Home Blog Page 344

PBI-Colombia accompanied Peace Community marks its 24th anniversary in struggle for life and territory

Photo by Comunidad de Paz San José de Apartadó that includes two PBI brigadistas (in green vests and hats) at today’s 24th anniversary gathering.

On March 23, the Peace Community of San José de Apartadó marked its 24th anniversary in struggle for life and territory.

The Peace Brigades International-Colombia Project posted: “PBI congratulates its example of building community life and territory, its resilience and courage in the face of serious threats and harassment that have also marked its history.”

On March 23, 1997, this farming community, situated in the Urabá region of the department of Antioquia in northwestern Colombia, declared itself neutral in the armed conflict and rejected the presence of all the armed groups in its territory.

This article written by the PBI field team in Urabá highlights: “Today, the need to defend land is more important than ever.”

“A consequence of the Peace Agreement between the former guerrilla group, FARC-EP, and the Colombian government has been a commodification of territories that, due to the armed conflict, were on the periphery of the market system.”

“In the case of the Peace Community, this means defending land from mining companies that have come into the area to exploit the wealth of natural resources.”

The PBI team adds: “The Peace Community has denounced the constant efforts from mining companies to penetrate the region and their attempts to persuade the local population.”

In this recent article in Yes! magazine, Agostino Petroni writes: “[The Peace Community is] under the threat of losing their communal land from a state project of agrarian reform, according to Germán Romero, a lawyer with [PBI-Colombia accompanied] dhColombia. [Romero] says the community has survived physical extermination but might not survive the state’s project of redistribution of land.”

The article quotes Romero: “We’re trying to keep the integrity of the territory.”

The PBI team also quotes Jesús Emilio, a member of the Peace Community’s Internal Council, who says: “It is possible that we will lose the fight against multinationals and the State. But at least we will provide humanity with the story of our struggle.”

PBI-Colombia has accompanied the Peace Community since 1999.

Several PBI brigadistas from Canada accompanied the Peace Community in those early years, including Steve Law and Evelyn Jones (from Kennetcook, Nova Scotia) in 1999 and Scott Pearce (from Toronto, Ontario) in 2000.

PBI-Canada also extends its congratulations to the Peace Community for the past 24 years and its ongoing struggle for life and territory.

PBI-Kenya highlights Toolkit Organizer Editar Ochieng interview on CANAL+ television

On March 23, PBI-Kenya posted: “Check out this report with Toolkit Organizer Editar Ochieng who defends women’s rights and helps survivors of sexual abuse. She shares about her work, her story and shows Les Émissions CANAL+ Afrique the murals made with the support of Peace Brigades International-Kenya Project.”

Editar says: “Violence against women is very common in Kibera and many people have normalized it. So many women experience violence and they do not talk about it because they think it is normal, especially women experiencing violence in their relationships.”

She adds: “For violence to reduce you must stand up strongly.”

In the CANAL+ interview, Editar talks about the murals in urban settlements. PBI-Kenya has noted: “Murals are effective in communicating messages of change.”

PBI-Kenya helped develop the ‘Toolkit for WHRDs in Nairobi’s Urban Settlements’ in 2016. The Toolkit Organizers network grew out of that. It is comprised of fifteen women human rights defenders (including Editar) from the urban settlements of Kibera, Langata, Kawangaware, Mukuru and Mathare.

PBI-Kenya has also highlighted: “Editar is an authentic, courageous and transformational leader. As a proud and radical intersectional feminist, she doesn’t apologize for challenging power dynamics and patriarchal systems that oppresses women systematically. Editar is a happily independent mother who raises her children using feminist approach.”

Editar is also the founder of Feminists for Peace, Rights and Justice Centre.

To watch that CANAL+ video (in French), click here.

For more about Editar in her own words, please click here.

On June 3, 2020, Editar spoke on this PBI-UK organized webinar. Watch it here.

