Home Blog Page 396

Where is the Canadian government on due diligence legislation and a Binding Treaty on transnational corporations?

The lack of a legal, enforceable framework to hold Canadian-based transnational corporations responsible for identifying, preventing and mitigating the human rights impacts of their business activities is an ongoing concern.

Beyond guidelines and principles, there is a global call for binding national and international laws that would prevent human rights abuses by transnationals.

The Canadian Network on Corporate Accountability has observed: “A growing number of jurisdictions worldwide are acknowledging the failure of voluntary initiatives to curb corporate abuse and have either enacted or are currently examining legislation to hold companies legally accountable when their operations cause harm.”

Most recently, on July 27, Trócaire, the official overseas development agency of the Catholic Church in Ireland, stated: “The new Programme for [the Irish] Government commits to review whether there is a need for greater emphasis on mandatory due diligence in relation to business and human rights.”

Trócaire adds: “France has a law to ensure corporations respect human rights and the environment in all their overseas operations. A range of other European countries look to be following suit. The European Commission has [also] committed to legislation that would protect human rights and the environment [through due diligence].”

And Equal Times notes: “A bill has already been tabled in Switzerland but is stuck at parliamentary level. The situation is similar in Germany, where environmentalist and leftist parties have been pushing for legislation. Although their legislative proposals have not prospered, the German government has not ruled out presenting a bill in the future.”

The CNCA has previously called on the Canadian government “to learn from these experiences abroad and enact comprehensive and mandatory human rights due diligence legislation that … includes meaningful consequences for non-compliance, including liability for harm and effective enforcement mechanisms.”

In response to a CNCA questionnaire, the NDP and to some degree the Green Party appear supportive of mandatory due diligence legislation that would also prevent Canadian embassies and Export Development Canada from supporting Canadian corporations linked to human rights abuses in other countries.

Unfortunately, the governing Liberal Party did not respond to the questionnaire.

The mixed results in France suggest that achieving due diligence legislation requires both a long campaign and ongoing vigilance – but that it is worthwhile.

Concurrently, PBI-Canada also supports the call for a binding global UN Treaty on Business and Human Rights.

Equal Times reports: “Progress is, however, very slow, with countries such as the United States, Russia, China and Brazil doing everything they can to block the process.”

PBI-Colombia accompanied Yessika Hoyos from the Jose Alvear Restrepo Lawyers Collective (CCAJAR) has also commented: “Many companies together with the states have been blocking this issue. They haven’t allowed for a Treaty to be created.”

And Oxfam Canada has noted: “Canadian government officials have been largely absent from the process so far.”

While Trócaire has launched a “Build Back Better” campaign that is calling for due diligence and a Binding Treaty to be part of the COVID-19 recovery planning, that momentum has not yet appeared in Canada.

That said, on the immediate horizon a draft of the Binding Treaty will be discussed at the 6th session of intergovernmental negotiations on October 26-30 in Geneva.

Globally, Peace Brigades International entities support the call for both due diligence legislation and a UN Binding Treaty.

Photo by Adrian Wyld.

On the 10th anniversary of the UN resolution, the struggle for the human right to water continues

United Nations Special Rapporteur Léo Heller writes: “Ten years ago, on 28 July 2010, the United Nations General Assembly passed Resolution 64/292, which explicitly recognized water and sanitation as a human right and acknowledged that water and sanitation are essential to the realization of all human rights.”

In the countries where PBI is present, Heller notes that Mexico and Kenya have recognized the human right to water in their constitution, and that Colombia, Guatemala, Indonesia and Nepal have recognized this right in national legislation.

The Special Rapporteur adds: “Despite all of the important efforts and progress achieved since 2010, too many people around the world are still waiting for the promise made by the General Assembly ten years ago to become a reality in their lives.”

In Kenya, PBI works with the Social Justice Centres Working Group, a collective voice for the social justice movement, that is demanding that “the government restore the water supply to all slums and crack down on the water cartels that extort Kenyans.”

