Home Blog Page 432

PBI-Canada watches with great concern the expected RCMP action on Wet’suwet’en territory today

The Indigenous Unist’ot’en land defence camp on unceded Wet’suwet’en territory in British Columbia has now stated that it expects a “militarized invasion of our territories” by the Royal Canadian Mounted Police (RCMP) today (Wednesday February 5).

The Unist’ot’en add, “Busloads of police have taken over local community halls, airport hangers have become RCMP training grounds, while armored pickup trucks and police dogs have been spotted in the area. Canada is preparing to use militarized force to steal our lands and destroy them, with the world as witness.”

And Michael Toledano has tweeted, “RCMP taking over community centers to stage militarized raid. A mobile command unit is parked out front.”

This RCMP mobilization happened during discussions between the company Coastal GasLink, that wants to build a fracked gas pipeline on Wet’suwet’en territory, and the Wet’suwet’en Hereditary Chiefs, the legal governance body of this territory.

The Wet’suwet’en Nation has not given its free, prior and informed consent to the construction of this pipeline on their traditional lands.

The Wet’suwet’en Hereditary Chiefs have stated in this media release dated yesterday, “Coastal Gaslink declined to see this discussion resulting in progress. Therefore, the enforcement of the injunction zone is imminent.”

That injunction was issued by a lower court in British Columbia even though the Supreme Court of Canada has confirmed that the Wet’suwet’en never surrendered title to their ancestral lands and accepted extensive evidence outlining their hereditary governance system.

The Unist’ot’en Camp states, “We are peaceful people and we have every right to protect the land that defines and sustains us.”

“We continue to honour our ancient laws, shaped over millennia to ensure a sustainable relationship with the land; while BC and Canada fail to honour their recent commitments to reconciliation and to implement the United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous People.”

The Unist’ot’en Camp adds, “We are protecting our right to exist as Indigenous people, while protecting the land and water for everyone’s future generations.”

At this time, Peace Brigades International-Canada recalls statements of concern made by the British Columbia Civil Liberties Association, British Columbia’s Human Rights Commissioner, dozens of academics and lawyers from across Canada, and the United Nations Committee on the Elimination of Racial Discrimination.

The UN Committee called on Canada to guarantee that no force would be used against the Wet’suwet’en peoples and asked that the RCMP and associated security and policing services be withdrawn from their traditional lands.

Last year, heavily armed RCMP officers raided the Gidimt’en checkpoint. The Guardian has reported, “Canadian police were prepared to shoot Indigenous land defenders blockading construction of a natural gas pipeline… The RCMP commanders also instructed officers to ‘use as much violence toward the gate as you want’…”

This potential for violence against Indigenous land defenders in the current context is of the deepest concern to us.

For updates on this situation today, please see the Twitter accounts of the Unist’ot’en Camp and the Gidimt’en Checkpoint.

PBI-Mexico accompanied Félix Zurita for documentary film on Indigenous opposition to Puebla 1 hydroelectric dam

On February 4, the Peace Brigades International-Mexico Project posted this article on its website that highlights, “In February of last year, PBI-Mexico accompanied, in the Sierra Norte de Puebla, Félix Zurita, a Spanish documentary filmmaker, to record some images about the situation of defenders of their land, territory and the environment of the communities of San Mateo Tlacotepec, Altica and San Felipe Tepatlán.”

PBI-Mexico explains, “For more than a decade, in the Sierra Norte de Puebla, Totonac communities have fought for the survival of their traditions and the defense of their territory.” That struggle has included opposition to the construction on the Puebla 1 hydroelectric plant on the Ajajalpan River that began in February 2016.

“In January of this year, the communities won an important judicial battle against the construction of the dam project, when the local City Council revoked the construction permits for the Puebla 1 work due to serious illegalities in administrative processes.”

The footage by Félix Zurita can be seen in this 14-minute video titled ‘Los Hijxs del Agua’ (Children of the Water).

Zurita has also made a new documentary titled ‘La Sangre de la Tierra’ (The Blood of the Earth) that tells the story of three processes of resistance to hydroelectric dams in Mexico (Puebla 1), Guatemala (Renace and Oxec) and Honduras (Los Planes).

