Home Blog Page 3

Indigenous Summit for Life summons Colombian President de la Espriella for direct dialogue on November 14

Photo: The Indigenous Summit and Social Mobilization for Life.

The Peace Brigades International accompanied Association for Social Research and Action (Nomadesc) has posted on social media:

“The Indigenous Summit for Life concludes with a massive mobilization and gathering in Santander de Quilichao, where lawyer Delaespriella has been summoned for a direct dialogue on November 14. The Summit declares to the nation and the international community that its resolutions include demanding that the current government annul the decree regarding social protest and withdraw the Ministry of the Interior’s draft proposal—which endangers the lives, safety, and freedom of the Indigenous Guard—as well as rejecting modifications to the prior consultation process and the advancement of extractive projects in ancestral territories. Santander de Quilichao, October 14, 2026. #Cauca #October14 #SocialProtest”

The video with the social media post says:

“We indigenous people and the social sectors are facing the necessity to generate our voice of resistance, our voice of protest. This government intends to dismantle our rights, it intends to expel us from our territories, The indigenous peoples say to society, to the world, we are the caretakers of oxygen and water for all, for humanity, and we say to this president that we are going to defend our territories.

The summit said that in one month we had to get to the place where the president of the republic was to wait, and we made it clear that we were not pressuring him. It follows a route of open dialogue, we are not violating the constitution, but on the contrary, if we reject the social decree and protest, we will not accept that as social organisations and indigenous peoples.”

The Indigenous Guard

Intercontinental Cry has explained: “Indigenous guards are elected by their communities and mandated to protect Indigenous lives and territory without the use of arms. Throughout both the civil war and the undeclared battle for territory and resources that has followed it–and carrying only the staffs that serve as their mandate of office.”

The Sur International Journal on Human Rights has also noted: “The Indigenous Guard is a collective and voluntary effort to defend life through the administration of their own law,2 peaceful resistance, the use of indigenous legislation, the defence of human rights and the promotion of peace in territories marked by violence.”

De la Espriella decree

On October 1, Prensa Latina reported: “The Regional Indigenous Council of Cauca (CRIC) today rejected a draft decree [that reforms Decree 1066 of 2015] of the National Government of Colombia whose purpose would be the dismantling of the Indigenous Guard, according to that organization. …[CRIC] pointed out that the existence of this mechanism does not derive from the recognition, authorization or regulation of the State, but from the mandate of the communities and traditional authorities, as part of their organizational processes and self-government.”

Quatroges also explains: “For the CRIC, a national information system administered from Bogotá could change the relationship between communities and public institutions. The organization warns that the data collected could facilitate mechanisms for monitoring, stigmatization, and prosecution of people engaged in territorial defense, particularly in regions where illegal armed organizations persist.”

Accompaniment

Peace Brigades International has accompanied Nomadesc since 2011 and its president Berenice Celeita since 1999.

The Mobile Anti-Riot Squads (ESMAD), the police unit implicated in multiple killings, returns in Colombia

Photo: In May 2026, PBI-Colombia accompanied dhColombia at the hearings in the case of Castillo de la Ossa who was killed by the Esmad.

The Madrid-based digital newspaper Demócrata reports: “The Colombian Executive has initiated a new reorganization of the National Police by which the former Dialogue and Order Maintenance Unit (UNDMO), created during the mandate of former president Gustavo Petro, will be replaced by another structure with a different name and will again incorporate a riot squad to act in contexts of social protest.”

The article further explains: “The UNDMO will be replaced by the National Anti-Riot Unit (UNADI), which in turn will incorporate the Mobile Anti-Riot Squads (ESMAD), thus recovering the name and the acronym that were used before the reforms promoted by Petro’s Government (2022-2026).”

Infobae also now reports: “The National Police changed the name of the Unit for Dialogue and Maintenance of Order (Undmo). It will now be called the National Anti-Riot Unit (UNADI). …According to the document issued by the Police, the unit will have the following internal organizational structure: Subcommand of the National Anti-Riot Unit (Sunad); Operational Monitoring Group (Gusop); Regional Riot Control (Radis); Mobile Anti-Riot Squad (Esmad). …[Esmad] is a dependency of the Radis. It is in charge of carrying out operational activities in the attention to scenarios of agglomeration of people and alteration of public order that may affect the coexistence and security of citizens, such as ‘riots, riots, riots and other behaviors.’”