In Mexico, PBI continues to express its concern that the Indigenous Mixe community of Ayutla, Oaxaca is still without drinking water three years after an attack on its water system.

In Guatemala, PBI has noted the impact of the climate crisis and the pollution from megaprojects on access to drinking water.

And in Colombia, with Canadian companies bidding for fracking pilot projects to be awarded this September/October, we share the concern expressed by Óscar Sampayo of the Alliance for a Colombia Free of Fracking that: “We cannot allow the water resource, which is the most precious thing we have, to be affected.”

We also note that on unceded Indigenous territories and reserves within Canada the human rights to water and sanitation remain an unfulfilled promise. PBI-Canada has highlighted that the $19 billion the Canadian government intends to spend on new warplanes in 2022 would be better spent on fulfilling these rights.

We are also concerned by the impact on these rights by megaprojects in Canada, including the dismissal by the Supreme Court of Canada earlier this month of the appeal against the Trans Mountain tar sands pipeline that passes through the aquifer of the C’eletkwmx people (Coldwater Indian Band) in British Columbia.

PBI-Canada celebrates the 10th anniversary of the UN’s recognition of the human rights to water and sanitation and supports the human rights defenders (HRDs) and land and environmental rights defenders (LERDs) who struggle for these rights to be realized.

PBI-Canada supports VOW Peace day of action against $19 billion for new fighter jets

On Friday July 24, Peace Brigades International-Canada and World Beyond War supported the Canadian Voice of Women for Peace (VOW Peace) cross-country day of action against the Canadian government’s plan to spend $19 billion on new fighter jets.

It was also supported by the Regina Peace Council, Pax Christi Toronto, Ottawa Peace Council, Pacifi, KW Peace, Conscience Canada, Pivot2Peace, Women’s International League for Peace & Freedom (WILPF) Canada, Ottawa Raging Grannies, Labour Against the Arms Trade, Hamilton Coalition to Stop The War, and others.

The day of action against new fighter jets was noted in the: Aldergrove Star, Barrie Today, Collingwood Today, Peterborough Examiner, Winnipeg Sun, Beach Metro News, Saskatoon Star-Phoenix and The Tyee.

Please also find below a selection of photos from that day.

Winnipeg

Toronto

Toronto

Ottawa

Vancouver

Sidney

Regina

Collingwood

Toronto

Toronto

Hamilton

Ottawa

Montreal

Peterborough

Victoria

Kitchener

Waterloo

Halifax

Montreal

Aldergrove

Vancouver

London

For more information and resources, please see the Canadian Voice of Women for Peace No Fighter Jets campaign webpage.

Secwepemc land defenders face risks as construction of the Trans Mountain pipeline proceeds near Blue River

Twitter photo by Brandi Morin: “Ceremony starting ahead of arrival of protestors against Tiny House Warriors living at Secwepemc traditional territories set in the path of TMX [Trans Mountain] pipeline expansion.”

On July 25, Secwepemc land defenders and allies gathered in Blue River (located about 230 kilometres north of Kamloops) in continued opposition to the construction of the Trans Mountain pipeline on Secwepemc territory in British Columbia.

The pipeline project, now owned by the Canadian government, would cross 518 kilometres of Secwepemc territory and move 890,000 barrels per day of bitumen oil from northern Alberta to the British Columbia coast for export on super tankers.

Opposition to megaproject, violence against Indigenous women

Earlier this month, 610AM reported: “Trans Mountain has started initial construction on its pipeline expansion through Blue River.” That article adds: “Trans Mountain says a [500 person] work camp in Blue River likely won’t be needed until next spring.”

In the meantime, the news report suggests that the Trans Mountain workforce is using local accommodations.

James Anaya, the former United Nations Special Rapporteur on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples, has noted: “Indigenous women have reported that the influx of workers into indigenous communities as a result of extractive projects also led to increased incidents of sexual harassment and violence, including rape and assault.”