The trailer for that film can now be seen online here. You can also read more about the film on the Fundacion Luciernaga website.

PBI-Mexico adds, “The defenders who are part of these resistance movements have been attacked, threatened and criminalized for their active resistance against the imposition of economic projects in their territories. PBI is witnessing the worrying increase in these types of attacks against defenders in the region.”

The full PBI-Mexico article can be read here.

Please contact Peace Brigades International-Canada via brent@pbicanada.org if you are interested in co-organizing a community screening of ‘La Sangre de la Tierra’ (with English subtitles) in this country.

PBI-Mexico accompanies Codigo DH at 8th anniversary of the stopping of a wind power mega-project in San Dionisio del Mar

The Peace Brigades International-Mexico Project has posted, “On January 29th we accompanied Codigo DH in their participation in the celebration of the 8th anniversary of the Assembly of San Dionisio del Mar.”

San Dionisio del Mar is located in the state of Oaxaca in south-western Mexico. It is situated in the Isthmus of Tehuantepec region.

PBI-Mexico adds, “This Assembly was created in 2012 in response to the presence in its territory of foreign wind [a consortium that included the Australian investment bank Macquarie, the Japanese company Mitsubishi and the Dutch pension fund PGGM]. The Anniversary celebrates the achievements defending the earth so far.”

In April 2014, New Internationalist reported, “For the past two years, members of the small town San Dionisio del Mar … have campaigned against the construction of a wind farm on more than 600 hectares of communally owned land.”

“They have demanded the cancellation of land permits issued by the local council in 2004 [that lacked free, prior and informed consent].”

“The Ikoots, or Huave, are a fishing society. The proposed wind farm would include the installation of more than 100 wind turbines on a thin spit of land in San Dionisio del Mar, which locals fear would disrupt the aquatic life they rely on for their livelihoods.”

New Internationalist also noted, “Heavy trucks used in the construction of the wind parks have already caused damage to local highways. There are also concerns that the turbines would disturb bird migration patterns.”

This Clean Energy Wire article adds, “In the months that followed, even women and teenagers defended barricades to stop the police forces sent to clear the area for the construction of the wind park.”

The Mexico Daily News adds that the Mareña Renovables wind power project (whose chief customer was to be Coca-Cola bottler Femsa) was cancelled in early 2014.

The PBI-Mexico briefing paper Wind Farms and Concerns about Human Rights Violations in Oaxaca has highlighted that:

“Throughout 2013, PBI observed with concern an increase in the level of violence in the context of wind farms, particularly against [human rights defenders] and community leaders whose work involves the defence of those affected by these developments.”

That paper adds, “PBI believes that [human rights defenders] are essential actors in promoting environmental and social justice, highlighting the importance of respecting human rights norms in the context of large scale economic projects.”

You can read more in the Codigo DH article San Dionisio de Mar commemorates eight years of struggle against extractive projects.

PBI-Mexico has accompanied Codigo DH since its creation in 2011.

PBI-Guatemala develops four popular education infographics on free, prior and informed consent

The Peace Brigades International-Guatemala Project has posted four popular education infographics on the right to free, prior and informed consent.

The first infographic is posted above, the other three are included at the bottom of this article.

The United Nations has explained, “Free, Prior and Informed Consent (FPIC) is a specific right that pertains to indigenous peoples and is recognised in the United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples (UNDRIP).”

The UN further notes:

Free: consent given voluntarily and without coercion, intimidation or manipulation. A process that is self-directed by the community from whom consent is being sought, unencumbered by coercion, expectations or timelines that are externally imposed.

Prior: consent is sought sufficiently in advance of any authorization or commencement of activities.

Informed: nature of the engagement and type of information that should be provided prior to seeking consent and also as part of the ongoing consent process.

Consent: collective decision made by the right holders and reached through a customary decision-making processes of the communities.

In 2018, PBI-Guatemala commented, “The right to territory and the management of natural resources, particularly in the case of indigenous peoples, continued to be one of the main causes of conflict in the country during the year.”

Peace Brigades International accompanies 10 organizations in Guatemala with 10 international volunteers based in Guatemala City.