Six Nations and Wellington Water Watchers resist the corporate extraction of water in Ontario

Makaśa Looking Horse of the Six Nations of the Grand River says: “Nestlé’s presence on our land causes permanent harm to our people and Mother Earth.”

Peace Brigades International-Switzerland has forwarded to us an alert from MultiWatch, a Basel-based organization that visibilizes human rights violations by Swiss transnational corporations including Vevey-based Nestlé S.A.

Last month, it was announced that Nestlé Waters North America would be sold to the private equity firms One Rock Capital Partners and Metropoulos & Co for $4.3 billion.

The sale would include the Nestlé owned well in Aberfoyle, located near Guelph, Ontario, that is permitted to extract 3.6 million litres of water per day.

There is currently a moratorium on new or expanded permits for water taking for bottling operations in Ontario. That moratorium, however, allows Nestlé to continue to extract water in Aberfoyle even though the permit for that operation expired in 2016.

Guelph Today reports: “Wellington Water Watchers chair Rob Case has called on Jeff Yurek, Ontario Minister of Environment, Conservation and Parks, to extend this moratorium and to not allow any active permits to transfer to the new company.”

Wellington Water Watchers is also calling on Minister Yurek to commit to phasing out permits to bottle water in Ontario.

Notably, the Aberfoyle well is on Six Nations territory in Ontario.

Makaśa Looking Horse says: “Nestlé’s presence on our land causes permanent harm to our people and Mother Earth.”

She highlights: “The Indigenous people of Six Nations, should always be at the table when the health of our water is at stake. We should have a say about the permits and our own water is governed. The reality is that we are rarely included in these conversations.”

In June 2019, Looking Horse read this cease and desist letter from the Haudenosaunee Confederacy Council to Nestlé. That letter stated: “Pursuant to the Haldimand Proclamation and the 1701 Nanfan Treaty, Nestlé sits on Haudenosaunee territory upon which it is carrying out illegal activity in removing aquifer waters from under our territory. We hold ancestral title to these lands, territories and waters.”

Wellington Water Watchers has also advocated that the Aberfoyle well should be returned to the Six Nations of the Grand River.

And yet the water takings by Nestlé continue.

The provincial moratorium on new and expanded permits expires on April 1. The sale of Nestlé Waters North America is expected to close this spring.

Peace Brigades International-Canada recognizes the human right to water and the Indigenous right to free, prior and informed consent. PBI accompanies Indigenous land defenders and water protectors in Latin America who experience threats, harassment, criminalization and judicialization for their activism. 

For more, you can watch the podcast series noted below by clicking here.

PBI-Mexico accompanies Peoples’ Front protest in defence of water at State Congress building in Cuernavaca, Morelos

Peoples’ Front: “The demonstration was mobilized from CONAGUA to the State Congress.”

On March 22, the Peace Brigades International-Mexico Project posted: “Today we accompanied the Peoples’ Front of Morelos, Puebla and Tlaxcala in a series of activities called within the framework of World Water Day.”

“During the morning, we went to visit the sit-in in the municipality of Alaya and later we stayed in front of the CONAGUA office in Cuernavaca. In the afternoon, we accompanied a peaceful demonstration that took place in front of the Cuernavaca Congress.”

PBI-Mexico highlights that at the meeting with CONAGUA “the Front demanded respect for the water rights of the ejidos of Ayala, Morelos, which are affected by the operation of the thermoelectric plant in Huexca.”

For context: Cuernavaca, situated about 90 kilometres south of Mexico City, is the capital city of the state of Morelos. Alaya, a municipality that will be affected by the thermoelectric plant, voted against the project in 2019. CONAGUA is the National Water Commission. And the ejidos (communal agricultural lands) of the city of Ayala in the state of Morelos depend on the Cuautla River that the plant will draw water from.

The Peoples’ Front has argued that the aqueduct – that will take 50 million litres of water a day from the Cuautla River to plant to cool its turbines – is illegal because CONAGUA has not granted the permits necessary for its construction.