A Secwepemc Women’s Declaration states: “Wherever man camps are set up, we face exponential increases in sexual violence.”

Pro-pipeline rally at Blue River

The Secwepemc gathering on July 25 was also organized in response to a “rally to reclaim the North Thompson Valley” that argued: “the people who rightfully call the valley home – all people – have had enough of the illegitimate protest and their vulgar and divisive methods. It’s time for them to leave.”

610AM reports: “Rally organizer Darren Bowser says his community is tired of the ‘bad behaviour’ from the Tiny House Warriors as they continue to oppose the Trans Mountain pipeline expansion in the area.”

Title and rights holders of territories

The rally also happened in the context of a July 2 statement by the Simpcw First Nation and the Tk’emlUps te Secwepemc endorsing the pipeline.

That statement adds: “The leadership of the Simpcw and Tk’emlUps te Secwepemc, expressly oppose the Tiny House Warrior’s occupation of lands within Simpcwul’ecw and denounce the threatening and aggressive conduct towards all peoples.”

Commenting on their statement of support for the pipeline, Chief Judy Wilson of the Neskonlith First Nation stated: “Even the Canadian courts – which are in a conflict of interest – recognize that Aboriginal Title and Rights are held collectively by the Indigenous Peoples, not by one or two Indian Act bands.”

Secwepemc land defender Kanahus Manuel has also responded: “Federal Indian Bands are not the rightful or collective title holders. Therefore, they can’t make decisions regarding our collective territories.”

Manuel has further explained that the elected chief-and-council system was unilaterally imposed by the federal government and has no authority outside their own reserve.

Risks faced by Secwepemc land defenders

Prior to the rally, the Union of British Columbia Indian Chiefs stated: “UBCIC deeply respects the authority and jurisdiction of all First Nations and hopes that respect and open communication can substitute any potentially violent and inflammatory actions against Indigenous land defenders.”

The UBCIC statement adds: “[The Tiny House Warriors] have experienced repeated incidences of misogyny, racism, harassment, and violence for their opposition to the pipeline and the associated work camps that imperil the safety and welfare of Indigenous women and girls.”

On July 25, Amnesty International Canada expressed concern for the potential for violence given the pro-pipeline rally and the Secwepemc gathering.

Their email to the RCMP stated: “Amnesty International is concerned that in this context there is potential for there to be tension and confrontation, and even for the situation on Saturday to flare up with personal attacks or violence.”

Land defenders globally, the need for protection from violence

The human rights organization Global Witness documented 164 killings of land and environmental defenders around the world in 2018 – “ordinary people murdered for defending their homes, forests and rivers against destructive industries.”

That violence can come from state security services, private security, business interests, community members, and others.

Among their recommendations to address this, they say “governments, companies and investors must work jointly” to “make strong public statements recognizing the important and legitimate role of land and environmental defenders in guaranteeing safe and stable communities and ecosystems, committing to their protection.”

In this instance, the Trans Mountain Corporation, which is building the pipeline, is a wholly owned subsidiary of the Canada Development Investment Corporation, a federal government-owned Crown corporation, that is accountable to the Parliament of Canada.

Does a Canadian-made engine power a Department of Homeland Security surveillance airplane deployed against Black Lives Matter protests in Portland?

The Intercept reports: “While anonymous federal agents have thrown protesters into unmarked vans and fired tear gas at Portland’s mayor in recent days, an Air Force surveillance plane designed to carry state-of-the-art sensors typically reserved for war zones has circled the Oregon city’s outskirts from above.”

Following that report, Anthony Fenton posted on Twitter: “The surveillance plane in question is powered by a @PWCanada-made engine.” This refers to Pratt & Whitney Canada, which is located in Longueuil, near Montreal.

While the Air Force has denied that this surveillance plane gathered information about the demonstrations, The Hill has also reported: “DHS aircraft have been used over protests this year to collect information on the demonstrations.”

