Home Blog Page 338

PBI-Canada welcomes the new PBI-Colombia field brigadistas!

PBI-Canada welcomes the field brigadistas who have recently joined the PBI-Colombia Project!

They are Margherita (Italy), Tasos (Greece), Jason (Ireland),  Hannah (Norway), Delia (Chile), Aldana (Argentina), Íñigo (Basque Country) and Ruth (Spain).

We look forward to hearing about your work and reading the articles you produce like this one by the Bogotá Field Team, Social Protest in Colombia: The Hope for a Dignified Life for All.

You can read more about them in their own words in this PBI-Colombia article.

Delia notes: “PBI’s integral protection approach, its mandates, work focuses and principles, which I have come to know, have made me feel useful and absolutely committed to what I intended to do and what I came to do. I’m convinced that this experience implies participating in the purest human richness and will be an exceptional learning experience.”

If you are interested in a similar experience, please note that PBI-Guatemala is seeking new field brigadistas (with a deadline of August 1) as is PBI-Honduras (April 19 is their deadline). More on the opportunity to be a brigadista in Guatemala and Honduras here.

Once again, welcome to Tasos, Ruth, Jason, Hannah, Delia, Margherita, Íñigo and Aldana!

PBI-Guatemala expresses concern about massive police presence in El Triunfo, Retalhuleu

Photo by REDSAG.

On April 15, the Peace Brigades International-Guatemala Project posted: “PBI accompanies 4 criminalized defenders in the region and we are worried about the massive police presence in one of their communities.”

This refers to the four members of the Retalhuleu Community Council (CCR) that has been experiencing criminalization since 2018 for their work denouncing the adverse impacts produced by sugar mills in the region.

The statement of concern from PBI-Guatemala follows a post from REDSAG that says: “In the face of the recent events of repression and intimidation of the El Triunfo community in Champerico, Retalhuleu, we protest.”

REDSAG has also tweeted: “We denounce the repression and intimidation experienced by the El Triunfo community in Champerico, Retalhuleu due to the resistance they have had due to the high charges for electricity. At least 200 riot police are found on the outskirts of the community.”

Prensa Comunitaria further explains: “Since last February, south Coast villagers denounced the suspension of electricity service that affected 18 communities. Some of the villages they have paid for also do not have the service.”

That article adds: “[Energuate] personnel arrived this morning accompanied by dozens of [riot police], in order to remove the poles from the central line that connects electric power to other villages …According to the Community, what the villagers are asking for is the nationalization of electricity, due to the poor service provided by companies such as Energuate.”

And FGER further notes: “This Thursday 15, rioters intimidate the village’s population of El Triunfo.” According to CODECA: “Again foreign company ENERGUATE, along with a riot contingent tries to enter the community, other communities are starting to mobilize themselves to state and business repression.”

The statement below says:

Given the recent events of repression against the El Triunfo Community in Champerico, Retalhuleu

We manifest

That we reject the excessive use of public security forces against indigenous communities to protect the interests of private companies and we publicly denounce the flagrant violation of human rights of women, children, youth and the elderly in the El Triunfo community in Champerico.

State institutions, far from ensuring the collective well-being, put the physical and emotional health of community members at risk by transferring anti-riot elements to communities that suffered the internal armed conflict.

We demand the immediate withdrawal of the public security forces from the El Triunfo community, which instead of guaranteeing respect for human rights, violate communities and Indigenous peoples.

We continue to watch this situation with concern.

Environmental Defence report on Canada’s financial support to oil and gas notes criminalization of Indigenous land defenders

Environmental Defence has just released this report PAYING POLLUTERS: Federal Financial Support to Oil and Gas in 2020.

That report highlights:

“In 2020, the federal government either announced or provided a minimum of nearly $18 billion to the oil and gas sector. This includes $3.28 billion in direct subsidy programs and $13.47 billion in public financing funneled to oil and gas companies primarily through a non-transparent crown corporation, Export Development Canada.”

Notably, it includes the costs of policing/criminalizing land defenders:

“A particularly egregious form of fossil fuel subsidy are investments made into policing Indigenous land defenders opposing fossil fuel infrastructure.

For example, over $13 million was spent last year on the Royal Canadian Mounted Police to ‘protect’ the Coastal GasLink pipeline – which took the form of harassing Wet’suwet’en Nation community members who oppose the pipeline.