Colombia publishes draft rules for fracking pilot projects, human rights defenders continue to seek a prohibition

On February 3, Business News Americas reported, “Colombia has published modified draft rules for fracking pilots as the government seeks to overcome opposition to unconventional oil and gas drilling.”

“The 19-page document outlining proposed guidelines for ‘pilot projects of integral research’ is available for public comment until February 15.”

The draft rules for fracking pilot project can be read in Spanish here.

The article adds, “Colombia’s first fracking pilots are expected to begin in the second half of this year after the country’s highest administrative court – the Council of State – excluded the projects from a moratorium on unconventional drilling.”

“BNamericas understands that the pilots – all located in northern Colombia – will be operated by ExxonMobil (Puerto Wilches, Santander department), Ecopetrol (Barrancabermeja, Santander), ConocoPhillips (San Martín, Cesar) and Drummond (Ranchería, Cesar).”

Canadian companies and fracking in Colombia

This article does not mention Calgary-based Parex Resources Inc. On March 8, 2019, Reuters had reported that “at least five companies are interested in six fracking blocs in Colombia…” In that article, Colombian Mines and Energy Minister Maria Fernanda Suarez names Parex as one of the companies interested in the fracking blocs.

It’s also unclear if Houston, Texas-based ConocoPhillips will partner, as it has in the past, with Bogota-based CNE Oil and Gas, a subsidiary of Calgary-based Canacol Energy Ltd. As Reuters has reported, the two transnationals had previously sought to frack the VMM-3 block in northern Cesar province.

Beyond the pilot projects, Toronto-based Frontera Energy Corporation is a minority owner of a pipeline that runs through the Magdalena Medio region. Reuters has reported that pipeline could “move increased crude output from the center of Colombia to the Caribbean” if fracking is approved beyond the pilot projects.

In his recent report on Colombia, the United Nations Special Rapporteur on the situation of human rights defenders expressed concern (in points 29 and 30 on page 9) about Frontera Energy Corp. in relation to the arrest of eight environmental activists in San Luis de Palenque, the company’s “failure” to “fulfil its obligation to compensate communities affected by environmental damage and to repair damaged roads”, as well as “the apparent connection between Frontera Energy, the army’s 16th brigade and the Attorney General’s Support Office in this criminalization and the possible impact of the agreement between Ecopetrol S.A. and the Attorney General’s Office on the situation.”

PBI accompaniment

The Peace Brigades International-Colombia Project accompanies the women’s legal collective CCALCP and the human rights organization CREDHOS. PBI-Canada helped host a visit by representatives of those organizations in November 2019. Both CCALCP and CREDHOS highlighted their concerns about the impact of fracking on human rights.

Furthermore, PBI-Colombia also accompanies the Committee in Solidarity with Political Prisoners (CSPP) and the Social Corporation for Community Advisory and Training Services (COSPACC), who are following closely the situation with Frontera Energy and the arrest of human rights defenders in San Luis de Palenque.

PBI-Colombia has accompanied CREDHOS since 1994, CSPP since 1998, CCALCP since 2006, and COSPACC since 2009.

PBI-Guatemala interviews Indigenous land defender Bernardo Caal Xol on the 2-year anniversary of his imprisonment

The Peace Brigades International-Guatemala Project has posted, “On January 30, 2020, Q’eqchi’ leader Bernardo Caal Xol served two years in prison. In this video he comments about his situation and the right to consultation.”

That 4-minute video (in Spanish) can be seen here.

Tz’ikin reports, “The Community Assembly for the Defense of the Cahabón River and the immediate Freedom of Bernardo Caal Xol took place in the municipality of Santa María Cahabón in the morning hours of Saturday, February 1.”

“Around two hundred people from the communities that make up the Peaceful Resistance for the Defense of the Cahabón River were present to express their rejection of the hydroelectric projects that still continue in the area that ancestorically belongs to the Mayan people q’eqchi ‘of Chi k’ajb ‘om.”

That article highlights, “During the Assembly, an emotional letter was read that Bernardo Caal wrote from the prison in Cobán where he has already been 2 years of unjust prison, where among other things he mentions:

‘In these two years of prison torture, I thank with all my heart the accompaniment and solidarity of the national and international community. They have not abandoned me and they have denounced the criminalization towards the Q’eqchi ‘People and against me.’”