NBC affiliate KGW8 further reports: “A small airplane registered to the U.S. Department of Homeland Security flew over protesters in downtown Portland on Wednesday [July 22] night. The Beechcraft Super King Air 350 made wide, counter-clockwise circles over demonstrators for almost three hours.”

According to this website, that engine may also have been made by Pratt & Whitney Canada near Montreal. This website also notes: “Two Pratt & Whitney Canada PT6A-60A or optional factory installed PT6A-67A turboprop engines with Hartzell four blade propellers power the King Air 350CER aircraft.”

Should we be concerned about any of the estimated $2 billion worth of Canadian-made “military goods” exported to the US each year being used in this way?

Last month, the Independent reported: “The Scottish Parliament has called for the immediate suspension of exports of riot gear, tear gas and rubber bullets to the United States, in light of the police response to the ongoing Black Lives Matter protests.”

That article also noted: “Back at the UK parliament in Westminster 166 MPs from the Labour party, the Conservatives, SNP, Liberal Democrats, Greens, Plaid Cymru, Sinn Fein, Alliance, and SDLP signed a letter last week calling for a similar suspension.”

Labour MP Emily Thornberry has stated: “The British public deserve to know how arms exported by this country are being used across the world and the American public deserve the right to protest peacefully without the threat of violent repression.”

Will similar expressions of concern be raised by Members of Parliament in Canada?

To read a previous PBI-Canada article about a Canadian-made Stryker armoured vehicle – that is also used to monitor the increasingly militarized US/Mexico border – possibly being deployed in Portland, please click here.

Five reasons to say no to spending $19 billion on warplanes

The Canadian government intends to sign a $19 billion contract in 2022 with one of three transnational corporations bidding to manufacture 88 fighter jets for the Royal Canadian Air Force. Here are five reasons to say no to that planned purchase:

1- We can’t afford the fighter jets. On July 8, Finance Minister Bill Morneau announced that he expects a $343.2 billion deficit for the 2020-21 fiscal year due to the spending related to the pandemic. This is a dramatic increase from the $19 billion deficit in 2016 when the Trudeau government announced the bidding process for new fighter jets.

2- We need work, not war planes. Research by the Costs of War Project based at Brown’s University in Providence, Rhode Island found that $1 million spent on “defence” creates 6.9 direct and indirect jobs, while the same amount invested in solar power creates 9.5 jobs, in health care 14.3 jobs, and in education 19.2 jobs.

3- Bombing doesn’t bring peace. Canada’s current fleet of fighter jets has conducted 1,598 bombing missions. That bombing of Iraq, Libya, Syria and Yugoslavia did not bring the world closer to peace. Canada flew 10% of the NATO strike missions in Libya. The NATO bombing of water infrastructure in Libya has been described as a war crime.

4- Water, not war planes. In ‘Canada does not need fighter jets, period’, Charles Nixon, Canada’s Deputy Minister of National Defence (1975 to 1983) wrote: “New Canadian fighters … are not required to protect Canada’s populace or sovereignty.” In contrast, $4.7 billion would provide clean drinking water and sanitation services to all First Nations.

5- War planes are heavy polluters. The F-35 releases more carbon into the atmosphere in one long-range flight than a typical automobile does in a year. Canada’s six-month bombing campaign of Libya consumed 8.5 million litres of fuel. In contrast, $19 billion for a Green New Deal would help the needed transition to a green economy.

Spending $216 million on a fighter jet that costs CAD $40,000 an hour to fly is a bad investment that doesn’t help to save lives, create jobs, sustain the environment, or bring peace. To help make space for peace, please call on your Member of Parliament to publicly state their opposition to the purchase of new fighter jets.

#NoNewFighterJets #ClimatePeace #DefundTheMilitary

PBI-Spanish State co-produces publication on Indigenous struggles in Guatemala, Honduras and València

“Indigenous people on both shores”

Perifèries, a València, Spain-based international solidarity organization, has posted: “The fight in defence of territory knows no borders.”