Canada has made commitments to reconciliation with Indigenous Peoples and has agreed to uphold the UN Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples (UNDRIP). Criminalizing peaceful land defenders is in contradiction with these commitments.

In January 2020, the UN Committee on the Elimination of Racial Discrimination called upon Canada to halt construction of the Coastal GasLink pipeline until the Wet’suwet’en people grant free, prior and informed consent to the project, and to cease the forced eviction of land defenders.”

And it references human rights concerns:

“EDC’s support to oil and gas includes support for projects that have been criticized for violating human rights at home and abroad, including the right of affected communities to free, prior and informed consent.

For instance, as mentioned above, in 2020 EDC approved a loan of up to $500 million for the Coastal GasLink Pipeline in British Columbia, a project opposed by hereditary leaders from all five clans of the Wet’suwet’en Nation.”

To read the full report by Environmental Defence, please click on PAYING POLLUTERS: Federal Financial Support to Oil and Gas in 2020.

We further note that Environmental Defence acknowledges Karen Hamilton of Above Ground for her input and peer review of this report. To hear Karen speak about the role Export Development Canada has played in supporting Canadian oil and gas operations in Colombia and the environmental and human rights implications of that support, please join this webinar on April 29 at 3:30 pm EDT.

Canada likely to spend another US$70.1 million on the development of the F-35 fighter jet

Last May, the Canadian Press reported: “Canada made the annual F-35 payment to the U.S. military last week, spending US$70.1 million to remain one of nine partner countries in the fighter-jet project.”

It highlights: “Each partner is required to cover a portion of the plane’s multibillion-dollar development costs to stay at the table.”

Last year’s payment brought Canada’s total spending on the development of the F-35 warplane to US$541.3 million.

Money well spent?

The Canadian Press article notes: “Staying in the program has advantages, as partners get a discount when purchasing the jets and compete for billions of dollars in contracts associated with building and maintaining them.”

The government, according to the article, says Canadian companies have secured US$1.8 billion in work related to the stealth fighter.

But research shows that spending on the military generates less for the economy than other expenditures of public funds.

Research by the Costs of War Project based at Brown University’s Watson Institute for International and Public Affairs found that while $1 million spent on “defence” creates 6.9 direct and indirect jobs, the same amount invested in solar power creates 9.5 jobs, in health care 14.3 jobs, and in elementary and secondary education 19.2 jobs.

Technical and operational concerns with the F-35

Forbes also recently reported: “With a sticker price of around $100 million per plane, including the engine, the F-35 is expensive. While stealthy and brimming with high-tech sensors, it’s also maintenance-intensive, buggy and unreliable.”

It then quotes Air Force Chief of Staff Gen. Charles Brown Jr. who compares the F-35 to a Ferrari and says: “You don’t drive your Ferrari to work every day, you only drive it on Sundays. This is our ‘high end’ [fighter], we want to make sure we don’t use it all for the low-end fight. I want to moderate how much we’re using those aircraft.”

That article concludes: “Brown’s comments are a tacit admission that the F-35 has failed.”

Fighter jet decision coming soon; $76.8 billion price tag

The Government of Canada’s timeline for the purchase of new fighter jets notes that “the initial evaluation of proposals is anticipated to be completed by spring 2021” and further promises to award the contract in 2022.

This would suggest that as long as a decision remains pending, the Canadian government will continue to make the annual payment on the development of the F-35.

The cost of purchasing new fighter jets has been pegged at $15-19 billion, but significantly a recent report by the No Fighter Jets coalition estimated the life-cycle costs of 88 fighter jets to be $76.8 billion (including these development costs).

PBI-Canada highlights the concerns of three Colombian human rights groups about port expansion in Buenaventura

Photo: In February, PBI-Colombia accompanied the Inter-Church Commission on Justice and Peace as concerns were expressed about the bodies that have been dumped by armed groups into the waters around Buenaventura.

Global Affairs Canada produces an annual report on human rights relating to the Canada-Colombia Free Trade Agreement.

This Annual Report has been criticized by Canadian civil society for several reasons, including it excludes investment and focuses in a limited way on the human rights impacts of tariff reductions.

Those tariff reductions have resulted in merchandise trade increasing by approximately 30 percent overall since 2010. Some of that would transit through the port in Buenaventura given it accounts for about 60 per cent of all Colombian imports and exports by sea.

