Bureau of Investigation] said its ongoing investigation could take 60 to 90 days to complete.”

More than 1300 climate justice groups have called for an independent investigation.

We continue to follow this with concern.

On the day of the family’s press conference, this video and this video show a massive police operation at the forest. Truthout reports that in December and January, 19 opponents of Cop City were arrested for domestic terrorism, while the arrest warrants show this includes trespassing in the woods, camping or occupying a tree house.

Further reading: Organizations denounce police killing of forest defender Tortuguita in Georgia, USA (January 27, 2023)

PBI-Guatemala accompanies Verapaz Union of Campesino Organizations (UVOC) at Mesoamerican Network Meeting

On February 10, PBI-Guatemala posted:

“#PBI accompanies the Verapacense Union of Campesino Organizations (UVOC) to the Meeting of the Mesoamerican Network of Indigenous Community Radios, Garifunas and Feminists. The meeting brings together people from Mexico, Honduras, Guatemala and Costa Rica, and broadly deals with the situation of rural and campesino communities in the Verapaces region.”

UVOC has also posted on Facebook:

“Meeting of the Mesoamericana Network of Indigenous Community Radios, Garifunas and Feminist. Together with the presence of the countries of Mexico, Honduras, Guatemala, and Costa Rica, during the meeting the topic of the situation of rural communities and peasant families, from the Verapaces region is developed.”

UVOC has 367 affiliated communities (about 50,000 families); 98 per cent of which are Indigenous Maya Q’eqchi’, Poqomchi’ and Achi.”

PBI-Guatemala has been accompanying UVOC since 2005.

#EncuentroRedMesoamerica

PBI-Honduras accompanies the National Union of Rural Workers (CNTC) at National Agrarian Institute as they defend access to land

On February 10, PBI-Honduras tweeted:

“@CntcTegucigalpa [National Union of Rural Workers] in the INA [Instituto Nacional Agrario/National Agrarian Institute] of Comayagua for the review of the status of the file of different campesino bases. We highlight the work of the CNTC in defending access to land, we show concern about the levels of risk they face.”

Land ownership in Honduras in deeply unequal.

Just 5% of large-scale farmers control almost two thirds of all cultivable land, while 71% of small-scale farmers have access to just 5% of it.

The CNTC, founded in 1985, is a small-scale farming and trade union organization that fights for a fairer distribution of land.

In this article, PBI-Honduras notes: “Of the 404 communities that form the CNTC, just 20% have titles to their lands. Many others have worked and lived on their lands for three or four decades and have spent 15 years awaiting the official recognition of their rights that never seems to arrive.”

As a result of this, land evictions are not uncommon.

The Peace Brigades International-Honduras Project has accompanied the National Union of Rural Workers (CNTC) since May 2018.

The CNTC is affiliated with the Unified Confederation of Honduran Workers (CUTH) which in turn is affiliated with the International Trade Union Confederation (ITUC), along with 150+ labour organizations including the Canadian Labour Congress.