It adds: “We joined forces with La Directa [a progressive Catalan media platform] and PBI-Estado Español to edit a dossier with indigenous struggles in Guatemala, Honduras and the Valencian country.”

PBI-Spanish States adds that the supplement highlights: “Indigenous fights and resistance against extractive projects in Guatemala, Honduras and the Valencia Country.”

The 7-page supplement can be read in Catalan by clicking here.

PBI-Canada welcomes ruling on Safe Third Country Agreement, but much remains to be done to uphold the human rights of migrants

In practical terms, the Canada-US Safe Third Country Agreement has meant, for example, that a person from Mexico seeking asylum at a Canadian checkpoint on the US border would be denied entry because the US is deemed a safe third country.

On July 22, Federal Court Justice Ann Marie McDonald ruled that the Safe Third Country infringes on the section of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms that guarantees “the right to life, liberty and security of the person”.

The ruling does not come into effect until January 22, 2021.

For asylum seekers crossing from Mexico into the US, they face both the obstacle of the 15,000 Mexican national guard soldiers deployed on that border and the 3,500 kilometres they would need to traverse to get to a Canadian border crossing.

It is also a reality that reaching the Canadian border does not mean freedom.

In recent years, the largest number of Mexican refugee applicants in Canada have sought asylum after flying to the Montréal-Pierre Elliott Trudeau International Airport. Overall, three-quarters of the Mexican refugee claims heard by the Refugee Board in 2017 were either rejected, abandoned or withdrawn.

And between 2006 and 2014, 87,317 migrants were jailed in Canada without charge. The Canada Border Services Agency has also stated that there were 6,609 people detained in holding centres in 2017-18, up from 4,248 a year earlier.

We also lament that prior to the Federal Court ruling that the Canadian government had been in the process of “modernizing” (expanding) the Safe Third Country Agreement.

Those seeking to escape the violence in Guatemala, Honduras and El Salvador also face the obstacles of other safe third country agreements.

The US has safe third country agreements with these countries meaning they would be turned back or returned at the southern border of the US.

If it had not been for the pandemic, Peace Brigades International-Canada would have hosted Javier Martinez Hernandez, the legal coordinator of the Saltillo Migrant Shelter, at meetings in Toronto, Ottawa and Montreal from March 14-18 to discuss a range of migrant rights issues including the Safe Third Country Agreement.

This migrant shelter, located in the city of Saltillo in the Mexican state of Coahuila, is not far from the border of Texas.

PBI-Mexico has noted: “The Saltillo Migrant Shelter offers daily humanitarian assistance — including clothes, medicines, food, rest, and medical and psychological care — to hundreds of migrants crossing Mexico to reach the United States.”

PBI-Mexico has further highlighted: “[The shelter] also defends migrants’ rights through the documentation of cases of kidnapping, extortion, abuses and violations that they suffer during their journey through Mexico. The organization lodges complaints about violations after gathering migrants’ testimonies.”

In May 2017, Médecins Sans Frontières‎ (Doctors Without Borders) noted: “68.3 percent of the migrant and refugee populations entering Mexico reported being victims of violence during their transit toward the United States [and] nearly one-third of the women surveyed had been sexually abused during their journey.”

That report explained: “MSF patients reported that the perpetrators of violence included members of gangs and other criminal organizations, as well as members of the Mexican security forces responsible for their protection.”

While PBI-Canada welcomes the Federal Court ruling and urges the Canadian government not to appeal it, we also note that much more needs to be done to address the conditions that lead to migration and to uphold the human rights of migrants.