And yet, as PBI-Mexico points out, “The aqueduct was built.”

The gas pipeline that will feed the thermoelectric plant was reportedly completed in December 2015 and was ready for operation in April 2016.

And Latino Rebels recently reported: “Operations at the newly constructed thermoelectric plant in Huexca, Morelos could begin in the near future.”

Despite this, the People’s Front continues its struggle against the Morelos Integral Project (PIM) comprised of the gas pipeline, aqueduct and thermoelectric plant. The Peoples’ Front is demanding that the pipe be immediately removed from the river.

La Jornada reports the protest demanded water not be removed from the Cuautla River, that it said the “construction was carried out illegally and by force of the National Guard”, and that CONAGUA and ASURCO (Cuautla River Users Association) have not granted permission for the transfer of the water.

PBI-Mexico has accompanied the Peoples’ Front since 2020.

Photos from today’s accompaniment:

Honduran human rights defender notes Canadian financing of dam during PBI-USA organized World Water Day webinar

Photo: MADJ coordinator Martín Fernández Guzman and PBI communications coordinator Hannah Matthews from today’s webinar.

On March 22, PBI-USA hosted a World Water Day screening of La Sangre de la Tierra (The Blood of the Earth), a documentary about community struggles against hydroelectric dams in Mexico, Guatemala, and Honduras.

After the screening, Martín Fernández Guzman, a member of the Broad Movement for Dignity and Justice (MADJ) spoke about the resistance in Honduras.

He highlighted the Canadian financing of a hydroelectric dam (at about the 1 hour, 13 minutes and 38 seconds mark in this video).

We have previously noted in this article that MADJ opposes the construction of a dam on the Jilamito River that is being financed by the Inter American Development Bank (IDB), of which Canada is a member.

On December 4, 2020, it was announced that IDB Invest had approved a $20.25 million loan to support the development, construction, and operation of the dam.

Then Maria Caal Xol of the Peaceful Resistance of Cahabón, a collective of 38 Maya Q’eqchi communities, spoke about the resistance to the Oxec and Renace hydroelectric dams on the Cahabón River and its tributaries in Guatemala.

Key land defence struggles against hydroelectric dams on Indigenous territories in Canada include the fight against the Site C dam (Treaty 8 territory in British Columbia) and the Muskrat Falls dam (Innu territory in Labrador).

The Canadian Dam Association has noted: “There are over 15,000 dams in Canada of which 1,157 are categorised as ‘large’ dams under the ICOLD [International Commission on Large Dams] definition [meaning 15 metres or higher].”

Historically, the PBI-North America Project visited Nitassinan (Quebec-Labrador) when the Innu community of Maliotenam was opposing the construction of the Sainte-Marguerite III hydroelectric project on the Sainte-Marguerite River.

The video of the webinar can be seen here.

Enbridge pipeline company funding of police challenged in Hamilton, now seen in Minnesota and elsewhere

“200+ folks face criminal charges for protecting our territory from Line 3.”: Tara Houska, Giniw Collective

Emily Atkin reports in Heated: “Enbridge established a financial relationship with Minnesota law enforcement in May 2020, when the state Public Utilities Commission approved Line 3’s route permit. That permit required the oil giant to set up a special fund that would reimburse police responding to anything pipeline-related.”

Atkin adds: “The permit said law enforcement could get reimbursed by Enbridge for any activity related to public safety and the pipeline.”

Notably, Atkin cites an article in The Intercept that reports a Minnesota Sheriff’s Office has requested Enbridge reimburse them for nearly $72,000 worth of riot gear and more than $10,000 in other costs including tear gas, pepper spray and batons.

Jane Fonda, who was in a car stopped by police while in Minnesota to speak against the Line 3 pipeline, has commented on this situation.

Fonda says: “This is a public police force that’s been privatized by a foreign oil company, and every minute they spend harassing the water protectors—and assaulting the water protectors—they turn in an invoice and they get paid.”