And El Nuevo Dia comments: “The return of the Esmad denomination reopens the debate on the management of social protest in Colombia, because the 2022 change had given priority to the concept of dialogue and maintenance of order.”

The ESMAD

In December 2019, Justice for Colombia noted: “At least 34 people have been killed by Colombia’s Mobile Anti-Disturbance Squadron (ESMAD) since it was created 20 years ago, according to new findings published by the Colombian NGO Temblores.”

By May 2021, Reuters, reporting on 40 deaths after two weeks of national strike protests, reported: “The police and its ESMAD riot squad are presumed responsible for 11 killings, the ombudsman has previously said.”

PBI accompaniment

Peace Brigades International has accompanied activities, demands for justice, and memorials related to people killed by the Esmad including Castillo de la Ossa, Kevin Anthony Agudelo, Michael Andrés Aranda Perez and Harold Antonio Rodríguez, Brayan Niño, Nicolas Neira and Dilan Cruz.

The call to dismantle the ESMAD

Several PBI accompanied organizations – including dhColombia, the Association for Social Research and Action (Nomadesc), the Committee in Solidarity with Political Prisoners (CSPP), and the Regional Corporation for the Defence of Human Rights (Credhos) – had previously called for the ESMAD to be dismantled.

In June 2023, the Petro government changed the name of the ESMAD to the Dialogue and Order Maintenance Unit (UNDMO). At least three PBI accompanied organizations – including the CSPP, the José Alvear Restrepo Lawyers Collective (CCAJAR), and the Corporation for Judicial Liberty (CJL) – stated that this reform was insufficient.

Canadian unions supported this call

In May 2021, the Canadian Labour Congress (CLC), the Public Service Alliance of Canada (PSAC) and the National Union of Public and General Employees (NUPGE) supported the call for the dismantling of the ESMAD.

The CLC statement highlighted: “Canadian unions condemn this violence and support the legitimate demands of the Colombian people for: The dismantling of the Colombian national police riot control unit (known by its Spanish acronym ESMAD).”

The demand to Canada to stop equipping the police

PBI-Colombia has raised the issue of police violence with Canadian Embassy representatives several times, including on August 4, November 29, December 1, 2021. At that December 1, 2021, meeting, Nomadesc requested guarantees that Canada does not assist the Colombian police with equipment.

We continue to follow this.

Further reading: Credhos and CSPP raise concerns about the right to protest in Colombia with the implementation of Decree 1525 (PBI-Canada, October 15, 2026).

Indigenous rights defenders mobilize for National Day of Action at First Nations-First Ministers Meeting in Ottawa, October 26

Image for National Day of Action.

The Canadian Press reports: “The [provincial] premiers, [Canadian Prime Minister Mark] Carney and First Nations representatives [mostly regional chiefs from the Assembly of First Nations] are set to meet in Ottawa on Oct. 26, just as tensions are rising over the federal and provincial governments’ major projects agenda.”

Another Canadian Press article notes: “Chiefs are set to meet with Carney and the country’s premiers in Ottawa later this month, and major projects are expected to be a major topic of debate.”

Those major projects include the Pacific Link oil pipeline (on Secwepemc territory), the Prince Rupert Gas Transmission pipeline (on Gitanyow and Gitxsan territory), and LNG Canada Phase 2 (on Wet’suwet’en territory).

The first article explains: “There will be 28 seats in the main meeting room [at the John G. Diefenbaker Building at 111 Sussex Drive] — one for the prime minister, one for the national chief [Cindy Woodhouse Nepinak], 13 for provincial and territorial leaders and 13 for First Nations representatives.”

Wet’suwet’en Hereditary Chief Na’Moks, whose lands and waters would be impacted by LNG Canada Phase 2, tells APTN News that he has not been invited to this meeting but: “I want to attend and I may attend.”

The Canadian Press further notes: “Topics up for discussion at the meeting include long-term political governance — including rights and treaties, jurisdiction, health care, policing and land — economic partnerships and prosperity.”