Land Rights Now adds, “The Cahabón River plays a spiritual role in the life of 195 Q’eqchies communities in the municipality of Santa María de Cahabón, in the department of Alta Verapáz.”

“Currently this river is exploited by seven hydroelectric projects that have left the destruction of primary forests and hills that are sacred to the inhabitants. As if that were not enough, the communities that today fight for the river, currently do not enjoy the benefits of electricity and are increasingly affected their access to water.”

PBI-Guatemala has accompanied the Peaceful Resistance of Cahabón since July 2017.

PBI-Colombia accompanies human rights defenders at Verification Commission session in the village of Puerto Nuevo Ité

On February 3, CREDHOS posted, “CREDHOS accompanied the peasant communities of the Northeast Antioquia, to gather information on super reports of Human Rights Violations and Violations of International Humanitarian Law.”

CAHUCOPANA also posted, “Within the framework of the program: Route for the protection of human rights defenders of the Colombian Northeast, integrated by the Humanitarian Action Corporation for Coexistence and Peace of the Northeast Antioquia (Cahucopana), the Campesino Association of the Cimitarra River Valley (ACVC), the Association of Agro-Ecological and Mining Brotherhoods of Guamocó (Aheramigua) and the Campesino Association of Catatumbo (Ascamcat), the first Verification Commission to the Northeast Antioquia was held today [February 1].”

The UN Verification Commission in Colombia notes that its role is to “verify the reintegration of former FARC-EP members into political, economic and social life and the security guarantees for former FARC-EP members, their families and communities in the territories.”

The CAHUCOPANA post adds, “This action was aimed at: Corroborating information reported in previous days of the situation of violation of human rights and the violation of International Humanitarian Law, by armed actors who are present in the village of Puerto Nuevo Ité, jurisdiction of the municipality of Remedios and that put life at risk and integrity of the civilian population.”

That post also notes, “In this Commission, it was attended by members of the Community Action Board of the village, delegates of Cahucopana, ACVC, of ​​the Regional Association of Victims of State Crimes in the Magdalena Medio (Asorvimm), of the Regional Corporation for the Defense of Human Rights (Credhos) and the accompaniment of Peace Brigades International (PBI), Christian Peacemaker Teams (CPT/ECAP) and International Action For Peace.”

Additional photos can be found on Twitter from CAHUCOPANA and IAP Action Peace.

The Peace Brigades International-Colombia Project has accompanied CREDHOS since 1994, ACVC since 2007, and CAHUCOPANA since 2013.

PBI-Kenya provides training sessions to the Network of Mothers of Victims and Survivors of extra judicial killings

On February 3, Peace Brigades International-Kenya Project posted, “The Network of Mothers of Victims and Survivors of extra judicial killings is a movement anchored at Mathare Social Justice Centre which brings together men and women whose children were felled by police bullets, survivors of torture and victims of enforced disappearance.”

“Between January 21-24 PBI provided members of the Network – from Mathare, Dandora, Mukuru, Kayole and Kiambiu – with sessions on monitoring, documentation and human rights and a psychological debrief to reflect and share their trauma with each other. The debriefing sessions are intended to enhance the participants’ coping mechanisms and abilities in managing personal stresses. The trainings are meant to build the capacities of the network as they pursue justice for their families and others.”

PBI-Kenya adds, “We hope that those who participated are as inspired as we are by their resolve, compassion, and drive. Together we are united, and united we fight for justice.”

The PBI Annual Review notes that in 2018, “Four international volunteers accompanied members of two grassroots organisations and twenty-nine human rights defenders working in the Nairobi’s urban settlements and the Mount Kenya region.”

PBI has provided the context: “People in Nairobi’s informal settlements face serious inequities in basic services ranging from water and sanitation to the state’s justice system, which threatens their very right to life.”

“Extrajudicial executions are frequently carried out in these areas by murderous police officers, whose collaboration with the regular police units and with the operational and support structures remains a mystery.”

“Such experiences do not occur in Nairobi’s affluent neighborhoods, highlighting the scorn and widespread criminalization of the urban poor.”