PBI-Honduras issues ALERT on the increasing risks face by the Trans Women’s Collective

On July 22, the Peace Brigades International-Honduras Project issued ALERT: THE RISK AND VULNERABILITY OF THE TRANS WOMEN’S COLLECTIVE CONTINUES TO INCREASE; MURDER OF THE HUMAN RIGHTS DEFENDER AND MEMBER OF THE RAINBOW ASSOCIATON SCARLET CAMBEL that states:

The objective of this ALERT is to show our concern about the continuous increase in attacks against members of the LGTBIQ + community, especially trans women.

Similarly draw attention to its historical situation of vulnerability increased during the COVID19 health emergency and in which the LGTBIQ + group has not been considered a priority by the Government to receive government aid.

Since the curfew began on March 16, we have received information on at least fifteen violations of human rights against trans women, who join the great increase in domestic violence as a consequence of the lockdown.

According to the Mesoamerican Initiative of Women Human Rights Defenders, 96% of crimes committed against the LGTBIQ+ collective in the last 10 years remain unpunished.

According to the testimonies, state security agents and private security agents from centers are identified as aggressors. A fact that makes it difficult to file complaints, thus contributing to crimes remaining in the impunity.

On April 15, Scarlet and two companions reported having been attacked by a military patrol in the center of Tegucigalpa under the pretext of curfew implemented by the pandemic; they were also threatened with disappearance if they denounced the incident.

On the night of July 10, a group of trans women were attacked by unknown persons in the center of Tegucigalpa. The men arrived in a car without a license plate and began shooting directly at Scarlet Cambel, Human Rights defender and member of the LGBT Rainbow Association, who ended up dying as consequence of the shooting.

The shared figures and data reflect the violence and structural exclusion faced by trans women who are they are part of broader processes of lack of public policies with a differentiated approach.

Based on this information, we urge the international community:

– Request the competent authorities to guarantee compliance with due process in the case of Scarfe Cambel’s transfemicide, as well as in other reported cases that remain in impunity, developing an immediate, exhaustive and impartial investigation, without re-victimization and that complies with justice and the reparation of the comprehensive damage caused to the victim and her loved ones.

– Request to the National Mechanism for the Protection of the Honduran State the rapid and effective implementation of collective protection measures to the Rainbow Association with a differential approach and that these can be extended to the whole of the trans collective.

To read the full ALERT and all the recommendations, please click on EL RIESGO Y LA VULNERABILIDAD DEL COLECTIVO DE MUJERES TRANS SIGUE EN AUMENTO.

Switzerland to vote in referendum that would make Swiss corporations legally liable for human rights violations

On July 1, the Federal Council confirmed that a referendum will take place on November 29 on two popular initiatives: “Responsible companies – to protect the human being and the environment” and “For a ban on financing producers of war material”.

Reuters has also reported: “Swiss voters look set to get the final say on whether Swiss-based companies should be liable for human rights abuses and environmental violations in operations even outside Switzerland.”

That article adds: “Proponents of the initiative want Swiss companies to apply mandatory due diligence to identify risks to people and the environment in all their business, even involving suppliers abroad, and let victims seek redress in Switzerland.”

Solidar Suisse further explains: “Under the Responsible Business Initiative, Swiss based companies will be legally obliged to incorporate respect for human rights and the environment in all their business activities. This mandatory due diligence will also be applied to Swiss based companies’ activities abroad.”

“The mandatory due diligence instrument is based on the United Nations Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights.”

“According to these principles, companies must first review all their business relationships and activities with a view to identifying potential risks to people and the environment. They must then take effective measures to address the potentially negative impacts identified. As a third step, companies are required to report in a transparent manner on the violations identified, as well as on the related measures taken.”

“Although these provisions already exist in international soft law, they lack enforcement mechanisms to facilitate effective implementation. The UN leaves it to its member states to fill the existing gaps at national level.”

“The Responsible Business Initiative translates this obligation in Swiss law, renders the international due diligence mandatory and broadens the scope of mandatory due diligence by including the protection of the environment.”

A further two-page explanation along with the text of the initiative can be read here.

As noted here, Peace Brigades International is a supporting member organization of the Swiss Coalition for Corporate Justice.