National Day of Action

In response, a National Day of Action is being organized by a coordinating group of Tori Cress (Anishinaabe), Russ Diabo (Kahnawake Mohawk), Kanahus Manuel (Secwepemc and Ktunaxa), Tarek Maussili (Cree), Rolland Pangowish (Anishinabe), Rachel Snow (Iyahe Nakoda) and Suzanne Smoke (Anishinaabe).

The Truth Before Reconciliation Education & Advocacy Network website provides information about this National Day of Action.

That website warns: “This meeting could lock in municipal-style governance, focus only on services (water, policing, social issues), and ignore land, Treaties, sovereignty, and real self-determination. If the meeting only talks about ‘services’, we lose ground.”

And it highlights three demands: “1) Recognition and Respect for Aboriginal Title, Inherent Rights, and Treaties. 2) A New Policy Framework based on Nation-to-Nation relations, not federal delegation. 3) Restoration and Restitution for lands and resources taken without consent.”

The “Statement of Support for the October 26, 2026 National Day of Action” declares that “colonial governments will not write the future for our collective First Nations”. Signatories to that statement include Bridget Tolley, Sylvia Macadam, Sheelah Mclean, and Roseanne Archibald.

We continue to follow this.

Additional reading

–What could the Bill C-39 promise of speed for major projects mean for Indigenous land and environmental defenders? (PBI-Canada, September 22, 2026)

–Indigenous leaders and journalist association concerned by the continued delay in the release of the CRCC report on the RCMP C-IRG (PBI-Canada, September 25, 2026).

National day of action poster.

Guatemalan human rights defender Leocadio Juracán to speak on Denman Island, November 1

Leocadio Juracán, the agrarian reform coordinator of the Campesino Committee of the Altiplano (CCDA), will be speaking on Denman Island, British Columbia on Sunday November 1 starting at 3:30 pm PT.

Event poster.

Peace Brigades International and the CCDA

Photo: PBI-Guatemala with Leocadio Juracán, July 2026.

In August 2025, the Peace Brigades International-Guatemala Project posted on social media: “We stand in solidarity with Leocardio and CCDA Guatemala for repressive actions taken against the defender of human rights and access to land for indigenous communities and farmworkers This action shows what Balakrishnan Rajagopal, Rapporteur of the United Nations on the Right to Adequate Housing, that in Guatemala there is ‘a clear pattern of criminalization and intimidation towards those who attempt to protest or report these forced evictions.’”

This past summer, PBI-Guatemala also posted on social media: “On 8 July, #PBI accompanied community journalist Carlos Choc whilst he was covering proceedings at the Puerto Barrios Magistrates’ Court, where the interim hearing was held in the case against Leocadio Juracán, leader of the Altiplano Peasants’ Committee (CCDA), who was arbitrarily detained in August last year and released on alternative measures a few days later. He is currently facing trial for the alleged offence of aggravated trespass.”

Peace Brigades International accompanies the Campesino Committee of the Highlands (CCDA) of the Verapaces in the departments of Alta and Baja Verapaz, the municipality of El Estor in the department of Izabal and the Zona Reina in Quiché.

CCDA: “Representing the Highland Peasant Committee (CCDA), we share the voices and struggles of Guatemala’s Indigenous and peasant peoples during this tour of Canada, carrying the stories of communities facing land dispossession, forced evictions, and criminalization for defending their territories and rights.”

“Strengthening accompaniment”: Peace Brigades International-Canada annual review 2026 (the year so far)

Photo: PBI-Canada coordinator Brent Patterson at a People’s Front in Defence of Land and Water protest in Mexico City, February 2026.

Throughout 2026, Peace Brigades International-Canada worked to document, contextualize and amplify the accompaniment of organizations, human rights defenders and communities by the PBI field projects Colombia, Guatemala, Honduras and Mexico – on a daily basis.

We organized two webinars to encourage people to apply to be “brigadistas”, field volunteers with these projects.

We travelled to Mexico and Honduras to participate in the PBI-Mexico and PBI-Honduras physical accompaniment of defenders.

We monitored the situations for human rights defenders and amplified Alerts and Urgent Actions to improve their security situation at key moments.

And we observed numerous marches and protests in Ottawa, including protests by Filipino youth while highlighting the launch of the new Peace Brigades International-Southeast Asia Project in April of this year.