The article further notes that the Partnership for Civil Justice Fund is preparing to take legal action to challenge Enbridge’s financial relationship with Minnesota police.

Enbridge funded Hamilton police in 2013

In 2013, Hamilton 350 was fighting against the Enbridge Line 9B pipeline that puts at risk the Beverly Swamp in the headwaters of Spencer Creek, Hamilton’s largest watershed.

At that time, CBC reported: “Representatives from Hamilton 350 filed a policy complaint against Hamilton police services board for accepting $44,410 in donations from Enbridge Pipelines Inc. The money was given in two separate installments — $34,910 for a new ATV unit and $9,500 for mapping and GPS equipment in 2010.”

By November 2015, Toronto.com reported: “Enbridge Pipelines has stopped giving equipment grants to police services across Canada because of criticisms from Hamilton activists.”

Funding through police foundations

But companies can also direct money to the police through foundations.

In August 2020, The Tyee reported: “Canadian police forces have received millions of dollars from oil companies, banks and financiers, through shadowy charitable foundations that have little public oversight and increasingly serve as a ‘cash cow’ of private money.”

For example, that article cites: “Oil companies like Enbridge, Cenovus and Canadian Natural Resources Ltd. helped kickstart the Calgary Police Foundation in 2012 with million-dollar donations, and pipeline company TransCanada is an annual donor, though the foundation would not say how much current donors give.”

“Cooperation agreements” in Colombia

Peace Brigades International-Canada has also drawn attention to the concern that the Canadian oil company Frontera Energy signed two agreements with the Ministry of Defence in Colombia for a total of US$1,343,106 to secure army protection for its activities.

In Colombia, the police are a part of the Ministry of Defence.

Not long after these agreements were signed, the police and army arrested eight social leaders who had been protested the environmental impacts of the company on their community of San Luis de Palenque in the department of Casanare.

There are reportedly more than 200 of these ‘cooperation agreements’ between the Ministry of Defence and more than 70 national and international companies.

PBI-Canada continues to follow these situations with concern.

COPINH coordinator Bertha Zúñiga Cáceres expresses support for the Berta Cáceres Human Rights in Honduras Act

On March 21, during the Women Warriors panel of the Building Movements in Defence of Life film festival, Bertha Zúñiga Cáceres, general coordinator of COPINH, expressed her support for the proposed Berta Cáceres Human Rights in Honduras Act.

On March 3, US Representative Hank Johnson reintroduced the Act.

His website notes: “The Berta Cáceres Human Rights in Honduras Act would suspend U.S. funding for police and military operations, and prohibit international loans providing security assistance from being dispersed unless the Honduran government investigates and prosecutes blatant human rights violations by their police and military forces.”

The Berta Caceres Act is backed by US Representatives Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez and Ilhan Omar among several others members of Congress.

Representative Omar says: “In 2019 and 2017, I had the honor of meeting with her daughter as she pursues justice for Berta. Yet to this day, we continue to provide security aid to a government that murders human rights activists with zero legal accountability.”

This coming March 24, Ilhan and Bertha will be speaking again on a Witness for Peace Solidarity Collective organized webinar titled: Connecting Indigenous Resistance to US Extractivism and Militarization.

Witness for Peace explains: “The event will focus on building international solidarity amidst the struggle against extractive projects, militarization, and continued violence.”

In 2009, Canada provided $16.4 million in official assistance to Honduras. After the coup, that aid has increased to an average of $29 million per year between 2010 to 2016. On July 30, 2009, about a month after the coup, The Globe and Mail reported: “Canada is still providing training to members of the Honduran army.”

PBI-Canada and PBI-USA co-sponsored the screening of the film La Lucha Sigue at this weekend’s Mutual Aid Media organized film festival.

To see the trailer for that film, please click here.

PBI-Honduras has accompanied COPINH since May 2016.