Aware of the limitations of the annual report, PBI-Canada has submitted concerns articulated by three PBI-Colombia accompanied organizations that connect the expansion of the port in Buenaventura with human rights violations.

That brief highlighted:

The Association for Research and Social Action (NOMADESC) has pursued research to show how the port and infrastructure development are linked to human rights violations and the infringement of constitutional and ethno-territorial rights.

The Inter-Church Commission on Justice and Peace has also produced a report that notes this concern as well and highlights “the magnitude of the international trade agreements that frame the claim to expand the Colombian market abroad … makes it essential that the State participate as a guarantor of the rights of the population at risk.”

And the Nydia Erika Bautista Foundation for Human Rights (FNEB) has opposed expansion of the port because it destroys areas where they report graves.

Yesterday, El Tiempo reported that the Special Jurisdiction for Peace (JEP) tribunal had agreed to study a request from 16 organizations, including the Inter-Church Commission for Justice and Peace and the Nydia Erika Bautista Foundation for Human Rights, to order the protection of the wetlands in the south of the city so that residents would have the right to search for their missing relatives.

The Global Affairs annual report on the free trade agreement will be tabled on May 27.

Observatory posts Urgent Intervention expressing concern about death threats against CREDHOS, FEDEPESAN and Aguawil

The Observatory for the Protection of Human Rights Defenders has posted this URGENT INTERVENTION (in Spanish) on the following situation in Colombia.

The Observatory notes that it has received with deep concern information on death threats against membership of the Regional Corporation for the Defense of Human Rights (CREDHOS) and two of the organizations it accompanies, the Federation of Artisan, Environmental and Tourism Fishermen of Santander (FEDEPESAN) and the Committee for the Defense of Water, Life and territory of Puerto Wilches (Aguawil).

The Observatory highlights:

CREDHOS: On 24 March 2021, the CREDHOS office in Barrancabermeja, Santander department, received a phone call in which an unknown person threatened to kill all members of the organization, ordering them to “stop making publications and be toads, all CREDHOS is a military target, has 48 hours to leave Barranca.”

Aguawil: On January 29, 2021, in the evening hours, two unknown men broke into the home of Yuvelis Natalia Morales, a member of Aguawil, in Puerto Wilches, and threatened her with death warning her to “stop fucking” because they “could kill her any day.”

FEDEPESAN: On January 20, 2021, unknown persons attacked Yuli Andrea Velázquez, president of FEDEPESAN, and her family with guns while in their home in llanito de Barrancabermeja.

The Observatory asks that emails be sent to Colombian authorities urging them to, among other actions, “Ensure the safety and physical and psychological integrity of the membership of CREDHOS, FEDEPESAN and Aguawil, including through the implementation of immediate and effective protection measures by the National Protection Unit (UNP).”

To read the full URGENT INTERVENTION, please click here.

The Observatory is a joint program of the World Organization Against Torture (OMCT) and the International Federation for Human Right (FIDH).

Webinar on April 29 with threatened defenders

And you can click here to register for a bilingual (in Spanish and English) webinar to hear directly from three of the human rights defenders named in the URGENT INTERVENTION – Ivan Madero (CREDHOS president), Yuvelis Natalia Morales (Aguawil) and Yuli Andrea Velázquez (FEDEPESAN) – speak on this situation.

Ramsey Clark, a member of PBI’s first Central America project committee, dies at 93

Ramsey Clark in 1990. Photo by Mark Pesetsky/AP.

Ramsey Clark, who was a member of PBI’s first Central America project committee in 1982, has passed away at 93 years of age.

As the Assistant Attorney General, Clark supervised the drafted of the Voting Rights Act of 1965. Later, as the Attorney General he supported the Civil Rights Act of 1968.

After he left public office, he supported many antiwar causes.

The Guardian reports: “In the court of public opinion, he charged the US with militarism and arrogance, starting with the Vietnam war and continuing with Grenada, Libya, Panama and the Gulf war.”

“When Clark visited Iraq after Operation Desert Storm and returned to accuse the US of war crimes, Newsweek dubbed him the Jane Fonda of the Gulf war.”

That article adds: “Clark’s client list included such peace and disarmament activists as the Harrisburg seven and the Plowshares eight.”