Watch for our upcoming activities in November and December!

Below are just a few of the 472 articles we posted this year that highlight our work (just click on the title of the articles below to read more):

OCTOBER

–PBI-Canada hosts webinar to promote PBI-Honduras call for field volunteers, deadline to apply is October 30

–PBI-Research Unit initial study of the “Cantera Sapadril” open-pit non-metallic mine in Honduras

–PBI-Canada welcomes United Steelworkers report on strengthening Protection Mechanisms for trade unionists in Mexico

–PBI-Canada attentive to the risks that could be faced by environmental defenders by de la Espriella reopening fracking in Colombia

SEPTEMBER

–PBI-Canada present at the 2026 Labour Day march in Ottawa

–PBI-Canada attentive to Wet’suwet’en land defenders responding to the LNG Canada Phase 2 final investment decision

–PBI-Canada says #HandsOffDaniloRamos as the Filipino human rights defender travels to Toronto for the Kapit Bisig conference

–PBI-Canada monitors the situation on Cayos Cochinos as Garifuna leader Mabel Robledo denounces TV show on ancestral territory

AUGUST

–PBI-Canada interview with PBI co-founder Daniel N. Clark on the 45th anniversary of the founding of Peace Brigades International

–PBI-Canada present at the Ottawa Dyke March that welcomes Queers for Palestine and Labour for Palestine

–PBI-Canada present at the 2026 March for Trans Rights in Ottawa

–PBI-Canada observes court hearing where Swiss arms dealer receives absolute discharge for assault at CANSEC arms show

JULY

–PBI-Canada observes Filipino youth protest in Ottawa to denounce the visit of the president of the Philippines to Canada

–PBI-Canada notes PBI call for European Council to “oppose increase in the EU defence budget”

JUNE

–PBI-Canada contributes text for PBI intervention at the UN Human Rights Council about the digital surveillance of Indigenous land defenders

–PBI-Canada participates in APG-organized call with Global Affairs Canada on the Mexico-Canada Human Rights Dialogue

–PBI-Canada notes while the UN has called for strengthening the CORE, the Canadian government has “eliminated” the position

–PBI-Canada attentive to the situation for human rights defenders in the context of the presidential election on June 21 in Colombia

MAY

–PBI-Canada observes Shut Down CANSEC protest at annual weapons show at Cohere Centre in Ottawa

–PBI-Canada coordinator moderates panel with land defenders, peasant leader, activists discussing militarism, megaprojects

–PBI-Canada following the Mexico-Canada Dialogue on Human Rights and Multilateral Issues in Ottawa

–PBI-Canada observes vígil for the Toboso 19 outside the Embassy of the Philippines, May Day call to shut down CANSEC in Ottawa

APRIL

–PBI-Canada observes call from Chief Na’Moks, Gwii Lok’im Gibuu and Katisha Paul against EDC financing of megaprojects

–PBI-Canada meets with Filipino human rights defender Danilo “Ka Daning” Ramos in Ottawa

–PBI-Canada participates in “Resisting CANSEC with Quaker Roots” webinar with Canadian Friends Service Committee

–PBI-Canada remembers Indigenous Lenca water defender Berta Cáceres protesting the FTAA in Quebec City in April 2001

MARCH

–PBI-Canada and PBI-Honduras meet with the National Union of Rural Workers (CNTC) in Tegucigalpa

–PBI-Canada and PBI-Honduras accompany COPINH on the 10th anniversary of the sowing of Berta Caceres

–PBI-Canada highlights the need to strengthen the Protection Mechanism in Mexico at APG-organized call with Global Affairs Canada

–PBI-Canada amplifies COPINH criticism of the State of Honduras response to the IACHR-CIDH interdisciplinary report on the murder of Berta Cáceres

FEBRUARY

–PBI-Canada co-organizes webinar with PBI-Mexico and Espacio OSC on Protection Mechanism for human rights defenders and journalists

–PBI-Canada and PBI-Mexico accompany the People’s Front in Defence of Land and Water at activities over four-day period

–PBI-Canada and PBI-Mexico accompany People’s Front at press conference and rally in memory of Samir Flores Soberanes

–PBI-Canada and PBI-Mexico meet with the Embassy of Canada in Mexico to highlight the need to strengthen the Protection Mechanism

JANUARY

–PBI-Canada observes protest in Ottawa against US military action in Venezuela, amplifies concerns of human rights defenders

–PBI-Canada continues to monitor the Civilian Review and Complaints Commission systemic investigation of the RCMP C-IRG

–PBI-Canada amplifies the call for the international community to ensure the safety of COPINH following the IACHR GIEI report

–PBI-Canada congratulates the Peaceful Resistance of La Puya as ICSID arbitration panel rejects claim by US mining company

For more, please see our “News Updates” here.