“We never wanted to go to the police, because it was the police who were chasing us.” The National Network of Women Human Rights Defenders in Honduras explains that in Honduras 70 per cent of the attacks against women defenders the aggressors are state security forces, especially police or the military.

“No prisons on stolen land”: Protests draw attention to the incarceration of Indigenous peoples in Canada

The #FreeThemAll march in Ottawa said: “No prisons on stolen land.”

On March 20, a national day of action highlighted the impact of the COVD-19 pandemic on prisoners in Canada, notably Indigenous peoples.

In late January, University of Ottawa criminology professor Justin Piché stated that there have been more than 1,500 cases of COVID-19 in the federal prison system and more than 5,000 in the correctional system overall.

In Canada, if a person is sentenced to less than two years they go to a provincial jail, for sentences over two years they go to a federal prison.

In 2015, the federal Truth and Reconciliation Commission recommended: “We call upon federal, provincial, and territorial governments to commit to eliminating the overrepresentation of Aboriginal people in custody over the next decade, and to issue detailed annual reports that monitor and evaluate progress in doing so.”

And yet MacLean’s magazine reports: “There are more than 12,500 inmates in our federal system: Nearly one-third of them are Indigenous, eight per cent are black. Upwards of three-quarters of the prison population in Manitoba and Saskatchewan are Indigenous.”

That article commented: “Our prison system is racist.”

Radio Canada International further notes: “Government statistics from 2016 show that Indigenous people in Canada make up five per cent of the population … yet make up more than 30 per cent of those behind bars.”

Correctional Investigator (a federal ombudsperson for prisons) Ivan Zinger says: “I am particularly concerned by the fact that Indigenous inmates accounted for close to 60% of all positive COVID-19 cases in Canadian prisons since November.”

The United Nations has also expressed concern about the health-related implications of incarceration during the pandemic.

UN High Commissioner for Human Rights Michelle Bachelet had stated at the part of the pandemic that governments must work quickly to reduce the number of people in detention. And the Chair of the United Nations Permanent Forum on Indigenous Issues said: “We urge Member States and the international community to include the specific needs and priorities of indigenous peoples in addressing the global outbreak of COVID 19.”

The Correctional Service of Canada, which operates 53 federal prisons across the country, has an annual budget of about $2.6 billion.

Millions more are spent on provincial systems. For instance, the budget in Saskatchewan for “custody, supervision and rehabilitation services” is about $187 million. About 75 per cent of the inmates in that provincial system are Indigenous. About 65 per cent of the inmates in the federal prisons in Saskatchewan are Indigenous.

Abolition feminism envisions a society in which this money would be directed toward the public good and addressing systemic inequalities and where “safety and security will not be premised on violence or the threat of violence.”

Indigenous Wayuu denounce Canadian-owned Isagen installation of wind power project on sacred site in Colombia

On March 20, Colombian environmental defender Oscar Sampayo tweeted: “The Canadian investment fund @Brookfield owner of @ISAGEN in Colombia, violent and disrespectful sacred sites of the Wayúu community in northern Colombia.”

In 2016, the Toronto-based Brookfield bought a majority share (57.6 per cent) in the Medellin-based power generation and distribution company Isagen.

While there does not appear to be media reports on this yet, this is what we can piece together from other social media posts:

Sampayo’s tweet follows the tweet from the Nacion Wayuu ONG that says: “Isagen invades Wayuu indigenous territories and desecrates sacred sites to install a wind project in an inconsistent and arbitrary manner.”

Willander Pushaina has also tweeted: “@ISAGEN profane sacred sites of the Wayuu People, that private company speaks of DEVELOPMENT, a development that will generate a conflict in the territory, physical and cultural extermination of an ancient people.”

And Oscar Montero has tweeted: “For the Wayuu people, cemeteries are their sacred places where the bodies of their loved ones rest. To desecrate them is to break the spiritual connection of the Wayuu who have gone to Jepirra and of those who are on Mother Earth.”