Gloria La Riva has also recounted: “Whether it was defying U.S. bombs in North Vietnam in 1972 or counting the bodies in Panama morgues and the bombed-out neighborhood of El Chorrillo to tally the true number of casualties in the 1989 U.S. invasion, Ramsey risked his life countless times to bring back the truth of U.S. aggression.”

“He famously traveled 2,000 miles through Iraq in the midst of intense bombing during the 1991 U.S. Gulf War to bring back the only uncensored film of the war. And for 12 years until the 2003 U.S. war and occupation, Ramsey led an international campaign against the U.S. total blockade of Iraq — sanctions more deadly than a bombing war.”

She adds: “On Jan. 1, 1994, when the Zapatista rebellion rose up in Chiapas, Mexico, Ramsey, true to form, knew he had to be there to investigate and show his support.”

PBI’s earliest work in Central America included a short presence in Jalapa, Nicaragua in September 1983, with a PBI team interposing themselves between US-backed Contras and Sandinista military forces.

That early work also included the formation of PBI-Guatemala in 1983 at a time of intense state repression and the accompaniment of threatened organizations in El Salvador starting in 1987.

PBI-Canada acknowledges Ramsey Clark’s contributions to PBI and his commitment to peace and social justice.

Migrant rights defenders concerned by new agreements that further militarize the borders of Mexico, Guatemala and Honduras

Mexican soldiers in Chiapas near the border with Guatemala. Photo by Isaac Guzman/Agence France Presse.

On April 12, Common Dreams reported: “Human rights defenders expressed concern Monday after the Biden administration announced it reached agreements with Mexico, Honduras, and Guatemala for those countries to boost their deployments of military forces to stop the flow migrants trying to make their way to the United States.”

That article highlights that White House press secretary Jen Psaki said that under the agreements Mexico will keep 10,000 troops at its southern border, Guatemala will have 1,500 police and military personnel on their border with Honduras, and Honduras will have 7,000 police and military to disperse large contingents of migrants.

And it quotes Erika Guevara-Rosas, the Americas director at Amnesty International, who accused US President Joe Biden of “repeating the mistakes of past administrations by securing agreements with Mexico, Guatemala, and Honduras to further militarize their borders in a bid to stop people who are fleeing from state repression, violent crime, food insecurity, and the devastating effects of the climate crisis.”

The militarization of these borders is not new.

This report co-authored by the National Human Rights Network All Rights for All (Red TDT) in September 2019 highlighted:

“The current regional trend towards the militarisation of borders to contain and reduce migration has increased the risk of a wide range of human rights violations for migrants and refugees. PRAMI and Red TDT as well as many other NGOs in the region have long documented how in countries such as Mexico, Guatemala, Nicaragua, and Honduras, the deployment of military forces to address civilian issues increases instances of forced disappearance, torture and extrajudicial killings.”

That report adds: “The militarisation of borders and migrant routes does not reduce the flow of people in transit through Central America and Mexico seeking to reach the United States. Rather, it diversifies the flow and makes it more complex, resulting in negative implications for nearly all actors but especially for the migrant population and their allies.”

The American Friends Service Committee has also previously commented: “Over the past four decades, policies under every presidential administration – regardless of political party – have systematically militarized southern border communities, criminalizing millions of immigrants and creating repressive conditions from California to Texas.”

In this recent interview with The Guardian, Vancouver-based migrant rights activist Harsha Walia commented: “There’s been a lot of emphasis on the ways in which Donald Trump was enacting very exclusionary immigration policies. But border securitization and border controls have been bipartisan practices in the United States. We saw the first policies of militarization at the border with Mexico under Bill Clinton in the late 90s.”

She further notes: “What we need to understand is that migration is a form of reparations. Migration is an accounting for global violence.”

And she cautions: “More and more people are being forced out of their land because of trade agreements, mining extraction, deforestation, climate change.”

The Peace Brigades International-Mexico Project works closely with Red TDT and the Saltillo Migrant Shelter near the border between Mexico and Texas. The Shelter provides clothes, medicine, food, rest and care to hundreds of migrants transiting through Mexico to reach the United States. Because of their migrant justice work and the militarization of the border, Shelter staff have suffered harassment, surveillance and threats.

Video: Saltillo Migrant Shelter director Alberto Xicotencátl Carrasco turns away the police attempting an illegal immigration check at the shelter in July 2019.