Additional reading: “Making space for peace”: Peace Brigades International-Canada annual review 2025 (December 8, 2025).

What organizations, defenders and communities does PBI accompany in Colombia, Guatemala, Honduras and Mexico?

The websites of the Peace Brigades International projects in Mexico, Guatemala, Honduras and Mexico each list the organizations, defenders and communities that they physically accompany with the support of field volunteers.

PBI-Canada compiles these project-specific lists below:

Mexico

1-Peoples’ Front in Defense of Land and Water (FPDTA-MPT)

2-Human Rights Solidarity Network (RSDH)

3-Ejído El Bajío

4-Yoreme Alliance

5-Committee of Relatives of the Detained and Disappeared “Until we find them”

PBI-Mexico also has “strategic alliances” including the National Human Rights Network All Rights for All (Red TdT) and participates in “civil society coordination spaces” including the Civil Society Organizations Space for the Protection of Human Rights Defenders and Journalists (Espacio OSC).

Honduras

6-Alternative Community and Environmental Reclamation of Honduras (ARCAH)

7-National Central of Rural Workers (CNTC)

8-Civic Council of Popular and Indigenous Organizations of Honduras (COPINH)

9-Arcoiris LGBT Rainbow Association of Honduras

10-Honduran Center for the Promotion of Community Development (CEHPRODEC)

11-Center for LGBTI Development and Cooperation – Somos CDC

Guatemala

12-Carlos Ernesto Choc

13-Narciso Marcos Chegüén

14-Human Rights Law Firm (BDH)

15-Association for Justice and Reconciliation

16-Indigenous Community of San Francisco Quezaltepeque

17-Maya Ch’orti’ Indigenous Council of Olopa

18-Association of Relatives of the Detained and Disappeared of Guatemala (FAMDEGUA)

19-Accompanying the Luz Leticia case

20-Network for the Defense of Food Sovereignty (REDSAG)

21-Peaceful Resistance of the Poqomán People in Chinautla

22-Verapaz Union of Peasant Organisations (UVOC)

Colombia

23-Association for Research and Social Action (Nomadesc)

24-Nydia Érika Bautista Foundation (FNEB)

25-Peasant Association of Catatumbo (Ascamcat)

26-Peasant Association of the Cimitarra River Valley (ACVC)

27-Humanitarian Action Corporation for Coexistence and Peace in Northeastern Antioquia (Cahucopana)

28-Inter-Church Commission for Justice and Peace (J&P)

29-Claudia Julieta Duque

30-Peace Community of San José de Apartadó

31-Association Network of Human Rights Defenders (dhColombia)

PBI-Mexico also has “strategic allied organizations” including the José Alvear Restrepo Lawyers’ Collective (Cajar), the Regional Corporation for the Defense of Human Rights (Credhos), the Foundation Committee of Solidarity with Political Prisoners (CSPP), and the Corporación Jurídica Libertad (CJL).

For PBI-Canada articles on these accompanied organizations, defenders and communities, strategic allied organizations, and more, click here.

Credhos and CSPP raise concerns about the right to protest in Colombia with the implementation of Decree 1525

Photo: ASCAMCAT took part in mobilizations held in Cúcuta, Ocaña, and Pamplona on October 14, 2026.

Tens of thousands of trade union members, social movement activists, community members, students, and Indigenous peoples took part in a massive opposition protest across Colombia on October 14, 2026.

The Regional Corporation for the Defence of Human Rights (Credhos), the Association for Social Research and Action (Nomadesc), the Humanitarian Action Corporation for Coexistence and Peace in Northeast Antioquia (Cahucopana), and the Catatumbo Peasant Organization (Ascamcat) were among those who took to the streets.