In April 2018, PBI-Kenya together with the Mathare Social Justice Centre, the Ghetto Foundation and Saferworld began a two-year project titled Ushirikiano Mwema kwa Usalama (Good relationships for safety) to tackle the normalization of extrajudicial killings in the Nairobi constituencies of Mathare, Kamukunji and Embakasi North.

PBI established the Kenya Project in December 2012.

Photos: In the image below, members of the Network cut a cake to celebrate the 2nd anniversary of the Network on January 24. The image at the top of this article features members of the Network who participated in PBI’s training sessions along with PBI’s Daniel Wang’ombe.

PBI, women human rights defenders, and the UN high-level meeting on the Beijing Declaration

On Wednesday September 23, the United Nations will convene a high-level meeting in New York City to mark the 25th anniversary of the Fourth World Conference on Women that took place in Beijing, China in September 1995.

What is the Beijing Platform?

The Fourth World Conference on Women: Action for Equality, Development and Peace produced the Beijing Declaration and Platform for Action.

The 38-point Beijing Declaration committed to ensuring, “the full implementation of the human rights of women and of the girl child as an inalienable, integral and indivisible part of all human rights and fundamental freedoms.”

It also identified twelve critical areas of concern: “poverty, education and training, health, violence, armed conflict, economy, power and decision-making, institutional mechanisms, human rights, media, environment, and the girl child.”

Violence against Women Environmental Human Rights Defenders

The situation continues to be critical for women.

On January 29 of this year, the International Union for the Conservation of Nature (IUCN) released a major new study titled: Gender-based violence and environment linkages: The violence of inequality. It found that “climate breakdown and the global crisis of environmental degradation are increasing violence against women and girls.”

Chapter 6 of the IUCN report, titled Gender-based violence in defending land, territories and the environment – The situation of women environmental human rights defenders, can be found on pages 162 to 180.

That chapter highlights, “Statistics provided by the Mesoamerican Women Human Rights Defenders Initiative (IM-Defensoras) found that a total of 609 aggressions against WEHRDs were recorded between 2015 and 2016 in Mexico and Central America alone. In this same region, between 2012 and 2016, at least 42 WEHRDs were killed.”

It also explains, “Violence against WEHRDs in the public and private sector is interlinked with and rooted in social, economic and political power relations, including gender discrimination, an unequal division of labour, and pre-existing levels of violence.”

“WEHRDs thus endure gender-differentiated violence, whether as users and managers of natural resources, as victims of abuse by state or non-state actors, or as journalists, lawyers, educators, indigenous leaders or everyday citizens concerned over the degradation of the environment and natural resources.”

Canada and WHRDs

The Voices at Risk: Canada’s Guidelines on Supporting Human Rights Defenders developed by Global Affairs Canada for Canadian missions (embassies, consulates, high commissions) has an annex on Women Human Rights Defenders (pages 25-27).

Those guidelines note, “Missions should address the situation of women HRDs in their reporting, noting in particular the occurrence of any threats or attacks against them and their ability to undertake their work in safety, as well as practices that are potentially harmful and areas where they can be supported to mitigate risks.”

While these are important guidelines, concerns have been raised by Canadian civil society about the voluntary, non-compulsory nature of them. 

PBI and Women Human Rights Defenders

In February 2015, Joke Oranje, a Board member with Peace Brigades International-Netherlands, wrote, “As defenders of human rights, women face all the resistance and risks that are part of it, even more so, since their position is vulnerable because they cannot be sure that people will respect their own rights as women.”

She continues, “In terms of protecting human rights defenders, a few Dutch organizations joined the initiative of Peace Brigades International in the Netherlands to organize a conference in 2014 with female human rights defenders from Guatemala, Colombia, Sudan, Mexico, Egypt, Afghanistan and Palestine on protection issues.”

Oranje highlights, “From the perspectives of Peace Brigades and our partners, it is recommended that more work should be done to protect women activists against intimidation, slander, abduction, rape and murder and to promote their full participation in peace negotiations and environmental, indigenous and women’s rights movements.”

PBI Toolkits

Oranje also notes, “[After the conference in the Netherlands in 2014], some 20 other NGOs joined efforts to develop a toolkit on the protection of women human rights defenders [in 2015].” The following year, in 2016, PBI-Kenya also developed and published a Toolkit for WHRDs in Nairobi’s Urban Settlements.