Jepira is the place where the spirits of the Wayuu dead go to begin their journey. There, the souls can transform into rain to come back to the Guajira desert.

Isagen is also involved in hydroelectric projects.

In 2016, the PBI-Colombia accompanied Luis Carlos Perez Lawyers’ Collective (CCALCP) filed a challenge against Isagen’s proposed 152-MW Piedra del Sol hydroelectric project given concerns about the project’s impact on the water supply and fragile ecosystems.

Brookfield now also owns through Isagen the Sogamoso Hydroelectric Dam which is located 30 kilometres west of Bucaramanga. Between 2009 and 2014, six activists were killed and many more were disappeared in relation to their opposition to this dam.

Brookfield plans to invest billions in solar and renewable power.

Last month, Bloomberg reported: “Brookfield Asset Management Inc. plans to raise at least $7.5 billion (all figures U.S.) for a new climate-focused fund, as the Canadian investment firm builds out an ESG [environmental, social and governance] business led by former Bank of Canada and Bank of England governor Mark Carney.”

That article also noted: “There’s no path to net zero without large capital investments in clean power, said Carney [who also says] getting the carbon out of energy systems means replacing fossil fuels with solar and other renewable sources and will require $3 trillion or more a year in capital investment for decades.”

What’s next?

The Nación Wayuú ONG has called “on the Colombian State, national and international control bodies and Isagen, to refrain from continuing to implement their project until the fundamental right to free and informed prior consent to which indigenous peoples are entitled is fulfilled.”

Last week, Juliette de Rivero, Representative of the Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights in Colombia, tweeted: “We visit the communities of the Wayuu people of La Guajira to follow up on the human rights situation.”

Calgary-based Canacol Energy Ltd. CEO acknowledges communities “heavily opposed” to fracking in Colombia

Charle Gamba, Canacol CEO

On March 19, Canacol CEO Charle Gamba responded to a question about fracking in Colombia during a conference call with investors.

A fracking pilot project contract has already been awarded to Ecopetrol for its Kale project near Puerto Wilches in the Magdalena Medio region. A second contract is expected to be awarded on April 8 to ExxonMobil (and Toronto-based Sintana Energy) for its Platero project, which is also situated in the Magdalena Medio region.

Gamba stated: “The regulatory environment at the moment is favorable for these fracking pilots. By no means does that ensure that, they will be able to execute them without difficulty, especially from the communities who remain heavily opposed to fracking from an environmental perspective.”

Prior to this, Canacol had appeared ready to frack in Colombia.

Canacol holds a 20 per cent stake in the VMM-2/Plata and VMM-3/Piranga projects. ConocoPhillips holds the remaining 80 per cent stake. In September 2020, Gamba told La Republica: “We have two unconventional oil blocks that we have located in Magdalena Medio for eight years to pilot fracking. We are awaiting the regulatory framework.”

But by March of this year, Argus Media reported that while Canacol had been expected to apply for a fracking pilot project, it was “still on the sidelines for now.”

Canacol had previously attempted to frack the Plata and Piranga sites in 2016. An estimated 9,000 people marched in San Martin, Cesar in opposition to this. There was even a community blockade of their exploration site. Residents reportedly faced stigmatization, police brutality and criminalization. Those permits were eventually revoked because Piranga did not meet minimum conditions and Plata raised water protection concerns.

Gamba now seemingly acknowledges “the communities who remain heavily opposed to fracking from an environmental perspective.”

Last month, an Oil Barometer poll found that 73 per cent of Colombians would not agree with fracking being carried out in their municipality and that 69 per cent of people in Puerto Wilches also disagree with fracking.

To date, it is unclear if Sintana Energy Inc. executives have similarly acknowledged community opposition and environmental concerns, or the dangers faced by environmental defenders in the Magdalen Medio region and how the company intends to navigate their human rights obligations should it be awarded a contract on April 8.

Blockade of the ConocoPhillips/Canacol Energy VMM-2 block in September 2016.