Cahucopana, Nomadesc and Ascamcat are physically accompanied by PBI-Colombia. Credhos and the CSPP are strategic allied organizations.

Photo: The placard at the march in Cali says: “Health for the people and dignity for the worker”. Photo by Nomadesc.

Credhos on Decree 003

On October 9, 2026, Ivan Madero Vergel, the president of the Regional Corporation for the Defence of Human Rights (Credhos), stated at a press conference: “We are going to make use of this day of October 14 of national mobilization, the right to the Decree 003 of 2021. [We ask] the governments, the mayors, especially the mayor of Barrancabermeja and the mayors of the region of the Magdalena Medio to respect the right to social protest enshrined in the decree 003 of 2021.”

Madero Vergel highlighted: “[Decree 003] establishes in its article 12 the coordination of the districts, of the municipalities, of the mayors establish a coordination to regulate the use of the public force the presence of the police authorities and the army in the social protest but also the interlocution from the social movement and the movement of the social protest [to observe] the use of the force of the police and the army and the performance of themselves in the social protest.”

Video still: Madero Vergel speaks at press conference, October 9, 2026.

What is Decree 003?

Decree 003 was passed on January 5, 2021, by the government of President Iván Duque after nationwide strikes and protests began on November 21, 2019, and just prior to the National Strike that began on April 28, 2021.

The full text of Decree 003 can be read here.

The provisions of Decree 003 include: “Law enforcement officials involved in the monitoring of assemblies should respect and ensure the exercise of the fundamental rights of organizers and participants, while protecting journalists, observers, medical personnel and other members of the public, as well as public and private property, from harm. The basic approach of the authorities should, where necessary, be to try to facilitate peaceful assemblies.”

What is Decree 1525?

On Tuesday October 13, the day before major protests across Colombia, President Abelardo de la Espriella signed Decree 1525.

The full text of Decree 1525 can be read here.

Under Decree 1525 authorities must seek dialogue with the demonstrators, but this is not “a prerequisite that conditions, suspends or postpones the intervention actions directed individually against those who carry out acts of violence.”

“Who sets limits on protest?” – CSPP

On October 9, the Committee for Solidarity with Political Prisoners (CSPP) posted on social media: “Who sets limits on protest? The reform to Decree 003 of 2021 raises concerns regarding dialogue, police intervention, and the participation of human rights organizations. Managing disruptions cannot be an excuse to limit mobilization. Preventing risks cannot turn into surveillance or the stigmatization of protesters. Protest is a right. Defending it means defending the ability to make demands, speak out against wrongs, and challenge the status quo.”

The 4-minute video alongside this text highlights: “It hinders the participation of … human rights organisations in the PMU [Unified Command Post, a temporary inter-institutional coordination space activated before and during public demonstrations]. The proposal contemplates the participation of economic actors, private actors, and other actors while limiting the participation of human rights organisations and civil society.”

Undmo or Esmad?

Infobae reports that at the protests that took place on October 14, “the Undmo [the Dialogue and Public Order Maintenance Unit] intervened on six occasions: two of them in Bogotá, two in Ibagué and one in Popayán and Medellín respectively…”

The Undmo is the rebranded name for the controversial Mobile Anti-Disturbance Squadron (Esmad). The government of President Gustavo Petro renamed the Esmad to the Undmo in August 2022 following the National Strike of 2021.

President de la Espriella appears to still call the unit the Esmad.

On October 15, de la Espriella commented: “Small revolts; as soon as the Esmad arrived, they were all lost. When they feel the forcefulness of the State, they know that we are going to face them with determination.”

Alert on Undmo intervention

The Committee for Solidarity with Political Prisoners (CSPP) is affiliated with the Defend Liberty Campaign.

Yesterday the Defend Liberty Campaign posted on social media: “URGENT IBAGUÉ. October 14, 2026. We are issuing an alert regarding the intervention of the Dialogue and Order Maintenance Unit (UNDMO) during the social protest taking place in Ibagué. We demand that the National Police respect and guarantee the right to social protest, refrain from the arbitrary or disproportionate use of force, and protect the lives and physical integrity of the protesters. Videos circulating on social media show the Police detaining protesters. We demand that their lives and personal integrity be respected and that their rights be fully guaranteed.”