PBI-Mexico accompanies the OFPC as coal extraction intensifies in the state of Coahuila

PBI-Mexico with OFPC director Cristina Auerbach.

The Associated Press reports Mexico’s state-owned electrical power company intends to buy 2 million metric tons of coal from Mexican producers between July and December of this year to burn in power plants.

The Los Angeles Times further reports: “[President Andrés Manuel] López Obrador’s devotion to fossil fuels at a time when most nations are moving in the opposite direction has dismayed environmentalists, who warn that Mexico will be unable to meet its emission reduction commitments under the Paris climate agreement.”

Earlier this year, The Guardian also reported: “López Obrador has shown a marked enthusiasm for coal, which produces roughly 9.5% of Mexico’s electricity. In October [2020], he travelled to the coal mining regions of Coahuila, to announce the reactivation of CFE [Federal Electricity Commission] coal-fired plants.”

PBI-Mexico accompanies the Organization Familia Pasta de Conchos (OFPC) in Coahuila.

The organization was formed in 2006 to advocate for the recovery of the bodies of 65 miners who died in the Pasta de Conchos Mine in San Juan Sabinas, Coahuila.

PBI-Mexico has explained: “Gradually the organization began to bring attention to the more global phenomenon of the precarious labour conditions that miners in the region face, particularly the safety risks they face in their work.”

This includes inspecting risky labour conditions in mines, documenting labour accidents, and providing legal assistance to miners in the region.

The OFPC has also advocated for families who have seen their health and land affected by coal mining, notably in the village of Cloete.

Auerbach has highlighted: “Our life is worth more than coal.”

The Guardian comments: “In the past, Mexico has been a climate leader. It was the first developing country to deliver its climate action plan ahead of the Paris agreement, but such ambitions are now treated with crushing lack of interest by the government.”

Vote against rare earth mine in Greenland could have implications for F-35 fighter jets

A Danish F-35 fighter jet.

The EU Observer reports: “Late Tuesday (6 April) evening, expectant Greenlanders received the election results for Inatsisartut, Greenland’s parliament. The left-wing Inuit Ataqatigiit (IA) celebrated as it became clear they had gained a clear majority.”

Significantly, that article adds: “According to the US Geological Survey, Greenland has the world’s largest undeveloped deposit of rare-earth minerals.”

The Courthouse News Service further explains: “Rare earth elements are a set of 17 soft heavy metals, such as neodymium and scandium, that go into the making of smartphones, lasers, electric cars, wind turbines and military hardware such as the F-35 fighter jet.”

The Australian mining company Greenland Minerals and Energy acquired the Kvanefjeld (or Kuannersuit) site in southern Greenland in 2007 and applied in 2015 to establish a large-scale open-pit rare earth mineral mine there.

The mine gained preliminary approval in 2020 paving the way for a public hearing.

But the article notes: “By backing the opposition Inuit Ataqatigiit, the mine seems doomed. The left-green Inuit Ataqatigiit campaigned against it and backs a moratorium on uranium mining. It also has pledged to join the Paris climate agreement, a move that could preclude Greenland from developing rare earth mines.”

The Associated Press also notes: “The opposition party has claimed that a majority of Greenland’s 56,000 inhabitants, most of them indigenous Inuit people, are against the project, largely for environmental reasons.”

Rare earth mines and F-35s

The Financial Times has reported: “Fighter jets such as the F-35, a Lockheed Martin aircraft, rely heavily on rare earths for critical components such as electrical power systems and magnets. A Congressional Research Service report said that each F-35 required 417kg [920 pounds] of rare-earth materials.”

Air Force Magazine has also reported: “Each stealthy F-35 strike fighter requires 920 pounds of rare-earth material, according to DOD [Department of Defense].”

Greenland is an autonomous territory within the Kingdom of Denmark.

Lockheed Martin has noted: “Denmark joined the F-35 Joint Strike Fighter program in 2002. In June 2016, Denmark confirmed plans to procure 27 F-35As.”

That page adds: “2020: First F-35A for Denmark progressing towards delivery.” A first F-35 may have been delivered to Denmark earlier this month.

The Canadian government is currently considering buying 88 Lockheed Martin F-35 fighter jets for $19 billion. A decision on that is expected later this year or in early 2022.