PBI accompaniment of WHRDs

The most recent Peace Brigades International Annual Review notes 53 per cent (705) of the human rights defenders we accompany in Colombia, Guatemala, Honduras, Kenya and Mexico are women. Additionally, 68 per cent (298) of the volunteers who worked in our field projects, country groups and our international office are women.

The annual review also highlights, “To commemorate the International Women Human Rights Defenders Day (WHRDs Day), PBI launched the Remarkable Women campaign to highlight the tireless work of WHRDs around the world and invite the international community to #standwithher.”

Upcoming dates

The United Nations Commission on the Status of Women will hold a 25-year review and appraisal of the Beijing Platform’s implementation in March, the high-level meeting on the Platform will take place on September 23, and the annual International Women Human Rights Defenders Day is on November 29.

Mitchell Goldberg on Canada’s moral and legal obligations to climate migrants

This past January, the United Nations Human Rights Committee, a body of independent experts mandated to oversee compliance with the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, which has 170+ parties, including Canada, issued this 16-page ruling on human rights obligations to climate migrants.

Professor Jane McAdam, director of the Kaldor centre for international refugee law at the University of New South Wales, has commented, “What’s really important here, and why it’s quite a landmark case, is that the committee recognised that without robust action on climate at some point in the future it could well be that governments will, under international human rights law, be prohibited from sending people to places where their life is at risk or where they would face inhuman or degrading treatment.”

That view is supported by John H. Knox, the former UN Special Rapporteur on human rights and environmental issues, in this series of tweets commenting on the ruling.

Now, CBC reports, “Currently, there are no specific provisions for people seeking asylum on the grounds of climate change under Canadian immigration and refugee law.”

That article – titled Does Canada have a ‘moral and legal obligation’ to allow climate migrants? – quotes Montreal-based Mitchell Goldberg who was a Peace Brigades International volunteer in Guatemala in 1989-1990.

In 2009, he reflected on that time, “We accompanied refugee leaders negotiating a potential return from Mexico and threatened human rights groups inside the country. During my stay two women and I were attacked by death squads. We filed complaints, but we have reason to believe the culprits are found within the Guatemalan military. A glimpse into refugee reality. Yet I have a country of safe haven, and that country is home.”

In 2011, Goldberg co-founded the Canadian Association of Refugee Lawyers.

Goldberg tells CBC News senior writer Adam Jacobson that the Canadian government will need to take urgent policy and legislative action in order to account for the “very threatening new reality” of forced migration due to climate change.

Goldberg adds, “Every time the Canadian government provides subsidies to the gas sector, every time it builds another pipeline, we should be thinking of the impact it will have on millions of people around the world living in already precarious situations.”

He says, “There is a very powerful moral and legal obligation, especially for Canada, to step up the plate to take responsibility for our actions and the impacts we have had on millions of people around the world.”

Goldberg also notes that many countries, including Canada, will try to ignore the ruling, that the “rich countries of the world” have been against any expansion of the UN’s refugee convention, and that the UN ruling could lead to legal challenges from people whose asylum status may have been denied because it did not meet Canadian definitions.

The CBC article highlights, “According to the Internal Displacement Monitoring Centre, 17.2 million people worldwide had to leave their homes in 2019 because of disasters exacerbated by climate change.”

Peace Brigades International has field projects that accompany threatened human rights defenders in Honduras, Guatemala, Colombia and Mexico, four countries now being profoundly impacted by the climate crisis.

Last month, the Mexican National Guard and immigration agents stopped a caravan of 2,000 people, predominantly Honduran migrants and asylum-seekers.

The Peace Brigades International-Mexico Project accompanies the Saltillo Migrant Shelter which is located in the state of Coahuila on the Texas-Mexico border. That shelter provides services to hundreds of people each year transiting through Mexico to the United States. With the deepening militarization of the US-Mexico border, the shelter is experiencing an increasing number of security incidents.

Peace Brigades International-Canada will be hosting a visit by a representative of the Saltillo Migrant Shelter to Canada in mid-March. More details on this soon.

Photo of Mitchell Goldberg by CBC News.