We continue to follow this.

Video still from Defender la Libertad.

Looking back at the CAJAR legal defence of three trade unionists at Ecopulpack S.A.S. in Colombia

In November 2024, the José Alvear Restrepo Lawyers’ Collective (Cajar) posted: “Criminal Judge 2 of the Zipaquira Circuit, Gabriel Darío Hincapié, acquitted three trade unionists of the Ecopulpack S.A.S. company of all charges against them and stated that there was persecution against them for their determination to found and maintain the union of the workers of that company: Sinaltraindustrias.”

“The president of Cajar, Yessika Hoyos, and the lawyer Sebastián Escobar, representatives of the three workers, stressed that it is proven that the company exerted pressure and threats against its employees for wanting to found a union and promote the rights of workers in a context of job insecurity, persecuting them until they managed to get the majority to resign from the union.”

“From Cajar, together with other human rights and trade union organizations, have stated that acts of harassment, persecution and criminalization of trade union action threaten the freedoms of workers in Colombia and ignore the scope and protection that the High Courts and the Committee on Freedom of Association of the International Labor Organization (ILO) have granted to this fundamental right.”

The CAJAR statement added: “Despite this important decision, we regret to inform that after having been acquitted and in a new act of persecution against its employees, Pulpack delivered a letter of dismissal to two of the people acquitted in this process and, in addition, prohibited them from entering the company from the date and until the end of their contract.”

The full statement from CAJAR can be read at: Tras ser absueltos, dos trabajadores de Ecopulpack fueron despedidos en un nuevo acto de discriminación antisindical (Cajar, November 26, 2024).

Accompaniment

Peace Brigades International has accompanied the José Alvear Restrepo Lawyers’ Collective (CAJAR) since 1995.

Further reading: Credhos, Nomadesc, Cahucopana take part in the National Mobilization with Colombian unions, social movements the day after Decree 1525 (PBI-Canada, October 14, 2026).

What happened to the Wet’suwet’en petition to the IACHR about RCMP C-IRG violence against land and environmental defenders?

Video still: Wet’suwet’en land defender Sleydo’ addresses the IACHR virtual hearing, July 10, 2023.

On July 10, 2023, Wet’suwet’en Hereditary Chief Na’Moks and Sleydo’, Wing Chief of the Cas Yikh House (Grizzly Bear House), Gidimt’en Clan, presented at a virtual hearing of the Inter-American Commission on Human Rights (IACHR).

The video of their presentation can be seen on YouTube.

PBI-Canada watched that virtual hearing.

Sleydo’ told the hearing: “In 2021 I was occupying a tiny house alongside the road to [Coastal GasLink] CGL’s proposed drill site when we were surrounded by militarized police [from the C-IRG] in green fatigues with assault rifles who were dropped out of helicopters all around us. They cut the internet, trained their snipers on us from behind buildings and heavy machinery and used an axe and then a chainsaw to illegally break down the door without an arrest or search warrant.”

Video: “Dramatic Video Shows Militarized Canadian Police Raid Wet’suwet’en Land Defenders & Journalists” on November 19, 2021 (Democracy Now!).

At the hearing, Hugh Adsett, Canada’s Ambassador to the Organization of American States, commented: “My goal in participating today is primarily to gain a better understanding of the petitioners’ concerns and provide some general and initial context that may help inform the commission’s own analysis.”

IACHR Commissioner Carlos Bernal Pulido told the hearing: “It is disappointing that the state did not prepare a full response to the allegations.”

The IACHR summary of that public hearing can be read here.

That summary notes: “The State said that it was committed to working with all parties and to providing the IACHR with more information. The IACHR thanked the State and civil society for their presence, requested information on how the Principle of Free and Informed Consent is applied, and highlighted the facilitating role that the IACHR could play in spaces for dialogue.”

Status of petition

There does not appear to be any further public posts about the IACHR petition, specifically from Canada on how the principle of free, prior and informed consent is applied.

CRCC systemic investigation

The next moment may be when the Civilian Review and Complaint Commission (CRCC) releases its “systemic investigation” into the conduct of the RCMP Community-Industry Response Group.

The terms of reference for that investigation notes:

“Where appropriate, the systemic investigation will also identify the extent to which C-IRG’s operations and actions meet, reflect, consider or are consistent with the standards and expectations set by Bill C‑15, An Act respecting the United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples, the British Columbia Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples Act (DRIPA) and the calls for justice from the Missing and Murdered Indigenous Women and Girls Inquiry (MMIWG).”

DRIPA references the principle of free, prior and informed consent noted by the IACHR in its hearing summary.

It is expected that the CRCC report will be released next month.

PBI-Canada remains attentive to the findings and recommendations of this report. We intend to convene a webinar at that time to hear reactions and comments from land defenders and policy analysts about the report.

Further reading

–MEDIA ADVISORY: Wet’suwet’en Nation hearing at Inter-American Commission on Human Rights (Amnesty International, July 4, 2023)

–Wet’suwet’en leaders highlight RCMP C-IRG violence in presentation to Inter-American Commission on Human Rights (PBI-Canada, July 19, 2023).

PBI-Canada examines language on human rights defenders in the “Updated draft” of the UN Binding Treaty

On October 12, 2026, the 12th session of negotiations of the UN Treaty to regulate transnational corporations under Human Rights law began at the United Nations Human Rights Council in Geneva, Switzerland.

The Updated draft legally binding instrument to regulate, in international human rights law, the activities of transnational corporations and other business enterprises submitted by States during the ninth, tenth and eleventh sessions of the open-ended intergovernmental working group (OEIGWG) can be read here.

In the two main areas where “human rights defenders” are mentioned, there does appear to be some effort by specific States to weaken the language.

This can be seen in Preamble 13 and section 6.4 (e).

Preamble 13

6.4 (e)

Commentary

Overall, Lawyers for Human Rights and partners have commented: “The Updated Draft Treaty’s language has shifted from stronger language typical of international human rights law instruments to softer terms found in the United Nations Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights (UNGPs), which contain obligations for states and responsibilities for corporations, and other similar soft law frameworks.”

Still they note: “The ongoing negotiations in 2026 presents an opportunity to highlight the gaps in the current Updated Draft Treaty that requires addressing if the final version of the treaty is to be meaningful for those it is envisioned to protect, namely frontline communities, including indigenous communities and human rights defenders, who have historically borne the burden of harmful practices by business.”

The Checkmate campaign

ESCR-Net – the International Network for Economic, Social and Cultural Rights, announcing the launch of the Checkmate global campaign, has also stated: “A strong Binding Treaty must establish clear and enforceable obligations for States to regulate corporate activities, prevent human rights violations, ensure access to justice and effective remedies, and protect affected communities and human rights defenders.”

Canada and the Binding Treaty

On a PBI-United Kingdom webinar in July 2020, PBI-Colombia accompanied Yessika Hoyos from the Jose Alvear Restrepo Lawyers Collective (CCAJAR) commented: “Many companies together with the states have been blocking this issue.”

Those countries reportedly include Canada, the United States, the United Kingdom, Japan, Australia, Brazil, Russia and China.

Video still: Yessika Hoyos commenting on the Binding Treaty.

Canada has been long seen as obstructionist in achieving a Binding Treaty.

In October 2023, Via Campesina noted: “The countries who have not engaged or directly reject and have tried to stop the process are the United States, Japan, Canada and Australia, as well as other highly industrialized countries with a high number of TNCs [transnational corporations] headquartered in their territories.”

PBI supports the promise of a Binding Treaty

Speaking in March 2018, prior to the 4th session on the Binding Treaty, PBI-Switzerland stated: “PBI reiterates the importance of the participation of civil society and human rights defenders as crucial to the success of the process.”

And in September 2018, PBI-Mexico commented: “After 7 years of the Guiding Principles being in force, PBI has not witnessed an improvement in the situation of risk for human rights defenders on the ground.” The MEP then noted: “PBI believes that a Binding Treaty could potentially lead to greater protection of human rights defenders working on business and human rights cases.”

PBI-Canada continues to follow this.

Further reading

–PBI-Canada follows the UN talks on a Binding Treaty on business and human rights in Geneva, October 20-24 (PBI-Canada, October 22, 2025)

–PBI-Canada hosts webinar on UN COP and Binding Treaty processes and the protection of environmental defenders (PBI-Canada, December 3, 2024).